The PNV I2C engines for power9 and power10 were being assigned a base
XSCOM address that was off by one I2C engine's address range such
that engine 0 had engine 1's address and so on. The xscom address
assignment was being based on the device tree engine numbering, which
starts at 1. Rather than changing the device tree numbering to start
with 0, the addressing was changed to be based on the existing device
tree numbers minus one.
Fixes: 1ceda19c28 ("ppc/pnv: Connect PNV I2C controller to powernv10)
Signed-off-by: Glenn Miles <milesg@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Power9 is supposed to have 4 PIB-connected I2C engines with the
following number of ports on each engine:
0: 2
1: 13
2: 2
3: 2
Power10 also has 4 engines but has the following number of ports
on each engine:
0: 14
1: 14
2: 2
3: 16
Current code assumes that they all have the same (maximum) number.
This can be a problem if software expects to see a certain number
of ports present (Power Hypervisor seems to care).
Fixed this by adding separate tables for power9 and power10 that
map the I2C controller number to the number of I2C buses that should
be attached for that engine.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Glenn Miles <milesg@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <20231025152714.956664-1-milesg@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Wires up four I2C controller instances to the powernv10 chip
XSCOM address space.
Each controller instance is wired up to two I2C buses of
its own. No other I2C devices are connected to the buses
at this time.
Signed-off-by: Glenn Miles <milesg@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-ID: <20231017221434.810363-1-milesg@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Wires up three I2C controller instances to the powernv9 chip
XSCOM address space.
Each controller instance is wired up to a single I2C bus of
its own. No other I2C devices are connected to the buses
at this time.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
[milesg: Split wiring from addition of model itself]
[milesg: Added new commit message]
[milesg: Moved hardcoded attributes into PnvChipClass]
[milesg: Removed TODO comment for I2C]
Signed-off-by: Glenn Miles <milesg@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20231016222013.3739530-3-milesg@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
There is no point in exposing an internal MMIO region via
SysBus and directly mapping it in the very same device.
Just map it without using the SysBus API.
Transformation done using the following coccinelle script:
@@
expression sbdev;
expression index;
expression addr;
expression subregion;
@@
- sysbus_init_mmio(sbdev, subregion);
... when != sbdev
- sysbus_mmio_map(sbdev, index, addr);
+ memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), addr, subregion);
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20231019131647.19690-6-philmd@linaro.org>
In order to make the next commit trivial, move sysbus_init_mmio()
calls just before the corresponding sysbus_mmio_map() calls.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20231019131647.19690-4-philmd@linaro.org>
pnv_xscom_realize() is not used to *realize* QDev object, rename
it as pnv_xscom_init(). The Error** argument is unused: remove it.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20231019131647.19690-3-philmd@linaro.org>
The Quad Management Engine (QME) manages power related settings for its
quad. The xscom region is separate from the quad xscoms, therefore a new
region is added. The xscoms in a QME select a given core by selecting
the forth nibble.
Implement dummy reads for the stop state history (SSH) and special
wakeup (SPWU) registers. This quietens some sxcom errors when skiboot
boots on p10.
Power9 does not have a QME.
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Message-ID: <20230707071213.9924-1-joel@jms.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Set the TIR default value with the SMT thread index, and place some
standard limits on SMT configurations. Now powernv is able to boot
skiboot and Linux with a SMT topology, including booting a KVM guest.
There are several SPRs and other features (e.g., broadcast msgsnd)
that are not implemented, but not used by OPAL or Linux and can be
added incrementally.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Tested-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20230705120631.27670-4-npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Add a PnvQuad class for the P10 powernv machine. No xscoms are
implemented yet, but this allows them to be added.
The size is reduced to avoid the quad region from overlapping with the
core region.
address-space: xscom-0
0000000000000000-00000003ffffffff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-0
0000000100000000-00000001000fffff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-quad.0
0000000100108000-0000000100907fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.3
0000000100110000-000000010090ffff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.2
0000000100120000-000000010091ffff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.1
0000000100140000-000000010093ffff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.0
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <20230704054204.168547-4-joel@jms.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Make the existing pnv_quad_xscom_read/write be P9 specific, in
preparation for a different P10 callback.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <20230704054204.168547-3-joel@jms.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
POWER9 DD2.1 and earlier had significant limitations when running KVM,
including lack of "mixed mode" MMU support (ability to run HPT and RPT
mode on threads of the same core), and a translation prefetch issue
which is worked around by disabling "AIL" mode for the guest.
These processors are not widely available, and it's difficult to deal
with all these quirks in qemu +/- KVM, so create a POWER9 DD2.2 CPU
and make it the default POWER9 CPU.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20230515160201.394587-1-npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
When instantiating a user-created PHB on P9/P10, we don't really have
a reason any more to go through an indirection in pnv_chip_add_phb()
in pnv.c, we can go straight to the right function in
pnv_phb4_pec.c. That way, default PHBs and user-created PHBs are all
handled in the same file. This patch also renames pnv_phb4_get_pec()
to pnv_pec_add_phb() to better reflect that it "hooks" a PHB to a PEC.
For P8, the PHBs are parented to the chip directly, so it makes sense
to keep calling pnv_chip_add_phb() in pnv.c, to also be consistent
with where default PHBs are handled. The only change here is that,
since that function is now only used for P8, we can refine the return
type.
So overall, the PnvPHB front-end now has a pnv_phb_user_get_parent()
function which handles the parenting of the user-created PHBs by
calling the right function in the right file based on the processor
version. It's also easily extensible if we ever need to support a
different parent object.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20230302163715.129635-5-fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
The function pnv_phb4_get_pec() exposes some internals of the PEC and
PHB logic, yet it was in the higher level hw/ppc/pnv.c file for
historical reasons: P8 implements the PHBs from pnv.c directly, but on
P9/P10, it's done through the CEC model, which has its own file. So
move pnv_phb4_get_pec() to hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c, where it fits
naturally.
While at it, replace the PnvPHB4 parameter by the PnvPHB front-end,
since it has all the information needed and simplify it a bit.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20230302163715.129635-4-fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Add an array on the PEC object to keep track of the PHBs which are
instantiated. The array can be sparsely populated when using
user-created PHBs. It will be useful for the next patch to only export
instantiated PHBs in the device tree.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20230302163715.129635-2-fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
PnvChipClass, PnvChip, Pnv8Chip, Pnv9Chip, and Pnv10Chip are defined
in pnv.h. Many users of the header don't actually need them. One
instance is this inclusion loop: hw/ppc/pnv_homer.h includes
hw/ppc/pnv.h for typedef PnvChip, and vice versa for struct PnvHomer.
Similar structs live in their own headers: PnvHomerClass and PnvHomer
in pnv_homer.h, PnvLpcClass and PnvLpcController in pci_lpc.h,
PnvPsiClass, PnvPsi, Pnv8Psi, Pnv9Psi, Pnv10Psi in pnv_psi.h, ...
Move PnvChipClass, PnvChip, Pnv8Chip, Pnv9Chip, and Pnv10Chip to new
pnv_chip.h, and adjust include directives. This breaks the inclusion
loop mentioned above.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20221222104628.659681-2-armbru@redhat.com>
Snapshot loading only expects to call deterministic handlers, not
non-deterministic ones. So introduce a way of registering handlers that
won't be called when reseting for snapshots.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Message-id: 20221025004327.568476-2-Jason@zx2c4.com
[PMM: updated json doc comment with Markus' text; fixed
checkpatch style nit]
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
This will enable support for the 'dumpdtb' QMP/HMP command for
all powernv machines.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220926173855.1159396-13-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Use autofree heap allocation instead of variable-length
array on the stack.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-id: 20220819153931.3147384-7-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Given that powernv9 and powernv10 uses the same pnv-phb backend, the
logic to allow user created pnv-phbs for powernv10 is already in place.
Let's flip the switch.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220811163950.578927-11-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The function assumes that we're always dealing with a PNV9_CHIP()
object. This is not the case when the pnv-phb device belongs to a
powernv10 machine.
Change pnv_phb4_get_pec() to be able to work with PNV10_CHIP() if
necessary.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220811163950.578927-10-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Enable pnv-phb user created devices for powernv9 now that we have
everything in place.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220811163950.578927-9-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The PHB4 backend relies on a link with the corresponding PEC element.
This is trivial to do during machine_init() time for default devices,
but not so much for user created ones.
pnv_phb4_get_pec() is a small variation of the function that was
reverted by commit 9c10d86fee "ppc/pnv: Remove user-created PHB{3,4,5}
devices". We'll use it to determine the appropriate PEC for a given user
created pnv-phb that uses a PHB4 backend.
This is done during realize() time, in pnv_phb_user_device_init().
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220811163950.578927-8-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The bulk of the work was already done by previous patches.
Use defaults_enabled() to determine whether we need to create the
default devices or not.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220811163950.578927-7-danielhb413@gmail.com>
When enabling user created PHBs (a change reverted by commit 9c10d86fee)
we were handling PHBs created by default versus by the user in different
manners. The only difference between these PHBs is that one will have a
valid phb3->chip that is assigned during pnv_chip_power8_realize(),
while the user created needs to search which chip it belongs to.
Aside from that there shouldn't be any difference. Making the default
PHBs behave in line with the user created ones will make it easier to
re-introduce them later on. It will also make the code easier to follow
since we are dealing with them in equal manner.
The first step is to turn chip8->phbs[] into a PnvPHB3 pointer array.
This will allow us to assign user created PHBs into it later on. The way
we initilize the default case is now more in line with that would happen
with the user created case: the object is created, parented by the chip
because pnv_xscom_dt() relies on it, and then assigned to the array.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220811163950.578927-6-danielhb413@gmail.com>
pnv_parent_qom_fixup() and pnv_parent_bus_fixup() are versions of the
helpers that were reverted by commit 9c10d86fee "ppc/pnv: Remove
user-created PHB{3,4,5} devices". They are needed to amend the QOM and
bus hierarchies of user created pnv-phbs, matching them with default
pnv-phbs.
A new helper pnv_phb_user_device_init() is created to handle
user-created devices setup. We're going to call it inside
pnv_phb_realize() in case we're realizing an user created device. This
will centralize all user device realated in a single spot, leaving the
realize functions of the phb3/phb4 backends untouched.
Another helper called pnv_chip_add_phb() was added to handle the
particularities of each chip version when adding a new PHB.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220811163950.578927-5-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The helper is only used in this file.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-13-danielhb413@gmail.com>
We support only a single root port, PNV_PHB_ROOT_PORT.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-10-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The unified pnv-phb-root-port can be used instead. The phb4-root-port
device isn't exposed to the user in any official QEMU release so there's
no ABI breakage in removing it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-9-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The unified pnv-phb-root-port can be used in its place. There is no ABI
breakage in doing so because no official QEMU release introduced user
creatable pnv-phb3-root-port devices.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-8-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Change the parent type of the PnvPHB4 device to TYPE_PARENT since the
PCI bus is going to be initialized by the PnvPHB parent. Functions that
needs to access the bus via a PnvPHB4 object can do so via the
phb4->phb_base pointer.
pnv_phb4_pec now creates a PnvPHB object.
The powernv9 machine class will create PnvPHB devices with version '4'.
powernv10 will create using version '5'. Both are using global machine
properties in their class_init() to do that.
These changes will benefit us when adding PnvPHB user creatable devices
for powernv9 and powernv10.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-6-danielhb413@gmail.com>
We need a handful of changes that needs to be done in a single swoop to
turn PnvPHB3 into a PnvPHB backend.
In the PnvPHB3, since the PnvPHB device implements PCIExpressHost and
will hold the PCI bus, change PnvPHB3 parent to TYPE_DEVICE. There are a
couple of instances in pnv_phb3.c that needs to access the PCI bus, so a
phb_base pointer is added to allow access to the parent PnvPHB. The
PnvPHB3 root port will now be connected to a PnvPHB object.
In pnv.c, the powernv8 machine chip8 will now hold an array of PnvPHB
objects. pnv_get_phb3_child() needs to be adapted to return the PnvPHB3
backend from the PnvPHB child. A global property is added in
pnv_machine_power8_class_init() to ensure that all PnvPHBs are created
with phb->version = 3.
After all these changes we're still able to boot a powernv8 machine with
default settings. The real gain will come with user created PnvPHB
devices, coming up next.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-4-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The SBE (Self Boot Engine) are on-chip microcontrollers that perform
early boot steps, as well as provide some runtime facilities (e.g.,
timer, secure register access, MPIPL). The latter facilities are
accessed mostly via a message system called SBEFIFO.
This driver provides initial emulation for the SBE runtime registers
and a very basic SBEFIFO implementation that provides the timer
command. This covers the basic SBE behaviour expected by skiboot when
booting.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220811093726.1442343-1-npiggin@gmail.com>
[danielhb: fixed SBE_HOST_RESPONSE_MASK long line]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
ppc_cpu_compare_class_pvr_mask() should match the best CPU class in the
family, because it is used by the KVM subsystem to find the host CPU
class. Since commit 03ae4133ab ("target-ppc: Add pvr_match()
callback"), it matches any class in the family (the first one in the
comparison list).
Since commit f30c843ced ("ppc/pnv: Introduce PowerNV machines with
fixed CPU models"), pnv has relied on pnv_match having these new
semantics to check machine compatibility with a CPU family.
Resolve this by adding a parameter to the pvr_match function to select
the best or any match, and restore the old behaviour for the KVM case.
Prior to this fix, e.g., a POWER9 DD2.3 KVM host matches to the
power9_v1.0 class (because that happens to be the first POWER9 family
CPU compared). After the patch, it matches the power9_v2.0 class.
This approach requires pnv_match contain knowledge of the CPU classes
implemented in the same family, which feels ugly. But pushing the 'best'
match down to the class would still require they know about one another
which is not obviously much better. For now this gets things working.
Fixes: 03ae4133ab ("target-ppc: Add pvr_match() callback")
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220731013358.170187-1-npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
It's inneficient to scroll all child objects when we have all PHBs
available in chip8->phbs[].
pnv_chip_power8_pic_print_info_child() ended up folded into
pic_print_info() for simplicity.
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220621173436.165912-7-danielhb413@gmail.com>
pnv_ics_resend() is scrolling through all the child objects of the chip
to search for the PHBs. It's faster and simpler to just use the phbs[]
array.
pnv_ics_resend_child() was folded into pnv_ics_resend() since it's too
simple to justify its own function.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220621173436.165912-6-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The function is working today by getting all the child objects of the
chip, interacting with each of them to check whether the child is a PHB,
and then doing what needs to be done.
We have all the chip PHBs in the phbs[] array so interacting with all
child objects is unneeded. Open code pnv_ics_get_phb_ics() into
pnv_ics_get() and remove both pnv_ics_get_phb_ics() and the
ForeachPhb3Args struct.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220621173436.165912-5-danielhb413@gmail.com>
It is not advisable to execute an object_dynamic_cast() to poke into
bus->qbus.parent and follow it up with a C cast into the PnvPHB type we
think we got.
In fact this is not needed. There is nothing sophisticated being done
with the PHB object retrieved during root_port_realize() for both PHB3
and PHB4. We're retrieving a PHB reference just to access phb->chip_id
and phb->phb_id and use them to define the chassis/slot of the root
port.
phb->phb_id is already being passed to pnv_phb_attach_root_port() via
the 'index' parameter. Let's also add a 'chip_id' parameter to this
function and assign chassis and slot right there. This will spare us
from the hassle of accessing the PHB object inside realize().
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220621173436.165912-4-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Use an anonymous output GPIO line to connect the OCC device with the
PSIHB device and raise the appropriate PSI IRQ line depending on the
processor model.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220323072846.1780212-4-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Create an anonymous output GPIO line to connect the LPC device with
the PSIHB device and raise the appropriate PSI IRQ line depending on
the processor model.
A temporary __pnv_psi_irq_set() routine is introduced to handle the
transition. It will be removed when all devices raising PSI interrupts
are converted to use GPIOs.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220323072846.1780212-3-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
On a real system with POWER{8,9,10} processors, PHBs are sub-units of
the processor, they can be deactivated by firmware but not plugged in
or out like a PCI adapter on a slot. Nevertheless, having user-created
PHBs in QEMU seemed to be a good idea for testing purposes :
1. having a limited set of PHBs speedups boot time.
2. it is useful to be able to mimic a partially broken topology you
some time have to deal with during bring-up.
PowerNV is also used for distro install tests and having libvirt
support eases these tasks. libvirt prefers to run the machine with
-nodefaults to be sure not to drag unexpected devices which would need
to be defined in the domain file without being specified on the QEMU
command line. For this reason :
3. -nodefaults should not include default PHBs
User-created PHB{3,4,5} devices satisfied all these needs but reality
proves to be a bit more complex, internally when modeling such
devices, and externally when dealing with the user interface.
Req 1. and 2. can be simply addressed differently with a machine option:
"phb-mask=<uint>", which QEMU would use to enable/disable PHB device
nodes when creating the device tree.
For Req 3., we need to make sure we are taking the right approach. It
seems that we should expose a new type of user-created PHB device, a
generic virtualized one, that libvirt would use and not one depending
on the processor revision. This needs more thinking.
For now, remove user-created PHB{3,4,5} devices. All the cleanups we
did are not lost and they will be useful for the next steps.
Fixes: 5bc67b052b ("ppc/pnv: Introduce user creatable pnv-phb4 devices")
Fixes: 1f6a88fffc ("ppc/pnv: Introduce support for user created PHB3 devices")
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220314130514.529931-1-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Always create the PECs (PCI Express Controller) for the system. The
PECs host the PHBs and we try to find the matching PEC when creating a
PHB, so it must exist. It also matches what we do on POWER9
Fixes: 623575e16c ("ppc/pnv: Add model for POWER10 PHB5 PCIe Host bridge")
Signed-off-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
[ clg: - Rewored commit log
- Removed dynamic PHB5 ]
Message-Id: <20220310155101.294568-3-fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
POWER10 adds support for StoreEOI operation and 64K ESB pages on PSIHB
to be consistent with the other interrupt sources of the system.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
and use a pnv_chip_power10_quad_realize() helper to avoid code
duplication with P9. This still needs some refinements on the XSCOM
registers handling in PnvQuad.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Our OCC model is very mininal and POWER10 can simply reuse the OCC
model we introduced for POWER9.
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
