Keep track of the outargs size needed at each call.
Compute the size of the outargs section of the stack frame. It's just
the max of the outargs size at all the callsites in the function.
Change-Id: I3d0640f654f01307633b1a5f75bab16e211ea6c0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12178
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
If we've already hit an Unimplemented, there may be important
SSA invariants that do not hold and which could cause
ssa.Compile to hang or spin.
While we're here, make detected dependency cycles stop execution.
Change-Id: Ic7d4eea659e1fe3f2c9b3e8a4eee5567494f46ad
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12310
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Implement ODOT. Similar to ArrayIndex, StructSelect selects a field
out of a larger Value.
We may need more ways to rewrite StructSelect, but StructSelect/Load
is the typical way it is used.
Change-Id: Ida7b8aab3298f4754eaf9fee733974cf8736e45d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12265
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Phi ops should always be scheduled first. They have the semantics
of all happening simultaneously at the start of the block. The regalloc
phase assumes all the phis will appear first.
Change-Id: I30291e1fa384a0819205218f1d1ec3aef6d538dd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12154
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Joint hacking with josharian. Hints from matloob and Todd Neal.
Now with tests, and OROR.
Change-Id: Iff8826fde475691fb72a3eea7396a640b6274af9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12041
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
An empty label statement can just be ignored, as it cannot
be the target of any gotos.
Tests are already in test/fixedbugs/issue7538*.go
Fixes#11589Fixes#11593
Change-Id: Iadcd639e7200ce16aa40fd7fa3eaf82522513e82
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12093
Reviewed-by: Daniel Morsing <daniel.morsing@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
And dependent fixes and misc cleanup.
Co-hacking with josharian at Gophercon.
Change-Id: Ib85dc13b303929017eb0a4d2fc2f603485f7479b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12027
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
If an expression has an Ninit list, generate code for it.
Required for (at least) OANDAND.
Change-Id: I94c9e22e2a76955736f4a8e574d92711419c5e5c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12072
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
removePredecessor can change which blocks are live.
However, it cannot remove dead blocks from the function's
slice of blocks because removePredecessor may have been
called from within a function doing a walk of the blocks.
CL 11879 did not handle this correctly and broke the build.
To fix this, mark the block as dead but leave its actual
removal for a deadcode pass. Blocks that are dead must have
no successors, predecessors, values, or control values,
so they will generally be ignored by other passes.
To be safe, we add a deadcode pass after the opt pass,
which is the only other pass that calls removePredecessor.
Two alternatives that I considered and discarded:
(1) Make all call sites aware of the fact that removePrecessor
might make arbitrary changes to the list of blocks. This
will needlessly complicate callers.
(2) Handle the things that can go wrong in practice when
we encounter a dead-but-not-removed block. CL 11930 takes
this approach (and the tests are stolen from that CL).
However, this is just patching over the problem.
Change-Id: Icf0687b0a8148ce5e96b2988b668804411b05bd8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12004
Reviewed-by: Todd Neal <todd@tneal.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Matloob <michaelmatloob@gmail.com>
Reduces 'go run run.go 64bit.go' from 23s to 8s on my machine.
Change-Id: Ie5b642d0abb56e8eb3899d69472bc88a85a1c985
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12023
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This is a prerequisite for implementing break and continue;
blocks ending in break or continue need to have
the increment block as a successor.
While we're here, implement for loops with no condition.
Change-Id: I85d8ba020628d805bfd0bd583dfd16e1be6f6fae
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11941
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This change has some tests verifying functionality and an assortment of
benchmarks of various block lists. It modifies NewBlock to allocate in
contiguous blocks improving the performance of intersect() for extremely
large graphs by 30-40%.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkDominatorsLinear-8 1185619 901154 -23.99%
BenchmarkDominatorsFwdBack-8 1302138 863537 -33.68%
BenchmarkDominatorsManyPred-8 404670521 247450911 -38.85%
BenchmarkDominatorsMaxPred-8 455809002 471675119 +3.48%
BenchmarkDominatorsMaxPredVal-8 819315864 468257300 -42.85%
BenchmarkNilCheckDeep1-8 766 706 -7.83%
BenchmarkNilCheckDeep10-8 2553 2209 -13.47%
BenchmarkNilCheckDeep100-8 58606 57545 -1.81%
BenchmarkNilCheckDeep1000-8 7753012 8025750 +3.52%
BenchmarkNilCheckDeep10000-8 1224165946 789995184 -35.47%
Change-Id: Id3d6bc9cb1138e8177934441073ac7873ddf7ade
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11716
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The removal of if false { ... } blocks in the opt
pass exposed that removePredecessor needed
to do more cleaning, on pain of failing later
consistency checks.
Change-Id: I45d4ff7e1f7f1486fdd99f867867ce6ea006a288
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11879
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Loops such as
func f(c chan int) int {
for x := range c {
return x
}
return 0
}
don't loop. Remove the assumption that they must.
Partly fixes the build.
Change-Id: I766cebeec8e36d14512bea26f54c06c8eaf95e23
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11876
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
There is clearly work to do to fix labels and gotos.
The compiler currently hangs on ken/label.go.
For the moment, stop the bleeding.
Fixes the build.
Change-Id: Ib68360d583cf53e1a8ca4acff50644b570382728
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11877
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Partly fixes the build, by punting.
Other things have broken in the meantime.
Change-Id: I1e2b8310057cbbbd9ffc501ef51e744690e00726
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11875
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Doesn't fix the build entirely, but does make it get to the race
detector tests.
Change-Id: Ie986d52374936855b7ee975dc68742306527eb15
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11835
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
These additional checks were useful in
tracking down the broken build (CL 11238).
This CL does not fix the build, sadly.
Change-Id: I34de3bed223f450aaa97c1cadaba2e4e5850050b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11681
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This will make it possible for us to start implementing interfaces
and other stack allocated types which are more than one machine word.
Change-Id: I52b187a791cf1919cb70ed6dabdc9f57b317ea83
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11631
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Forgot to add this in the tip merge.
Change-Id: I0e5a2681133f4ae7a7c360ae2c2d71d46420c693
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11793
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Everything in the library but crypto and net.
Change-Id: I89b21b9621e6d338fa1891da0eabba5d7d2fe349
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11820
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Adding a mutex was easier than documenting it, and is consistent with
gob.
Fixes#9847
Change-Id: Ifa94c17e7c11643add81b35431ef840b794d78b1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11682
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The optional Qualifier function determines what prefix to attach to
package-level names, enabling clients to qualify packages in different
ways, for example, using only the package name instead of its complete
path, or using the locally appropriate name for package given a set of
(possibly renaming) imports.
Prior to this change, clients wanting this behavior had to copy
hundreds of lines of complex printing logic.
Fun fact: (*types.Package).Path and (*types.Package).Name are valid
Qualifier functions.
We provide the RelativeTo helper function to create Qualifiers so that
the old behavior remains a one-liner.
Fixesgolang/go#11133
This CL is a copy of https://go-review.googlesource.com/#/c/11692/
to the golang.org/x/tools repository.
Change-Id: I26d0f3644d077a26bfe350989f9c545f018eefbf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11790
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
We can't address more than this on amd64 anyway.
Fixes#9862.
Change-Id: Ifb1abae558e2e1ee2dc953a76995f3f08c60b1df
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11715
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Compiling a simple file containing a slice of 100,000 strings,
the size of the resulting binary dropped from 5,896,224 bytes
to 3,495,968 bytes, which is the expected 2,400,000 bytes,
give or take.
Fixes#7384.
Change-Id: I3e551b5a1395b523a41b33518d81a1bf28da0906
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11698
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
This was originally done in https://codereview.appspot.com/5690059
(Feb 2012) to deal with bad response headers coming back from webcams,
but it presents a potential security problem with HTTP request
smuggling for request headers containing "Content Length" instead of
"Content-Length".
Part of overall HTTP hardening for request smuggling. See RFC 7230.
Thanks to Régis Leroy for the report.
Change-Id: I92b17fb637c9171c5774ea1437979ae2c17ca88a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11772
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
If you have more than 10 procs, then currently they are sorted alphabetically as
0, 10, 11, ..., 19, 2, 20, ...
Assign explicit order to procs so that they are sorted numerically.
Change-Id: I6d978d2cd439aa2fcbcf147842a643f9073eef75
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11750
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
