root is allowed to create raw sockets, then they will be able to create
routing sockets, too. However prison-root is not able to manipulate
routing tables. So when route(8) attempts to write to a routing
socket and recieves EPERM from the kernel, exit rather than moving
on with execution.
Approved by: bmilekic (mentor)
prior sysctl due to the structure growing between calls try again.
Also try again for deleting routes if things fail. We've seen
route -f fail this way which does not actually flush all routes.
This fixes it. It will whine but it will do the work.
PR: 56732
Obtained from: IronPort
answer for the euid. As a result, fix it such that setuid scripts or
programs may call route(8) to do work on their behalf.
Reviewed by: ru
MFC after: 3 days
- /0 if matches ::/128
- /64 if matches 2000::/3 and lowermost 64 bit is all 0
- /128 if matches 2000::/3 and lowermost 64 bit is non-zero 0
Obtained from: KAME/NetBSD
It does not help modern compilers, and some may take some hit from it.
(I also found several functions that listed *every* of its 10 local vars with
"register" -- just how many free registers do people think machines have?)
socket so that routing daemons and other interested parties
know when an interface is attached/detached.
PR: kern/33747
Obtained from: NetBSD
MFC after: 2 weeks
Allow non-superuser to open, listen to, and send safe commands on the
routing socket. Superuser priviledge is required for all commands
but RTM_GET.
Lose `setuid root' bit of route(8).
Reviewed by: wollman, dd
Avoid using parenthesis enclosure macros (.Pq and .Po/.Pc) with plain text.
Not only this slows down the mdoc(7) processing significantly, but it also
has an undesired (in this case) effect of disabling hyphenation within the
entire enclosed block.
to use 0xffffffff (INADDR_NONE) as a netmask value. The fix
is to use inet_addr(3) which doesn't suffer from this problem.
PR: bin/28873
Also, while here, fixed the bug when netmask value was ignored
(RTF_HOST flag was set) if the "destination gateway netmask"
syntax is used, e.g. ``route add 1.2.3.4 127.1 255.255.255.255''.
in revision 1.48. It is pretty valid and often feasible to use
a non-point-to-point interface as the gateway. One might, for
example, use this to route some hosts through an ARP on a local
interface, without having to assign an additional IP address:
Script started on Tue Jun 12 16:16:09 2001
# ifconfig rl0 inet
rl0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.4.115 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.4.255
# netstat -arn -finet | grep -w rl0
192.168.4 link#1 UC 3 0 rl0 =>
192.168.4.65 0:d0:b7:16:9c:c6 UHLW 1 0 rl0 1197
# route add -net 192.168.100 -iface rl0
add net 192.168.100: gateway rl0
# ping 192.168.100.1
PING 192.168.100.1 (192.168.100.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.100.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0.551 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.268 ms
^C
--- 192.168.100.1 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.268/0.410/0.551/0.142 ms
# netstat -arn -finet | grep -w rl0
192.168.4 link#1 UC 3 0 rl0 =>
192.168.4.65 0:d0:b7:16:9c:c6 UHLW 1 0 rl0 1165
192.168.100 link#1 UCSc 1 0 rl0 =>
192.168.100.1 0:d0:b7:16:9c:c6 UHLW 1 4 rl0 1192
Script done on Tue Jun 12 16:17:12 2001
This work was based on kame-20010528-freebsd43-snap.tgz and some
critical problem after the snap was out were fixed.
There are many many changes since last KAME merge.
TODO:
- The definitions of SADB_* in sys/net/pfkeyv2.h are still different
from RFC2407/IANA assignment because of binary compatibility
issue. It should be fixed under 5-CURRENT.
- ip6po_m member of struct ip6_pktopts is no longer used. But, it
is still there because of binary compatibility issue. It should
be removed under 5-CURRENT.
Reviewed by: itojun
Obtained from: KAME
MFC after: 3 weeks
a route to the gateway and caches it in the route structure.
It may happen (if the routing table is screwed) that the gateway
route is the same route as the one being modified, in which case
a kernel reports EDQUOT. Be more verbose about this:
# route add -net 10 192.168.4.65
add net 10: gateway 192.168.4.65
# netstat -rn -finet
Routing tables
Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire
default 192.168.4.65 UGSc 1 7 rl0
10 192.168.4.65 UGSc 0 0 rl0
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 178 lo0
192.168.4 link#1 UC 2 0 rl0 =>
192.168.4.65 0:d0:b7:16:9c:c6 UHLW 2 0 rl0 1123
Before:
# route change -net 10 10.0.0.1
route: writing to routing socket: Disc quota exceeded
change net 10: gateway 10.0.0.1: Disc quota exceeded
After:
# ./route change -net 10 10.0.0.1
route: writing to routing socket: Disc quota exceeded
change net 10: gateway 10.0.0.1: gateway uses the same route
PR: bin/1093, misc/26833
PR: bin/12489
- Use inet_ntoa(3) where it should have been used. This
part of code simply wasn't converted to the "new" style
after the routename() function was converted from the
protocol-generic version to protocol-specific version
in CSRG revision 5.6.
MFC after: 1 week
to be the same as -ragged in the current implementation) to
-ragged. With mdocNG, -filled displays produce the correct
output, formatted and justified to both margins.
argument only. Before that, the `route add default gateway' first tried
the `gateway' as network address and passed its name to getnetbyname(3),
which in the BIND resolution case does the T_PTR lookup on that name.
don't support routes with sin6_scope_id set.
Without this fix, routes with IPv6 scoped addr won't work when it is
assigned by "route" command.
Approved by: jkh
Reviewed by: ume
IPv6 scoped addr display is not yet supported by ifconfig
and route. Now almost of IPv6 apps support it, so its support
in ifconfig and route is important to keep consisetncy, and
to avoid user confusion.
Approved by: jkh
packet divert at kernel for IPv6/IPv4 translater daemon
This includes queue related patch submitted by jburkhol@home.com.
Submitted by: queue related patch from jburkhol@home.com
Reviewed by: freebsd-arch, cvs-committers
Obtained from: KAME project
sizeof(ifr->ifr_addr) for the variable length field ifr->ifr_addr.sa_len.
Otherwise the increment will be wrong in certain cases.
Obtained from: Whistle source tree
For the record: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> suggests
SIOCGIFCONF should be dropped in favor of a sysctl mechanism.
to do with netmasks.. we fed totally bogus data into the kernel
to do with default routes and it just believed us. this led to:
1/ kernel panics
2/ the default route refusing to be deleted or added
(depending on a number of factors, usually it worked ok.)
buffer (so more difficult to exploit but better safe than sorry). Found
by comparing FreeBSD & OpenBSD sources/logs for the auditing process.
Reviewed by: Warner Losh
Obtained from: OpenBSD
This will make a number of things easier in the future, as well as (finally!)
avoiding the Id-smashing problem which has plagued developers for so long.
Boy, I'm glad we're not using sup anymore. This update would have been
insane otherwise.
do it themselves. (Some of these programs actually depended on this
beyond compiling the definition of struct ifinfo!) Also fix up some
other #include messes while we're at it.
Opening the socket is the only privileged operation route requires.
Make a couple of static buffers bigger, and use strncpy() and snprintf() where
there's a chance of overflow.
Fixes PR bin/1903
Partially Submitted by: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>
Don't look up the network number if we're being asked to add a host route.
Fixes PR bin/1900
Submitted by: Bruce A. Mah <bmah@cs.berkeley.edu> (pr bin/1900)
for gcc >= 2.5 and no-ops for gcc >= 2.6. Converted to use __dead2
or __pure2 where it wasn't already done, except in math.h where use
of __pure was mostly wrong.
Submitted by: archie@whistle.com
This patch allows true interface routing to be controlled
from the command line..
you can now do:
route add default -interface ppp0
even if you have no clue what the address at the other end is..
this is part of a set of changes that allow true "unnumbered links"
such as netcom run between their sites..
In practice you should assign the address from one of your ethernet
interfaces to the local side of the P2P link so that IP doesn't
say that the packet comes from 255.255.255.255, but
there is no need whatsoever to assign an address of any kind
to the remote end of the link.. useful for frame relay links etc also.
