mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux
synced 2024-09-19 10:39:01 +00:00
selftests/mm: skip soft-dirty tests on arm64
arm64 does not support the soft-dirty PTE bit. However, the `soft-dirty` test suite is currently run unconditionally and therefore generates spurious test failures on arm64. There are also some tests in `madv_populate` which assume it is supported. For `soft-dirty` lets disable the whole suite for arm64; it is no longer built and run_vmtests.sh will skip it if its not present. For `madv_populate`, we need a runtime mechanism so that the remaining tests continue to be run. Unfortunately, the only way to determine if the soft-dirty dirty bit is supported is to write to a page, then see if the bit is set in /proc/self/pagemap. But the tests that we want to conditionally execute are testing precicesly this. So if we introduced this feature check, we could accedentally turn a real failure (on a system that claims to support soft-dirty) into a skip. So instead, do the check based on architecture; for arm64, we report that soft-dirty is not supported. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230724082522.1202616-3-ryan.roberts@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org> Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
58e2847ad2
commit
f6dd4e223d
|
@ -64,12 +64,15 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS += thuge-gen
|
|||
TEST_GEN_PROGS += transhuge-stress
|
||||
TEST_GEN_PROGS += uffd-stress
|
||||
TEST_GEN_PROGS += uffd-unit-tests
|
||||
TEST_GEN_PROGS += soft-dirty
|
||||
TEST_GEN_PROGS += split_huge_page_test
|
||||
TEST_GEN_PROGS += ksm_tests
|
||||
TEST_GEN_PROGS += ksm_functional_tests
|
||||
TEST_GEN_PROGS += mdwe_test
|
||||
|
||||
ifneq ($(ARCH),arm64)
|
||||
TEST_GEN_PROGS += soft-dirty
|
||||
endif
|
||||
|
||||
ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64)
|
||||
CAN_BUILD_I386 := $(shell ./../x86/check_cc.sh "$(CC)" ../x86/trivial_32bit_program.c -m32)
|
||||
CAN_BUILD_X86_64 := $(shell ./../x86/check_cc.sh "$(CC)" ../x86/trivial_64bit_program.c)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -264,14 +264,35 @@ static void test_softdirty(void)
|
|||
munmap(addr, SIZE);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int system_has_softdirty(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* There is no way to check if the kernel supports soft-dirty, other
|
||||
* than by writing to a page and seeing if the bit was set. But the
|
||||
* tests are intended to check that the bit gets set when it should, so
|
||||
* doing that check would turn a potentially legitimate fail into a
|
||||
* skip. Fortunately, we know for sure that arm64 does not support
|
||||
* soft-dirty. So for now, let's just use the arch as a corse guide.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#if defined(__aarch64__)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
#else
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int main(int argc, char **argv)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int nr_tests = 16;
|
||||
int err;
|
||||
|
||||
pagesize = getpagesize();
|
||||
|
||||
if (system_has_softdirty())
|
||||
nr_tests += 5;
|
||||
|
||||
ksft_print_header();
|
||||
ksft_set_plan(21);
|
||||
ksft_set_plan(nr_tests);
|
||||
|
||||
sense_support();
|
||||
test_prot_read();
|
||||
|
@ -279,7 +300,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
|
|||
test_holes();
|
||||
test_populate_read();
|
||||
test_populate_write();
|
||||
test_softdirty();
|
||||
if (system_has_softdirty())
|
||||
test_softdirty();
|
||||
|
||||
err = ksft_get_fail_cnt();
|
||||
if (err)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -322,7 +322,10 @@ then
|
|||
CATEGORY="pkey" run_test ./protection_keys_64
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
CATEGORY="soft_dirty" run_test ./soft-dirty
|
||||
if [ -x ./soft-dirty ]
|
||||
then
|
||||
CATEGORY="soft_dirty" run_test ./soft-dirty
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
# COW tests
|
||||
CATEGORY="cow" run_test ./cow
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue