* fixes/2.45.1/2.41:
Revert "fsck: warn about symlink pointing inside a gitdir"
Revert "Add a helper function to compare file contents"
clone: drop the protections where hooks aren't run
tests: verify that `clone -c core.hooksPath=/dev/null` works again
Revert "core.hooksPath: add some protection while cloning"
init: use the correct path of the templates directory again
hook: plug a new memory leak
ci: stop installing "gcc-13" for osx-gcc
ci: avoid bare "gcc" for osx-gcc job
ci: drop mention of BREW_INSTALL_PACKAGES variable
send-email: avoid creating more than one Term::ReadLine object
send-email: drop FakeTerm hack
* fixes/2.45.1/2.40:
Revert "fsck: warn about symlink pointing inside a gitdir"
Revert "Add a helper function to compare file contents"
clone: drop the protections where hooks aren't run
tests: verify that `clone -c core.hooksPath=/dev/null` works again
Revert "core.hooksPath: add some protection while cloning"
init: use the correct path of the templates directory again
hook: plug a new memory leak
ci: stop installing "gcc-13" for osx-gcc
ci: avoid bare "gcc" for osx-gcc job
ci: drop mention of BREW_INSTALL_PACKAGES variable
send-email: avoid creating more than one Term::ReadLine object
send-email: drop FakeTerm hack
Revert overly aggressive "layered defence" that went into 2.45.1
and friends, which broke "git-lfs", "git-annex", and other use
cases, so that we can rebuild necessary counterparts in the open.
* jc/fix-2.45.1-and-friends-for-2.39:
Revert "fsck: warn about symlink pointing inside a gitdir"
Revert "Add a helper function to compare file contents"
clone: drop the protections where hooks aren't run
tests: verify that `clone -c core.hooksPath=/dev/null` works again
Revert "core.hooksPath: add some protection while cloning"
init: use the correct path of the templates directory again
hook: plug a new memory leak
ci: stop installing "gcc-13" for osx-gcc
ci: avoid bare "gcc" for osx-gcc job
ci: drop mention of BREW_INSTALL_PACKAGES variable
send-email: avoid creating more than one Term::ReadLine object
send-email: drop FakeTerm hack
This reverts commit a33fea08 (fsck: warn about symlink pointing
inside a gitdir, 2024-04-10), which warns against symbolic links
commonly created by git-annex.
Now that during a `git clone`, the hooks' contents are no longer
compared to the templates' files', the caller for which the
`do_files_match()` function was introduced is gone, and therefore this
function can be retired, too.
This reverts commit 584de0b4c2 (Add a helper function to compare file
contents, 2024-03-30).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As part of the security bug-fix releases v2.39.4, ..., v2.45.1, I
introduced logic to safeguard `git clone` from running hooks that were
installed _during_ the clone operation.
The rationale was that Git's CVE-2024-32002, CVE-2021-21300,
CVE-2019-1354, CVE-2019-1353, CVE-2019-1352, and CVE-2019-1349 should
have been low-severity vulnerabilities but were elevated to
critical/high severity by the attack vector that allows a weakness where
files inside `.git/` can be inadvertently written during a `git clone`
to escalate to a Remote Code Execution attack by virtue of installing a
malicious `post-checkout` hook that Git will then run at the end of the
operation without giving the user a chance to see what code is executed.
Unfortunately, Git LFS uses a similar strategy to install its own
`post-checkout` hook during a `git clone`; In fact, Git LFS is
installing four separate hooks while running the `smudge` filter.
While this pattern is probably in want of being improved by introducing
better support in Git for Git LFS and other tools wishing to register
hooks to be run at various stages of Git's commands, let's undo the
clone protections to unbreak Git LFS-enabled clones.
This reverts commit 8db1e8743c (clone: prevent hooks from running
during a clone, 2024-03-28).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As part of the protections added in Git v2.45.1 and friends,
repository-local `core.hooksPath` settings are no longer allowed, as a
defense-in-depth mechanism to prevent future Git vulnerabilities to
raise to critical level if those vulnerabilities inadvertently allow the
repository-local config to be written.
What the added protection did not anticipate is that such a
repository-local `core.hooksPath` can not only be used to point to
maliciously-placed scripts in the current worktree, but also to
_prevent_ hooks from being called altogether.
We just reverted the `core.hooksPath` protections, based on the Git
maintainer's recommendation in
https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqq4jaxvm8z.fsf@gitster.g/ to address this
concern as well as related ones. Let's make sure that we won't regress
while trying to protect the clone operation further.
Reported-by: Brooke Kuhlmann <brooke@alchemists.io>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This defense-in-depth was intended to protect the clone operation
against future escalations where bugs in `git clone` would allow
attackers to write arbitrary files in the `.git/` directory would allow
for Remote Code Execution attacks via maliciously-placed hooks.
However, it turns out that the `core.hooksPath` protection has
unintentional side effects so severe that they do not justify the
benefit of the protections. For example, it has been reported in
https://lore.kernel.org/git/FAFA34CB-9732-4A0A-87FB-BDB272E6AEE8@alchemists.io/
that the following invocation, which is intended to make `git clone`
safer, is itself broken by that protective measure:
git clone --config core.hooksPath=/dev/null <url>
Since it turns out that the benefit does not justify the cost, let's revert
20f3588efc (core.hooksPath: add some protection while cloning,
2024-03-30).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In df93e407f0 (init: refactor the template directory discovery into its
own function, 2024-03-29), I refactored the way the templates directory
is discovered.
The refactoring was faithful, but missed a reference in the `Makefile`
where the `DEFAULT_GIT_TEMPLATE_DIR` constant is defined. As a
consequence, Git v2.45.1 and friends will always use the hard-coded path
`/usr/share/git-core/templates`.
Let's fix that by defining the `DEFAULT_GIT_TEMPLATE_DIR` when building
`setup.o`, where that constant is actually used.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 8db1e8743c (clone: prevent hooks from running during a clone,
2024-03-28), I introduced an inadvertent memory leak that was
unfortunately not caught before v2.45.1 was released. Here is a fix.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Our osx-gcc job explicitly asks to install gcc-13. But since the GitHub
runner image already comes with gcc-13 installed, this is mostly doing
nothing (or in some cases it may install an incremental update over the
runner image). But worse, it recently started causing errors like:
==> Fetching gcc@13
==> Downloading https://ghcr.io/v2/homebrew/core/gcc/13/blobs/sha256:fb2403d97e2ce67eb441b54557cfb61980830f3ba26d4c5a1fe5ecd0c9730d1a
==> Pouring gcc@13--13.2.0.ventura.bottle.tar.gz
Error: The `brew link` step did not complete successfully
The formula built, but is not symlinked into /usr/local
Could not symlink bin/c++-13
Target /usr/local/bin/c++-13
is a symlink belonging to gcc. You can unlink it:
brew unlink gcc
which cause the whole CI job to bail.
I didn't track down the root cause, but I suspect it may be related to
homebrew recently switching the "gcc" default to gcc-14. And it may even
be fixed when a new runner image is released. But if we don't need to
run brew at all, it's one less thing for us to worry about.
[jc: cherry-picked from v2.45.0-3-g7df2405b38]
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
On macOS, a bare "gcc" (without a version) will invoke a wrapper for
clang, not actual gcc. Even when gcc is installed via homebrew, that
only provides version-specific links in /usr/local/bin (like "gcc-13"),
and never a version-agnostic "gcc" wrapper.
As far as I can tell, this has been the case for a long time, and this
osx-gcc job has largely been doing nothing. We can point it at "gcc-13",
which will pick up the homebrew-installed version.
The fix here is specific to the github workflow file, as the gitlab one
does not have a matching job.
It's a little unfortunate that we cannot just ask for the latest version
of gcc which homebrew provides, but as far as I can tell there is no
easy alias (you'd have to find the highest number gcc-* in
/usr/local/bin yourself).
[jc: cherry-picked from v2.45.0-2-g11c7001e3d]
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The last user of this variable went away in 4a6e4b9602 (CI: remove
Travis CI support, 2021-11-23), so it's doing nothing except making it
more confusing to find out which packages _are_ installed.
[jc: cherry-picked from v2.45.0-1-g9d4453e8d6]
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Every time git-send-email calls its ask() function to prompt the user,
we call term(), which instantiates a new Term::ReadLine object. But in
v1.46 of Term::ReadLine::Gnu (which provides the Term::ReadLine
interface on some platforms), its constructor refuses to create a second
instance[1]. So on systems with that version of the module, most
git-send-email instances will fail (as we usually prompt for both "to"
and "in-reply-to" unless the user provided them on the command line).
We can fix this by keeping a single instance variable and returning it
for each call to term(). In perl 5.10 and up, we could do that with a
"state" variable. But since we only require 5.008, we'll do it the
old-fashioned way, with a lexical "my" in its own scope.
Note that the tests in t9001 detect this problem as-is, since the
failure mode is for the program to die. But let's also beef up the
"Prompting works" test to check that it correctly handles multiple
inputs (if we had chosen to keep our FakeTerm hack in the previous
commit, then the failure mode would be incorrectly ignoring prompts
after the first).
[1] For discussion of why multiple instances are forbidden, see:
https://github.com/hirooih/perl-trg/issues/16
[jc: cherry-picked from v2.42.0-rc2~6^2]
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Back in 280242d1cc (send-email: do not barf when Term::ReadLine does not
like your terminal, 2006-07-02), we added a fallback for when
Term::ReadLine's constructor failed: we'd have a FakeTerm object
instead, which would then die if anybody actually tried to call
readline() on it. Since we instantiated the $term variable at program
startup, we needed this workaround to let the program run in modes when
we did not prompt the user.
But later, in f4dc9432fd (send-email: lazily load modules for a big
speedup, 2021-05-28), we started loading Term::ReadLine lazily only when
ask() is called. So at that point we know we're trying to prompt the
user, and we can just die if ReadLine instantiation fails, rather than
making this fake object to lazily delay showing the error.
This should be OK even if there is no tty (e.g., we're in a cron job),
because Term::ReadLine will return a stub object in that case whose "IN"
and "OUT" functions return undef. And since 5906f54e47 (send-email:
don't attempt to prompt if tty is closed, 2009-03-31), we check for that
case and skip prompting.
And we can be sure that FakeTerm was not kicking in for such a
situation, because it has actually been broken since that commit! It
does not define "IN" or "OUT" methods, so perl would barf with an error.
If FakeTerm was in use, we were neither honoring what 5906f54e47 tried
to do, nor producing the readable message that 280242d1cc intended.
So we're better off just dropping FakeTerm entirely, and letting the
error reported by constructing Term::ReadLine through.
[jc: cherry-picked from v2.42.0-rc2~6^2~1]
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint-2.41: (38 commits)
Git 2.41.1
Git 2.40.2
Git 2.39.4
fsck: warn about symlink pointing inside a gitdir
core.hooksPath: add some protection while cloning
init.templateDir: consider this config setting protected
clone: prevent hooks from running during a clone
Add a helper function to compare file contents
init: refactor the template directory discovery into its own function
find_hook(): refactor the `STRIP_EXTENSION` logic
clone: when symbolic links collide with directories, keep the latter
entry: report more colliding paths
t5510: verify that D/F confusion cannot lead to an RCE
submodule: require the submodule path to contain directories only
clone_submodule: avoid using `access()` on directories
submodules: submodule paths must not contain symlinks
clone: prevent clashing git dirs when cloning submodule in parallel
t7423: add tests for symlinked submodule directories
has_dir_name(): do not get confused by characters < '/'
docs: document security issues around untrusted .git dirs
...
* maint-2.40: (39 commits)
Git 2.40.2
Git 2.39.4
fsck: warn about symlink pointing inside a gitdir
core.hooksPath: add some protection while cloning
init.templateDir: consider this config setting protected
clone: prevent hooks from running during a clone
Add a helper function to compare file contents
init: refactor the template directory discovery into its own function
find_hook(): refactor the `STRIP_EXTENSION` logic
clone: when symbolic links collide with directories, keep the latter
entry: report more colliding paths
t5510: verify that D/F confusion cannot lead to an RCE
submodule: require the submodule path to contain directories only
clone_submodule: avoid using `access()` on directories
submodules: submodule paths must not contain symlinks
clone: prevent clashing git dirs when cloning submodule in parallel
t7423: add tests for symlinked submodule directories
has_dir_name(): do not get confused by characters < '/'
docs: document security issues around untrusted .git dirs
upload-pack: disable lazy-fetching by default
...
* maint-2.39: (38 commits)
Git 2.39.4
fsck: warn about symlink pointing inside a gitdir
core.hooksPath: add some protection while cloning
init.templateDir: consider this config setting protected
clone: prevent hooks from running during a clone
Add a helper function to compare file contents
init: refactor the template directory discovery into its own function
find_hook(): refactor the `STRIP_EXTENSION` logic
clone: when symbolic links collide with directories, keep the latter
entry: report more colliding paths
t5510: verify that D/F confusion cannot lead to an RCE
submodule: require the submodule path to contain directories only
clone_submodule: avoid using `access()` on directories
submodules: submodule paths must not contain symlinks
clone: prevent clashing git dirs when cloning submodule in parallel
t7423: add tests for symlinked submodule directories
has_dir_name(): do not get confused by characters < '/'
docs: document security issues around untrusted .git dirs
upload-pack: disable lazy-fetching by default
fetch/clone: detect dubious ownership of local repositories
...
This topic addresses two CVEs:
- CVE-2024-32020:
Local clones may end up hardlinking files into the target repository's
object database when source and target repository reside on the same
disk. If the source repository is owned by a different user, then
those hardlinked files may be rewritten at any point in time by the
untrusted user.
- CVE-2024-32021:
When cloning a local source repository that contains symlinks via the
filesystem, Git may create hardlinks to arbitrary user-readable files
on the same filesystem as the target repository in the objects/
directory.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This topic branch adds a couple of measures designed to make it much
harder to exploit any bugs in Git's recursive clone machinery that might
be found in the future.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
In the wake of fixing a vulnerability where `git clone` mistakenly
followed a symbolic link that it had just written while checking out
files, writing into a gitdir, let's add some defense-in-depth by
teaching `git fsck` to report symbolic links stored in its trees that
point inside `.git/`.
Even though the Git project never made any promises about the exact
shape of the `.git/` directory's contents, there are likely repositories
out there containing symbolic links that point inside the gitdir. For
that reason, let's only report these as warnings, not as errors.
Security-conscious users are encouraged to configure
`fsck.symlinkPointsToGitDir = error`.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Quite frequently, when vulnerabilities were found in Git's (quite
complex) clone machinery, a relatively common way to escalate the
severity was to trick Git into running a hook which is actually a script
that has just been laid on disk as part of that clone. This constitutes
a Remote Code Execution vulnerability, the highest severity observed in
Git's vulnerabilities so far.
Some previously-fixed vulnerabilities allowed malicious repositories to
be crafted such that Git would check out files not in the worktree, but
in, say, a submodule's `<git>/hooks/` directory.
A vulnerability that "merely" allows to modify the Git config would
allow a related attack vector, to manipulate Git into looking in the
worktree for hooks, e.g. redirecting the location where Git looks for
hooks, via setting `core.hooksPath` (which would be classified as
CWE-427: Uncontrolled Search Path Element and CWE-114: Process Control,
for more details see https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/427.html and
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/114.html).
To prevent that attack vector, let's error out and complain loudly if an
active `core.hooksPath` configuration is seen in the repository-local
Git config during a `git clone`.
There is one caveat: This changes Git's behavior in a slightly
backwards-incompatible manner. While it is probably a rare scenario (if
it exists at all) to configure `core.hooksPath` via a config in the Git
templates, it _is_ conceivable that some valid setup requires this to
work. In the hopefully very unlikely case that a user runs into this,
there is an escape hatch: set the `GIT_CLONE_PROTECTION_ACTIVE=false`
environment variable. Obviously, this should be done only with utmost
caution.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
The ability to configuring the template directory is a delicate feature:
It allows defining hooks that will be run e.g. during a `git clone`
operation, such as the `post-checkout` hook.
As such, it is of utmost importance that Git would not allow that config
setting to be changed during a `git clone` by mistake, allowing an
attacker a chance for a Remote Code Execution, allowing attackers to run
arbitrary code on unsuspecting users' machines.
As a defense-in-depth measure, to prevent minor vulnerabilities in the
`git clone` code from ballooning into higher-serverity attack vectors,
let's make this a protected setting just like `safe.directory` and
friends, i.e. ignore any `init.templateDir` entries from any local
config.
Note: This does not change the behavior of any recursive clone (modulo
bugs), as the local repository config is not even supposed to be written
while cloning the superproject, except in one scenario: If a config
template is configured that sets the template directory. This might be
done because `git clone --recurse-submodules --template=<directory>`
does not pass that template directory on to the submodules'
initialization.
Another scenario where this commit changes behavior is where
repositories are _not_ cloned recursively, and then some (intentional,
benign) automation configures the template directory to be used before
initializing the submodules.
So the caveat is that this could theoretically break existing processes.
In both scenarios, there is a way out, though: configuring the template
directory via the environment variable `GIT_TEMPLATE_DIR`.
This change in behavior is a trade-off between security and
backwards-compatibility that is struck in favor of security.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Critical security issues typically combine relatively common
vulnerabilities such as case confusion in file paths with other
weaknesses in order to raise the severity of the attack.
One such weakness that has haunted the Git project in many a
submodule-related CVE is that any hooks that are found are executed
during a clone operation. Examples are the `post-checkout` and
`fsmonitor` hooks.
However, Git's design calls for hooks to be disabled by default, as only
disabled example hooks are copied over from the templates in
`<prefix>/share/git-core/templates/`.
As a defense-in-depth measure, let's prevent those hooks from running.
Obviously, administrators can choose to drop enabled hooks into the
template directory, though, _and_ it is also possible to override
`core.hooksPath`, in which case the new check needs to be disabled.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
In the next commit, Git will learn to disallow hooks during `git clone`
operations _except_ when those hooks come from the templates (which are
inherently supposed to be trusted). To that end, we add a function to
compare the contents of two files.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This topic branch fixes two vulnerabilities:
- Recursive clones on case-insensitive filesystems that support symbolic
links are susceptible to case confusion that can be exploited to
execute just-cloned code during the clone operation.
- Repositories can be configured to execute arbitrary code during local
clones. To address this, the ownership checks introduced in v2.30.3
are now extended to cover cloning local repositories.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
We will need to call this function from `hook.c` to be able to prevent
hooks from running that were written as part of a `clone` but did not
originate from the template directory.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
When looking for a hook and not finding one, and when `STRIP_EXTENSION`
is available (read: if we're on Windows and `.exe` is the required
extension for executable programs), we want to look also for a hook with
that extension.
Previously, we added that handling into the conditional block that was
meant to handle when no hook was found (possibly providing some advice
for the user's benefit). If the hook with that file extension was found,
we'd return early from that function instead of writing out said advice,
of course.
However, we're about to introduce a safety valve to prevent hooks from
being run during a clone, to reduce the attack surface of bugs that
allow writing files to be written into arbitrary locations.
To prepare for that, refactor the logic to avoid the early return, by
separating the `STRIP_EXTENSION` handling from the conditional block
handling the case when no hook was found.
This commit is best viewed with `--patience`.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
When recursively cloning a repository with submodules, we must ensure
that the submodules paths do not suddenly contain symbolic links that
would let Git write into unintended locations. We just plugged that
vulnerability, but let's add some more defense-in-depth.
Since we can only keep one item on disk if multiple index entries' paths
collide, we may just as well avoid keeping a symbolic link (because that
would allow attack vectors where Git follows those links by mistake).
Technically, we handle more situations than cloning submodules into
paths that were (partially) replaced by symbolic links. This provides
defense-in-depth in case someone finds a case-folding confusion
vulnerability in the future that does not even involve submodules.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
In b878579ae7 (clone: report duplicate entries on case-insensitive
filesystems, 2018-08-17) code was added to warn about index entries that
resolve to the same file system entity (usually the cause is a
case-insensitive filesystem).
In Git for Windows, where inodes are not trusted (because of a
performance trade-off, inodes are equal to 0 by default), that check
does not compare inode numbers but the verbatim path.
This logic works well when index entries' paths differ only in case.
However, for file/directory conflicts only the file's path was reported,
leaving the user puzzled with what that path collides.
Let's try ot catch colliding paths even if one path is the prefix of the
other. We do this also in setups where the file system is case-sensitive
because the inode check would not be able to catch those collisions.
While not a complete solution (for example, on macOS, Unicode
normalization could also lead to file/directory conflicts but be missed
by this logic), it is at least another defensive layer on top of what
the previous commits added.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
The most critical vulnerabilities in Git lead to a Remote Code Execution
("RCE"), i.e. the ability for an attacker to have malicious code being
run as part of a Git operation that is not expected to run said code,
such has hooks delivered as part of a `git clone`.
A couple of parent commits ago, a bug was fixed that let Git be confused
by the presence of a path `a-` to mistakenly assume that a directory
`a/` can safely be created without removing an existing `a` that is a
symbolic link.
This bug did not represent an exploitable vulnerability on its
own; Let's make sure it stays that way.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Submodules are stored in subdirectories of their superproject. When
these subdirectories have been replaced with symlinks by a malicious
actor, all kinds of mayhem can be caused.
This _should_ not be possible, but many CVEs in the past showed that
_when_ possible, it allows attackers to slip in code that gets executed
during, say, a `git clone --recursive` operation.
Let's add some defense-in-depth to disallow submodule paths to have
anything except directories in them.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
In 0060fd1511 (clone --recurse-submodules: prevent name squatting on
Windows, 2019-09-12), I introduced code to verify that a git dir either
does not exist, or is at least empty, to fend off attacks where an
inadvertently (and likely maliciously) pre-populated git dir would be
used while cloning submodules recursively.
The logic used `access(<path>, X_OK)` to verify that a directory exists
before calling `is_empty_dir()` on it. That is a curious way to check
for a directory's existence and might well fail for unwanted reasons.
Even the original author (it was I ;-) ) struggles to explain why this
function was used rather than `stat()`.
This code was _almost_ copypastad in the previous commit, but that
`access()` call was caught during review.
Let's use `stat()` instead also in the code that was almost copied
verbatim. Let's not use `lstat()` because in the unlikely event that
somebody snuck a symbolic link in, pointing to a crafted directory, we
want to verify that that directory is empty.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
When creating a submodule path, we must be careful not to follow
symbolic links. Otherwise we may follow a symbolic link pointing to
a gitdir (which are valid symbolic links!) e.g. while cloning.
On case-insensitive filesystems, however, we blindly replace a directory
that has been created as part of the `clone` operation with a symlink
when the path to the latter differs only in case from the former's path.
Let's simply avoid this situation by expecting not ever having to
overwrite any existing file/directory/symlink upon cloning. That way, we
won't even replace a directory that we just created.
This addresses CVE-2024-32002.
Reported-by: Filip Hejsek <filip.hejsek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
While it is expected to have several git dirs within the `.git/modules/`
tree, it is important that they do not interfere with each other. For
example, if one submodule was called "captain" and another submodule
"captain/hooks", their respective git dirs would clash, as they would be
located in `.git/modules/captain/` and `.git/modules/captain/hooks/`,
respectively, i.e. the latter's files could clash with the actual Git
hooks of the former.
To prevent these clashes, and in particular to prevent hooks from being
written and then executed as part of a recursive clone, we introduced
checks as part of the fix for CVE-2019-1387 in a8dee3ca61 (Disallow
dubiously-nested submodule git directories, 2019-10-01).
It is currently possible to bypass the check for clashing submodule
git dirs in two ways:
1. parallel cloning
2. checkout --recurse-submodules
Let's check not only before, but also after parallel cloning (and before
checking out the submodule), that the git dir is not clashing with
another one, otherwise fail. This addresses the parallel cloning issue.
As to the parallel checkout issue: It requires quite a few manual steps
to create clashing git dirs because Git itself would refuse to
initialize the inner one, as demonstrated by the test case.
Nevertheless, let's teach the recursive checkout (namely, the
`submodule_move_head()` function that is used by the recursive checkout)
to be careful to verify that it does not use a clashing git dir, and if
it does, disable it (by deleting the `HEAD` file so that subsequent Git
calls won't recognize it as a git dir anymore).
Note: The parallel cloning test case contains a `cat err` that proved to
be highly useful when analyzing the racy nature of the operation (the
operation can fail with three different error messages, depending on
timing), and was left on purpose to ease future debugging should the
need arise.
Signed-off-by: Filip Hejsek <filip.hejsek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Submodule operations must not follow symlinks in working tree, because
otherwise files might be written to unintended places, leading to
vulnerabilities.
Signed-off-by: Filip Hejsek <filip.hejsek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
There is a bug in directory/file ("D/F") conflict checking optimization:
It assumes that such a conflict cannot happen if a newly added entry's
path is lexicgraphically "greater than" the last already-existing index
entry _and_ contains a directory separator that comes strictly after the
common prefix (`len > len_eq_offset`).
This assumption is incorrect, though: `a-` sorts _between_ `a` and
`a/b`, their common prefix is `a`, the slash comes after the common
prefix, and there is still a file/directory conflict.
Let's re-design this logic, taking these facts into consideration:
- It is impossible for a file to sort after another file with whose
directory it conflicts because the trailing NUL byte is always smaller
than any other character.
- Since there are quite a number of ASCII characters that sort before
the slash (e.g. `-`, `.`, the space character), looking at the last
already-existing index entry is not enough to determine whether there
is a D/F conflict when the first character different from the
existing last index entry's path is a slash.
If it is not a slash, there cannot be a file/directory conflict.
And if the existing index entry's first different character is a
slash, it also cannot be a file/directory conflict because the
optimization requires the newly-added entry's path to sort _after_ the
existing entry's, and the conflicting file's path would not.
So let's fall back to the regular binary search whenever the newly-added
item's path differs in a slash character. If it does not, and it sorts
after the last index entry, there is no D/F conflict and the new index
entry can be safely appended.
This fix also nicely simplifies the logic and makes it much easier to
reason about, while the impact on performance should be negligible:
After this fix, the optimization will be skipped only when index
entry's paths differ in a slash and a space, `!`, `"`, `#`, `$`,
`%`, `&`, `'`, | ( `)`, `*`, `+`, `,`, `-`, or `.`, which should
be a rare situation.
Signed-off-by: Filip Hejsek <filip.hejsek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
For a long time our general philosophy has been that it's unsafe to run
arbitrary Git commands if you don't trust the hooks or config in .git,
but that running upload-pack should be OK. E.g., see 1456b043fc (Remove
post-upload-hook, 2009-12-10), or the design of uploadpack.packObjectsHook.
But we never really documented this (and even the discussions that led
to 1456b043fc were not on the public list!). Let's try to make our
approach more clear, but also be realistic that even upload-pack carries
some risk.
Helped-by: Filip Hejsek <filip.hejsek@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
The upload-pack command tries to avoid trusting the repository in which
it's run (e.g., by not running any hooks and not using any config that
contains arbitrary commands). But if the server side of a fetch or a
clone is a partial clone, then either upload-pack or its child
pack-objects may run a lazy "git fetch" under the hood. And it is very
easy to convince fetch to run arbitrary commands.
The "server" side can be a local repository owned by someone else, who
would be able to configure commands that are run during a clone with the
current user's permissions. This issue has been designated
CVE-2024-32004.
The fix in this commit's parent helps in this scenario, as well as in
related scenarios using SSH to clone, where the untrusted .git directory
is owned by a different user id. But if you received one as a zip file,
on a USB stick, etc, it may be owned by your user but still untrusted.
This has been designated CVE-2024-32465.
To mitigate the issue more completely, let's disable lazy fetching
entirely during `upload-pack`. While fetching from a partial repository
should be relatively rare, it is certainly not an unreasonable workflow.
And thus we need to provide an escape hatch.
This commit works by respecting a GIT_NO_LAZY_FETCH environment variable
(to skip the lazy-fetch), and setting it in upload-pack, but only when
the user has not already done so (which gives us the escape hatch).
The name of the variable is specifically chosen to match what has
already been added in 'master' via e6d5479e7a (git: extend
--no-lazy-fetch to work across subprocesses, 2024-02-27). Since we're
building this fix as a backport for older versions, we could cherry-pick
that patch and its earlier steps. However, we don't really need the
niceties (like a "--no-lazy-fetch" option) that it offers. By using the
same name, everything should just work when the two are eventually
merged, but here are a few notes:
- the blocking of the fetch in e6d5479e7a is incomplete! It sets
fetch_if_missing to 0 when we setup the repository variable, but
that isn't enough. pack-objects in particular will call
prefetch_to_pack() even if that variable is 0. This patch by
contrast checks the environment variable at the lowest level before
we call the lazy fetch, where we can be sure to catch all code
paths.
Possibly the setting of fetch_if_missing from e6d5479e7a can be
reverted, but it may be useful to have. For example, some code may
want to use that flag to change behavior before it gets to the point
of trying to start the fetch. At any rate, that's all outside the
scope of this patch.
- there's documentation for GIT_NO_LAZY_FETCH in e6d5479e7a. We can
live without that here, because for the most part the user shouldn't
need to set it themselves. The exception is if they do want to
override upload-pack's default, and that requires a separate
documentation section (which is added here)
- it would be nice to use the NO_LAZY_FETCH_ENVIRONMENT macro added by
e6d5479e7a, but those definitions have moved from cache.h to
environment.h between 2.39.3 and master. I just used the raw string
literals, and we can replace them with the macro once this topic is
merged to master.
At least with respect to CVE-2024-32004, this does render this commit's
parent commit somewhat redundant. However, it is worth retaining that
commit as defense in depth, and because it may help other issues (e.g.,
symlink/hardlink TOCTOU races, where zip files are not really an
interesting attack vector).
The tests in t0411 still pass, but now we have _two_ mechanisms ensuring
that the evil command is not run. Let's beef up the existing ones to
check that they failed for the expected reason, that we refused to run
upload-pack at all with an alternate user id. And add two new ones for
the same-user case that both the restriction and its escape hatch.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
When cloning from somebody else's repositories, it is possible that,
say, the `upload-pack` command is overridden in the repository that is
about to be cloned, which would then be run in the user's context who
started the clone.
To remind the user that this is a potentially unsafe operation, let's
extend the ownership checks we have already established for regular
gitdir discovery to extend also to local repositories that are about to
be cloned.
This protection extends also to file:// URLs.
The fixes in this commit address CVE-2024-32004.
Note: This commit does not touch the `fetch`/`clone` code directly, but
instead the function used implicitly by both: `enter_repo()`. This
function is also used by `git receive-pack` (i.e. pushes), by `git
upload-archive`, by `git daemon` and by `git http-backend`. In setups
that want to serve repositories owned by different users than the
account running the service, this will require `safe.*` settings to be
configured accordingly.
Also note: there are tiny time windows where a time-of-check-time-of-use
("TOCTOU") race is possible. The real solution to those would be to work
with `fstat()` and `openat()`. However, the latter function is not
available on Windows (and would have to be emulated with rather
expensive low-level `NtCreateFile()` calls), and the changes would be
quite extensive, for my taste too extensive for the little gain given
that embargoed releases need to pay extra attention to avoid introducing
inadvertent bugs.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Cloning from a partial repository must not fetch missing objects into
the partial repository, because that can lead to arbitrary code
execution.
Add a couple of test cases, pretending to the `upload-pack` command (and
to that command only) that it is working on a repository owned by
someone else.
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Filip Hejsek <filip.hejsek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
When performing a local clone of a repository we end up either copying
or hardlinking the source repository into the target repository. This is
significantly more performant than if we were to use git-upload-pack(1)
and git-fetch-pack(1) to create the new repository and preserves both
disk space and compute time.
Unfortunately though, performing such a local clone of a repository that
is not owned by the current user is inherently unsafe:
- It is possible that source files get swapped out underneath us while
we are copying or hardlinking them. While we do perform some checks
here to assert that we hardlinked the expected file, they cannot
reliably thwart time-of-check-time-of-use (TOCTOU) style races. It
is thus possible for an adversary to make us copy or hardlink
unexpected files into the target directory.
Ideally, we would address this by starting to use openat(3P),
fstatat(3P) and friends. Due to platform compatibility with Windows
we cannot easily do that though. Furthermore, the scope of these
fixes would likely be quite broad and thus not fit for an embargoed
security release.
- Even if we handled TOCTOU-style races perfectly, hardlinking files
owned by a different user into the target repository is not a good
idea in general. It is possible for an adversary to rewrite those
files to contain whatever data they want even after the clone has
completed.
Address these issues by completely refusing local clones of a repository
that is not owned by the current user. This reuses our existing infra we
have in place via `ensure_valid_ownership()` and thus allows a user to
override the safety guard by adding the source repository path to the
"safe.directory" configuration.
This addresses CVE-2024-32020.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Introduce a new function `die_upon_dubious_ownership()` that uses
`ensure_valid_ownership()` to verify whether a repositroy is safe for
use, and causes Git to die in case it is not.
This function will be used in a subsequent commit.
Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
When performing local clones with hardlinks we refuse to copy source
files which are symlinks as a mitigation for CVE-2022-39253. This check
can be raced by an adversary though by changing the file to a symlink
after we have checked it.
Fix the issue by checking whether the hardlinked destination file
matches the source file and abort in case it doesn't.
This addresses CVE-2024-32021.
Reported-by: Apple Product Security <product-security@apple.com>
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
When a user performs a local clone without `--no-local`, then we end up
copying the source repository into the target repository directly. To
optimize this even further, we try to hardlink files into place instead
of copying data over, which helps both disk usage and speed.
There is an important edge case in this context though, namely when we
try to hardlink symlinks from the source repository into the target
repository. Depending on both platform and filesystem the resulting
behaviour here can be different:
- On macOS and NetBSD, calling link(3P) with a symlink target creates
a hardlink to the file pointed to by the symlink.
- On Linux, calling link(3P) instead creates a hardlink to the symlink
itself.
To unify this behaviour, 36596fd2df (clone: better handle symlinked
files at .git/objects/, 2019-07-10) introduced logic to resolve symlinks
before we try to link(3P) files. Consequently, the new behaviour was to
always create a hard link to the target of the symlink on all platforms.
Eventually though, we figured out that following symlinks like this can
cause havoc when performing a local clone of a malicious repository,
which resulted in CVE-2022-39253. This issue was fixed via 6f054f9fb3
(builtin/clone.c: disallow `--local` clones with symlinks, 2022-07-28),
by refusing symlinks in the source repository.
But even though we now shouldn't ever link symlinks anymore, the code
that resolves symlinks still exists. In the best case the code does not
end up doing anything because there are no symlinks anymore. In the
worst case though this can be abused by an adversary that rewrites the
source file after it has been checked not to be a symlink such that it
actually is a symlink when we call link(3P). Thus, it is still possible
to recreate CVE-2022-39253 due to this time-of-check-time-of-use bug.
Remove the call to `realpath()`. This doesn't yet address the actual
vulnerability, which will be handled in a subsequent commit.
Reported-by: Apple Product Security <product-security@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Update remaining GitHub Actions jobs to avoid warnings against
using deprecated version of Node.js.
* js/github-actions-update:
ci(linux32): add a note about Actions that must not be updated
ci: bump remaining outdated Actions versions
With this backport, `maint-2.39`'s CI builds are finally healthy again.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
