serenity/AK/Tests/TestDistinctNumeric.cpp
Andreas Kling acf341862a AK: Remove operators && and || from DistinctNumeric
These don't do short-circuit evaluation, and so I ran into some
some very subtle side-effects when converting code to DistinctNumeric.

In code like this:

    MyDistinctNumeric n;
    if (n && check_thing(n))
        return;

There would be no short-circuit evaluation if the return type of
check_thing() was implicitly convertible to MyDistinctNumeric.

Ran into this while making Ext2FS::GroupIndex a DistinctNumeric.
2021-02-12 13:27:48 +01:00

308 lines
10 KiB
C++
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

/*
* Copyright (c) 2020, Ben Wiederhake <BenWiederhake.GitHub@gmx.de>
* All rights reserved.
*
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
*
* 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this
* list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
*
* 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice,
* this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation
* and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
*
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS"
* AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
* IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE
* DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
* FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
* DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR
* SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER
* CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY,
* OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
* OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
*/
#include <AK/TestSuite.h>
#include <AK/DistinctNumeric.h>
template<typename T>
class ForType {
public:
static void check_size()
{
TYPEDEF_DISTINCT_NUMERIC_GENERAL(T, false, false, false, false, false, false, TheNumeric);
EXPECT_EQ(sizeof(T), sizeof(TheNumeric));
}
};
TEST_CASE(check_size)
{
#define CHECK_SIZE_FOR_SIGNABLE(T) \
do { \
ForType<signed T>::check_size(); \
ForType<unsigned T>::check_size(); \
} while (false)
CHECK_SIZE_FOR_SIGNABLE(char);
CHECK_SIZE_FOR_SIGNABLE(short);
CHECK_SIZE_FOR_SIGNABLE(int);
CHECK_SIZE_FOR_SIGNABLE(long);
CHECK_SIZE_FOR_SIGNABLE(long long);
ForType<float>::check_size();
ForType<double>::check_size();
}
TYPEDEF_DISTINCT_NUMERIC_GENERAL(int, false, false, false, false, false, false, BareNumeric);
TYPEDEF_DISTINCT_NUMERIC_GENERAL(int, true, false, false, false, false, false, IncrNumeric);
TYPEDEF_DISTINCT_NUMERIC_GENERAL(int, false, true, false, false, false, false, CmpNumeric);
TYPEDEF_DISTINCT_NUMERIC_GENERAL(int, false, false, true, false, false, false, BoolNumeric);
TYPEDEF_DISTINCT_NUMERIC_GENERAL(int, false, false, false, true, false, false, FlagsNumeric);
TYPEDEF_DISTINCT_NUMERIC_GENERAL(int, false, false, false, false, true, false, ShiftNumeric);
TYPEDEF_DISTINCT_NUMERIC_GENERAL(int, false, false, false, false, false, true, ArithNumeric);
TYPEDEF_DISTINCT_NUMERIC_GENERAL(int, true, true, true, true, true, true, GeneralNumeric);
TEST_CASE(address_identity)
{
BareNumeric a = 4;
BareNumeric b = 5;
EXPECT_EQ(&a == &a, true);
EXPECT_EQ(&a == &b, false);
EXPECT_EQ(&a != &a, false);
EXPECT_EQ(&a != &b, true);
}
TEST_CASE(operator_identity)
{
BareNumeric a = 4;
BareNumeric b = 5;
EXPECT_EQ(a == a, true);
EXPECT_EQ(a == b, false);
EXPECT_EQ(a != a, false);
EXPECT_EQ(a != b, true);
}
TEST_CASE(operator_incr)
{
IncrNumeric a = 4;
IncrNumeric b = 5;
IncrNumeric c = 6;
EXPECT_EQ(++a, b);
EXPECT_EQ(a++, b);
EXPECT_EQ(a, c);
EXPECT_EQ(--a, b);
EXPECT_EQ(a--, b);
EXPECT(a != b);
}
TEST_CASE(operator_cmp)
{
CmpNumeric a = 4;
CmpNumeric b = 5;
CmpNumeric c = 5;
EXPECT_EQ(a > b, false);
EXPECT_EQ(a < b, true);
EXPECT_EQ(a >= b, false);
EXPECT_EQ(a <= b, true);
EXPECT_EQ(b > a, true);
EXPECT_EQ(b < a, false);
EXPECT_EQ(b >= a, true);
EXPECT_EQ(b <= a, false);
EXPECT_EQ(b > c, false);
EXPECT_EQ(b < c, false);
EXPECT_EQ(b >= c, true);
EXPECT_EQ(b <= c, true);
}
TEST_CASE(operator_bool)
{
BoolNumeric a = 0;
BoolNumeric b = 42;
BoolNumeric c = 1337;
EXPECT_EQ(!a, true);
EXPECT_EQ(!b, false);
EXPECT_EQ(!c, false);
}
TEST_CASE(operator_flags)
{
FlagsNumeric a = 0;
FlagsNumeric b = 0xA60;
FlagsNumeric c = 0x03B;
EXPECT_EQ(~a, FlagsNumeric(~0x0));
EXPECT_EQ(~b, FlagsNumeric(~0xA60));
EXPECT_EQ(~c, FlagsNumeric(~0x03B));
EXPECT_EQ(a & b, b & a);
EXPECT_EQ(a & c, c & a);
EXPECT_EQ(b & c, c & b);
EXPECT_EQ(a | b, b | a);
EXPECT_EQ(a | c, c | a);
EXPECT_EQ(b | c, c | b);
EXPECT_EQ(a ^ b, b ^ a);
EXPECT_EQ(a ^ c, c ^ a);
EXPECT_EQ(b ^ c, c ^ b);
EXPECT_EQ(a & b, FlagsNumeric(0x000));
EXPECT_EQ(a & c, FlagsNumeric(0x000));
EXPECT_EQ(b & c, FlagsNumeric(0x020));
EXPECT_EQ(a | b, FlagsNumeric(0xA60));
EXPECT_EQ(a | c, FlagsNumeric(0x03B));
EXPECT_EQ(b | c, FlagsNumeric(0xA7B));
EXPECT_EQ(a ^ b, FlagsNumeric(0xA60));
EXPECT_EQ(a ^ c, FlagsNumeric(0x03B));
EXPECT_EQ(b ^ c, FlagsNumeric(0xA5B));
EXPECT_EQ(a &= b, FlagsNumeric(0x000));
EXPECT_EQ(a, FlagsNumeric(0x000));
EXPECT_EQ(a |= b, FlagsNumeric(0xA60));
EXPECT_EQ(a, FlagsNumeric(0xA60));
EXPECT_EQ(a &= c, FlagsNumeric(0x020));
EXPECT_EQ(a, FlagsNumeric(0x020));
EXPECT_EQ(a ^= b, FlagsNumeric(0xA40));
EXPECT_EQ(a, FlagsNumeric(0xA40));
EXPECT_EQ(b, FlagsNumeric(0xA60));
EXPECT_EQ(c, FlagsNumeric(0x03B));
}
TEST_CASE(operator_shift)
{
ShiftNumeric a = 0x040;
EXPECT_EQ(a << ShiftNumeric(0), ShiftNumeric(0x040));
EXPECT_EQ(a << ShiftNumeric(1), ShiftNumeric(0x080));
EXPECT_EQ(a << ShiftNumeric(2), ShiftNumeric(0x100));
EXPECT_EQ(a >> ShiftNumeric(0), ShiftNumeric(0x040));
EXPECT_EQ(a >> ShiftNumeric(1), ShiftNumeric(0x020));
EXPECT_EQ(a >> ShiftNumeric(2), ShiftNumeric(0x010));
EXPECT_EQ(a <<= ShiftNumeric(5), ShiftNumeric(0x800));
EXPECT_EQ(a, ShiftNumeric(0x800));
EXPECT_EQ(a >>= ShiftNumeric(8), ShiftNumeric(0x008));
EXPECT_EQ(a, ShiftNumeric(0x008));
}
TEST_CASE(operator_arith)
{
ArithNumeric a = 12;
ArithNumeric b = 345;
EXPECT_EQ(a + b, ArithNumeric(357));
EXPECT_EQ(b + a, ArithNumeric(357));
EXPECT_EQ(a - b, ArithNumeric(-333));
EXPECT_EQ(b - a, ArithNumeric(333));
EXPECT_EQ(+a, ArithNumeric(12));
EXPECT_EQ(-a, ArithNumeric(-12));
EXPECT_EQ(a * b, ArithNumeric(4140));
EXPECT_EQ(b * a, ArithNumeric(4140));
EXPECT_EQ(a / b, ArithNumeric(0));
EXPECT_EQ(b / a, ArithNumeric(28));
EXPECT_EQ(a % b, ArithNumeric(12));
EXPECT_EQ(b % a, ArithNumeric(9));
EXPECT_EQ(a += a, ArithNumeric(24));
EXPECT_EQ(a, ArithNumeric(24));
EXPECT_EQ(a *= a, ArithNumeric(576));
EXPECT_EQ(a, ArithNumeric(576));
EXPECT_EQ(a /= a, ArithNumeric(1));
EXPECT_EQ(a, ArithNumeric(1));
EXPECT_EQ(a %= a, ArithNumeric(0));
EXPECT_EQ(a, ArithNumeric(0));
}
TEST_CASE(composability)
{
GeneralNumeric a = 0;
GeneralNumeric b = 1;
// Ident
EXPECT_EQ(a == a, true);
EXPECT_EQ(a == b, false);
// Incr
EXPECT_EQ(++a, b);
EXPECT_EQ(a--, b);
EXPECT_EQ(a == b, false);
// Cmp
EXPECT_EQ(a < b, true);
EXPECT_EQ(a >= b, false);
// Bool
EXPECT_EQ(!a, true);
// Flags
EXPECT_EQ(a & b, GeneralNumeric(0));
EXPECT_EQ(a | b, GeneralNumeric(1));
// Shift
EXPECT_EQ(b << GeneralNumeric(4), GeneralNumeric(0x10));
EXPECT_EQ(b >> b, GeneralNumeric(0));
// Arith
EXPECT_EQ(-b, GeneralNumeric(-1));
EXPECT_EQ(a + b, b);
EXPECT_EQ(b * GeneralNumeric(42), GeneralNumeric(42));
}
/*
* FIXME: These `negative_*` tests should cause precisely one compilation error
* each, and always for the specified reason. Currently we do not have a harness
* for that, so in order to run the test you need to set the #define to 1, compile
* it, and check the error messages manually.
*/
#define COMPILE_NEGATIVE_TESTS 0
#if COMPILE_NEGATIVE_TESTS
TEST_CASE(negative_incr)
{
BareNumeric a = 12;
a++;
// error: static assertion failed: 'a++' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Incr'.
}
TEST_CASE(negative_cmp)
{
BareNumeric a = 12;
[[maybe_unused]] auto res = (a < a);
// error: static assertion failed: 'a<b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Cmp'.
}
TEST_CASE(negative_bool)
{
BareNumeric a = 12;
[[maybe_unused]] auto res = !a;
// error: static assertion failed: '!a', 'a&&b', 'a||b' and similar operators are only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Bool'.
}
TEST_CASE(negative_flags)
{
BareNumeric a = 12;
[[maybe_unused]] auto res = (a & a);
// error: static assertion failed: 'a&b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Flags'.
}
TEST_CASE(negative_shift)
{
BareNumeric a = 12;
[[maybe_unused]] auto res = (a << a);
// error: static assertion failed: 'a<<b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Shift'.
}
TEST_CASE(negative_arith)
{
BareNumeric a = 12;
[[maybe_unused]] auto res = (a + a);
// error: static assertion failed: 'a+b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Arith'.
}
TEST_CASE(negative_incompatible)
{
GeneralNumeric a = 12;
ArithNumeric b = 345;
// And this is the entire point of `DistinctNumeric`:
// Theoretically, the operation *could* be supported, but we declared those int types incompatible.
[[maybe_unused]] auto res = (a + b);
// error: no match for operator+ (operand types are GeneralNumeric {aka AK::DistinctNumeric<int, true, true, true, true, true, true, 64, 64>} and ArithNumeric {aka AK::DistinctNumeric<int, false, false, false, false, false, true, 64, 63>})
// 313 | [[maybe_unused]] auto res = (a + b);
// | ~ ^ ~
// | | |
// | | DistinctNumeric<[...],false,false,false,false,false,[...],[...],63>
// | DistinctNumeric<[...],true,true,true,true,true,[...],[...],64>
}
#endif /* COMPILE_NEGATIVE_TESTS */
TEST_MAIN(DistinctNumeric)