4.7 KiB
fd
fd is a simple, fast and user-friendly alternative to find.
While it does not seek to mirror all of find's powerful functionality, it provides sensible (opinionated) defaults for 80% of the use cases.
Features
- Convenient syntax:
fd PATTERN
instead offind -iname '*PATTERN*'
. - Colorized terminal output (similar to ls).
- It's fast (see benchmarks below).
- Smart case: the search is case-insensitive by default. It switches to case-sensitive if the pattern contains an uppercase character*.
- Ignores hidden directories and files, by default.
- Ignores patterns from your
.gitignore
, by default. - Regular expressions.
- Unicode-awareness.
- The command name is 50% shorter* than
find
:-).
Demo
Colorized output
fd
can colorize files by extension, just like ls
. In order for this to work, the environment
variable LS_COLORS
has to be set. Typically, the value
of this variable is set by the dircolors
command which provides a convenient configuration format
to define colors for different file formats.
On most distributions, LS_COLORS
should be set already. If you are looking for alternative, more
complete (and more colorful) variants, see
here or
here.
Benchmark
Let's search my home folder for files that end in [0-9].jpg
. It contains ~150.000
subdirectories and about a million files. For averaging and statistical analysis, I'm using
bench. All benchmarks are performed for a "warm
cache". Results for a cold cache are similar.
Let's start with find
:
find ~ -iregex '.*[0-9]\.jpg$'
time 6.265 s (6.127 s .. NaN s)
1.000 R² (1.000 R² .. 1.000 R²)
mean 6.162 s (6.140 s .. 6.181 s)
std dev 31.73 ms (0.0 s .. 33.48 ms)
find
is much faster if it does not need to perform a regular-expression search:
find ~ -iname '*[0-9].jpg'
time 2.866 s (2.754 s .. 2.964 s)
1.000 R² (0.999 R² .. 1.000 R²)
mean 2.860 s (2.834 s .. 2.875 s)
std dev 23.11 ms (0.0 s .. 25.09 ms)
Now let's try the same for fd
. Note that fd
always performs a regular expression
search. The options --hidden
and --no-ignore
are needed for a fair comparison,
otherwise fd
does not have to traverse hidden folders and ignored paths (see below):
fd --hidden --no-ignore '.*[0-9]\.jpg$' ~
time 892.6 ms (839.0 ms .. 915.4 ms)
0.999 R² (0.997 R² .. 1.000 R²)
mean 871.2 ms (857.9 ms .. 881.3 ms)
std dev 15.50 ms (0.0 s .. 17.49 ms)
For this particular example, fd
is approximately seven times faster than find -iregex
and about three times faster than find -iname
. By the way, both tools found the exact
same 14030 files 😄.
Finally, let's run fd
without --hidden
and --no-ignore
(this can lead to different
search results, of course):
fd '[0-9]\.jpg$' ~
time 159.5 ms (155.8 ms .. 165.3 ms)
0.999 R² (0.996 R² .. 1.000 R²)
mean 158.7 ms (156.5 ms .. 161.6 ms)
std dev 3.263 ms (2.401 ms .. 4.298 ms)
Note: This is one particular benchmark on one particular machine. While I have performed quite a lot of different tests (and found consistent results), things might be different for you! I encourage everyone to try it out on their own.
Concerning fd's speed, the main credit goes to the regex
and ignore
crates that are also used
in ripgrep (check it out!).
Install
With Rust's package manager cargo, you can clone, build and install fd with a single command:
cargo install --git https://github.com/sharkdp/fd
Note that rust version 1.16.0 or later is required. The release page of this repository also includes precompiled binaries for Linux.
On OS X, you can use homebrew:
brew install fd
On Arch Linux, you can install the AUR package fd-rs-git via yaourt, or manually:
git clone https://aur.archlinux.org/fd-rs-git.git
cd fd-rs-git
makepkg -si
Development
cargo build --release