affected struct:
- sockaddr_storage
- sockaddr_un
apply the same method used for linux for:
- bitrig/openbsd
- freebsd
- dragonfly
this commit unbreak build for openbsd (and bitrig, freebsd and dragonfly too I think)
r? @alexcrichton
This is the first use of `box`. It's an unstable feature and also isn't
consistent with the use of `Box` in the "original" code above it.
r? @steveklabnik
This commit renames and stabilizes:
* `Condvar::wait_timeout_ms` (renamed from `wait_timeout`)
* `thread::park_timeout_ms` (renamed from `park_timeout`)
* `thread::sleep_ms` (renamed from `sleep`)
In each case, the timeout is taken as a `u32` number of milliseconds,
rather than a `Duration`.
These functions are likely to be deprecated once a stable form of
`Duration` is available, but there is little cost to having these named
variants around, and it's crucial functionality for 1.0.
[breaking-change]
r? @alexcrichton
cc @sfackler @carllerche
This commit renames and stabilizes:
* `Condvar::wait_timeout_ms` (renamed from `wait_timeout`)
* `thread::park_timeout_ms` (renamed from `park_timeout`)
* `thread::sleep_ms` (renamed from `sleep`)
In each case, the timeout is taken as a `u32` number of milliseconds,
rather than a `Duration`.
These functions are likely to be deprecated once a stable form of
`Duration` is available, but there is little cost to having these named
variants around, and it's crucial functionality for 1.0.
[breaking-change]
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 979][rfc] which changes the meaning of
the count parameter to the `splitn` function on strings and slices. The
parameter now means the number of items that are returned from the iterator, not
the number of splits that are made.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/979Closes#23911
[breaking-change]
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 979][rfc] which changes the meaning of
the count parameter to the `splitn` function on strings and slices. The
parameter now means the number of items that are returned from the iterator, not
the number of splits that are made.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/979Closes#23911
[breaking-change]
Recent numerics stabilization removed the inherent `min_value` and
`max_value` methods from integer types, assuming that the module-level
constants would suffice. However, that failed to account for the use
case in FFI code when dealing with integer type aliases.
This commit reintroduces the methods as `#[stable]`, since this is
essential functionality for 1.0.
It's unfortunate to freeze these as methods, but when we can provide
inherent associated constants these methods can be deprecated.
r? @sfackler
cc @alexcrichton
This PR implements rust-lang/rfcs#1023. In the process it fixes#23086 and #23516. A few impls in libcore had to be updated, but the impact is generally pretty minimal. Most of the fallout is in the tests that probed the limits of today's coherence.
I tested and we were able to build the most popular crates along with iron (modulo errors around errors being sendable).
Fixes#23918.
Recent numerics stabilization removed the inherent `min_value` and
`max_value` methods from integer types, assuming that the module-level
constants would suffice. However, that failed to account for the use
case in FFI code when dealing with integer type aliases.
This commit reintroduces the methods as `#[stable]`, since this is
essential functionality for 1.0.
It's unfortunate to freeze these as methods, but when we can provide
inherent associated constants these methods can be deprecated.
