unless it's in the closed or listening state (remote address
== INADDR_ANY).
If a TCP inpcb is in any other state, it's impossible to steal
its local port or use it for port theft. And if there are
both closed/listening and connected TCP inpcbs on the same
localIP:port couple, the call to in_pcblookup_local() will
find the former due to the design of that function.
No objections raised in: -net, -arch
MFC after: 1 month
1) Missing include for declaration of time conversion functions.
2) Avoid a couple of alignment warnings on 64 bit arches by memcpying the
things pointed to by caddrs into variables of the right type.
Bump WARNS to 6 while I'm here.
man page after Orla, so the mistakes are probably mine. Leave a
note on the door welcoming the mdoc police.
Submitted by: Orla McGann <orly@cnri.dit.ie>
character, as some tar implementations incorrectly include a '/' with
the prefix.
Thanks to: Divacky Roman for the UnixWare 7 tarfile that
demonstrated this issue.
to <sys/gmon.h>. Cleaned them up a little by not attempting to ifdef
for incomplete and out of date support for GUPROF in userland, as in
the sparc64 version.
of kmupetext(). The declaration is misplaced in <machine/profile.h>
since it is not MD and not related to the lowest level of profiling.
It will be moved, but getting it via <sys/gmon.h> already works.
code available at tuhs.org, and found out that my chronology
is a bit off. In particular, Seventh Edition already used
the "linkflag" and "linkname" fields. Also, it appears that
there was no tar in Sixth Edition, contrary to what an earlier
tar.1 manpage claimed.
A few mdoc fixes also crept in here.
the size field for a hardlink entry. Specifically, ensure that
we do obey the size field for archives that we know are pax interchange
format archives, as required by POSIX.
Also, clarify the comment explaining why this is necessary and explain
the (very unusual) conditions under which it might fail.
algorithm, supplied by wpaul himself. The lame one has an origin
that's been called into question, so rather than argue about that (one
could make an excellent fair use argument), replace it with better
code since that's what FreeBSD is about.
Submitted by: wpaul[1], Klaus Klein
[1] Bill called this a silly bikeshed. Maybe his is not incorrect.
