dart-sdk/runtime/vm/instructions_x64.cc

111 lines
3.6 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright (c) 2012, the Dart project authors. Please see the AUTHORS file
// for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a
// BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
#include "vm/globals.h" // Needed here to get TARGET_ARCH_X64.
#if defined(TARGET_ARCH_X64)
#include "platform/unaligned.h"
Reland "[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 1-4" Relands 165c583d57af613836cf7d08242ce969521db00b [VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 1 This CL: * Adds a field to [RawAbstractType] which will always hold a pointer to the entrypoint of a type testing stub * Makes this new field be initialized to a default stub whenever a instances are created (e.g. via Type::New(), snapshot reader, ...) * Makes the clustered snapshotter write a reference to the corresponding [RawInstructions] object when writing the field and do the reverse when reading it. * Makes us call the type testing stub for performing assert-assignable checks. To reduce unnecessary loads on callsites, we store the entrypoint of the type testing stubs directly in the type objects. This means that the caller of type testing stubs can simply branch there without populating a code object first. This also means that the type testing stubs themselves have no access to a pool and we therefore also don't hold on to the [Code] object, only the [Instruction] object is necessary. The type testing stubs do not setup a frame themselves and also have no safepoint. In the case when the type testing stubs could not determine a positive answer they will tail-call a general-purpose stub. The general-purpose stub sets up a stub frame, tries to consult a [SubtypeTestCache] and bails out to runtime if this was unsuccessful. This CL is just the the first, for ease of reviewing. The actual type-specialized type testing stubs will be generated in later CLs. Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/44787 Relands f226c22424c483d65499545e560efc059f9dde1c [VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 2 This CL starts building type testing stubs specialzed for [Type] objects we test against. More specifically, it adds support for: * Handling obvious fast cases on the call sites (while still having a call to stub for negative case) * Handling type tests against type parameters, by loading the value of the type parameter on the call sites and invoking it's type testing stub. * Specialzed type testing stubs for instantiated types where we can do [CidRange]-based subtype-checks. ==> e.g. String/List<dynamic> * Specialzed type testing stubs for instantiated types where we can do [CidRange]-based subclass-checks for the class and [CidRange]-based subtype-checks for the type arguments. ==> e.g. Widget<State>, where we know [Widget] is only extended and not implemented. * Specialzed type testing stubs for certain non-instantiated types where we can do [CidRange]-based subclass-checks for the class and [CidRange]-based subtype-checks for the instantiated type arguments and cid based comparisons for type parameters. (Note that this fast-case migth result in some false-negatives!) ==> e.g. _HashMapEntry<K, V>, where we know [_HashMapEntry] is only extended and not implemented. This optimizes cases where the caller uses `new HashMap<A, B>()` and only uses `A` and `B` as key/values (and not subclasses of it). The false-negative can occur when subtypes of A or B are used. In such cases we fall back to the [SubtypeTestCache]-based imlementation. Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/44788 Relands 25f98bcc7561006d70a487ba3de55551658ac683 [VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 3 The changes include: * Make AssertAssignableInstr no longer have a call-summary, which helps methods with several parameter checks by not having to re-load/re-initialize type arguments registers * Lazily create SubtypeTestCaches: We already go to runtime to warm up the caches, so we now also create the caches on the first runtime call and patch the pool entries. * No longer load the destination name into a register: We only need the name when we throw an exception, so it is not on the hot path. Instead we let the runtime look at the call site, decoding a pool index from the instructions stream. The destination name will be available in the pool, at a consecutive index to the subtype cache. * Remove the fall-through to N=1 case for probing subtypeing tests, since those will always be handled by the optimized stubs. * Do not generate optimized stubs for FutureOr<T> (so far it just falled-through to TTS). We can make optimzed version of that later, but it requires special subtyping rules. * Local code quality improvement in the type-testing-stubs: Avoid extra jump at last case of cid-class-range checks. There are still a number of optimization opportunities we can do in future changes. Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/46984 Relands 2c52480ec87392992a1388517c46ccc97bdc9b2b [VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 4 In order to avoid generating type testing stubs for too many types in the system - and thereby potentially cause an increase in code size - this change introduces a smarter way to decide for which types we should generate optimized type testing stubs. The precompiler creates a [TypeUsageInfo] which we use to collect information. More specifically: a) We collect the destination types for all type checks we emit (we do this inside AssertAssignableInstr::EmitNativeCode). -> These are types we might want to generate optimized type testing stubs for. b) We collect type argument vectors used in instance creations (we do this inside AllocateObjectInstr::EmitNativeCode) and keep a set of of used type argument vectors for each class. After the precompiler has finished compiling normal code we scan the set of destination types collected in a) for uninstantiated types (or more specifically, type parameter types). We then propagate the type argument vectors used on object allocation sites, which were collected in b), in order to find out what kind of types are flowing into those type parameters. This allows us to extend the set of types which we test against, by adding the types that flow into type parameters. We use this final augmented set of destination types as a "filter" when making the decision whether to generate an optimized type testing stub for a given type. Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/48640 Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/32603 Closes https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/32852 Change-Id: Ib79fbe7f043aa88f32bddad62d7656c638914b44 Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/50944 Commit-Queue: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com> Reviewed-by: Régis Crelier <regis@google.com>
2018-04-13 09:06:56 +00:00
#include "vm/code_patcher.h"
#include "vm/instructions.h"
#include "vm/instructions_x64.h"
#include "vm/constants.h"
#include "vm/cpu.h"
#include "vm/object.h"
#include "vm/object_store.h"
namespace dart {
// [start] is the address of a displacement inside a load instruction
intptr_t IndexFromPPLoadDisp8(uword start) {
int8_t offset = *reinterpret_cast<int8_t*>(start);
return ObjectPool::IndexFromOffset(offset);
}
intptr_t IndexFromPPLoadDisp32(uword start) {
int32_t offset = LoadUnaligned(reinterpret_cast<int32_t*>(start));
return ObjectPool::IndexFromOffset(offset);
}
bool DecodeLoadObjectFromPoolOrThread(uword pc, const Code& code, Object* obj) {
ASSERT(code.ContainsInstructionAt(pc));
uint8_t* bytes = reinterpret_cast<uint8_t*>(pc);
[vm/aot] Fix disassembler bug in bare instructions mode. In bare instructions mode, we do not have a per-Code object pool, but rather a global shared object pool. When generating instructions that access the object pool, we use the index in the (eventually created) global object pool. Recently, when the V8 snapshot profile writer is active, we began attaching an per-Code object pool so that each object in the global object pool can be attributed to the Code objects that caused its inclusion. This pool only has those objects attributable to this Code object, and not all objects in the global pool up to the point of compiling the Code object. However, the disassembler currently only looks at whether the current Code object has an object pool when decoding object pool accesses. This was safe when there were no per-Code object pools in bare instruction mode, but since the change described above, it attempts to access the object in the Code-local pool at the same index as the global pool and crashes. This change fixes the disassembler so that we only try to decode the object being accessed in the object pool when in non-bare instructions mode. Fixes https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/41149 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.dart.try:vm-kernel-precomp-linux-release-x64-try,vm-kernel-precomp-linux-release-simarm_x64-try,vm-kernel-precomp-mac-release-simarm64-try,vm-kernel-precomp-win-release-x64-try Change-Id: I96fd61d05c657a5ee1d86565cc39c83ebee587f1 Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/140603 Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com> Commit-Queue: Teagan Strickland <sstrickl@google.com>
2020-03-23 23:32:35 +00:00
COMPILE_ASSERT(THR == R14);
if ((bytes[0] == 0x49) || (bytes[0] == 0x4d)) {
if ((bytes[1] == 0x8b) || (bytes[1] == 0x3b)) { // movq, cmpq
if ((bytes[2] & 0xc7) == (0x80 | (THR & 7))) { // [r14+disp32]
int32_t offset = LoadUnaligned(reinterpret_cast<int32_t*>(pc + 3));
[vm/aot] Fix disassembler bug in bare instructions mode. In bare instructions mode, we do not have a per-Code object pool, but rather a global shared object pool. When generating instructions that access the object pool, we use the index in the (eventually created) global object pool. Recently, when the V8 snapshot profile writer is active, we began attaching an per-Code object pool so that each object in the global object pool can be attributed to the Code objects that caused its inclusion. This pool only has those objects attributable to this Code object, and not all objects in the global pool up to the point of compiling the Code object. However, the disassembler currently only looks at whether the current Code object has an object pool when decoding object pool accesses. This was safe when there were no per-Code object pools in bare instruction mode, but since the change described above, it attempts to access the object in the Code-local pool at the same index as the global pool and crashes. This change fixes the disassembler so that we only try to decode the object being accessed in the object pool when in non-bare instructions mode. Fixes https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/41149 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.dart.try:vm-kernel-precomp-linux-release-x64-try,vm-kernel-precomp-linux-release-simarm_x64-try,vm-kernel-precomp-mac-release-simarm64-try,vm-kernel-precomp-win-release-x64-try Change-Id: I96fd61d05c657a5ee1d86565cc39c83ebee587f1 Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/140603 Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com> Commit-Queue: Teagan Strickland <sstrickl@google.com>
2020-03-23 23:32:35 +00:00
return Thread::ObjectAtOffset(offset, obj);
}
if ((bytes[2] & 0xc7) == (0x40 | (THR & 7))) { // [r14+disp8]
uint8_t offset = *reinterpret_cast<uint8_t*>(pc + 3);
return Thread::ObjectAtOffset(offset, obj);
}
}
}
if (((bytes[0] == 0x41) && (bytes[1] == 0xff) && (bytes[2] == 0x76))) {
// push [r14+disp8]
uint8_t offset = *reinterpret_cast<uint8_t*>(pc + 3);
return Thread::ObjectAtOffset(offset, obj);
}
COMPILE_ASSERT(PP == R15);
if ((bytes[0] == 0x49) || (bytes[0] == 0x4d)) {
if ((bytes[1] == 0x8b) || (bytes[1] == 0x3b)) { // movq, cmpq
if ((bytes[2] & 0xc7) == (0x80 | (PP & 7))) { // [r15+disp32]
intptr_t index = IndexFromPPLoadDisp32(pc + 3);
return ObjectAtPoolIndex(code, index, obj);
}
if ((bytes[2] & 0xc7) == (0x40 | (PP & 7))) { // [r15+disp8]
intptr_t index = IndexFromPPLoadDisp8(pc + 3);
return ObjectAtPoolIndex(code, index, obj);
}
}
}
return false;
}
Reland "[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 1-4" Relands 165c583d57af613836cf7d08242ce969521db00b [VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 1 This CL: * Adds a field to [RawAbstractType] which will always hold a pointer to the entrypoint of a type testing stub * Makes this new field be initialized to a default stub whenever a instances are created (e.g. via Type::New(), snapshot reader, ...) * Makes the clustered snapshotter write a reference to the corresponding [RawInstructions] object when writing the field and do the reverse when reading it. * Makes us call the type testing stub for performing assert-assignable checks. To reduce unnecessary loads on callsites, we store the entrypoint of the type testing stubs directly in the type objects. This means that the caller of type testing stubs can simply branch there without populating a code object first. This also means that the type testing stubs themselves have no access to a pool and we therefore also don't hold on to the [Code] object, only the [Instruction] object is necessary. The type testing stubs do not setup a frame themselves and also have no safepoint. In the case when the type testing stubs could not determine a positive answer they will tail-call a general-purpose stub. The general-purpose stub sets up a stub frame, tries to consult a [SubtypeTestCache] and bails out to runtime if this was unsuccessful. This CL is just the the first, for ease of reviewing. The actual type-specialized type testing stubs will be generated in later CLs. Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/44787 Relands f226c22424c483d65499545e560efc059f9dde1c [VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 2 This CL starts building type testing stubs specialzed for [Type] objects we test against. More specifically, it adds support for: * Handling obvious fast cases on the call sites (while still having a call to stub for negative case) * Handling type tests against type parameters, by loading the value of the type parameter on the call sites and invoking it's type testing stub. * Specialzed type testing stubs for instantiated types where we can do [CidRange]-based subtype-checks. ==> e.g. String/List<dynamic> * Specialzed type testing stubs for instantiated types where we can do [CidRange]-based subclass-checks for the class and [CidRange]-based subtype-checks for the type arguments. ==> e.g. Widget<State>, where we know [Widget] is only extended and not implemented. * Specialzed type testing stubs for certain non-instantiated types where we can do [CidRange]-based subclass-checks for the class and [CidRange]-based subtype-checks for the instantiated type arguments and cid based comparisons for type parameters. (Note that this fast-case migth result in some false-negatives!) ==> e.g. _HashMapEntry<K, V>, where we know [_HashMapEntry] is only extended and not implemented. This optimizes cases where the caller uses `new HashMap<A, B>()` and only uses `A` and `B` as key/values (and not subclasses of it). The false-negative can occur when subtypes of A or B are used. In such cases we fall back to the [SubtypeTestCache]-based imlementation. Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/44788 Relands 25f98bcc7561006d70a487ba3de55551658ac683 [VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 3 The changes include: * Make AssertAssignableInstr no longer have a call-summary, which helps methods with several parameter checks by not having to re-load/re-initialize type arguments registers * Lazily create SubtypeTestCaches: We already go to runtime to warm up the caches, so we now also create the caches on the first runtime call and patch the pool entries. * No longer load the destination name into a register: We only need the name when we throw an exception, so it is not on the hot path. Instead we let the runtime look at the call site, decoding a pool index from the instructions stream. The destination name will be available in the pool, at a consecutive index to the subtype cache. * Remove the fall-through to N=1 case for probing subtypeing tests, since those will always be handled by the optimized stubs. * Do not generate optimized stubs for FutureOr<T> (so far it just falled-through to TTS). We can make optimzed version of that later, but it requires special subtyping rules. * Local code quality improvement in the type-testing-stubs: Avoid extra jump at last case of cid-class-range checks. There are still a number of optimization opportunities we can do in future changes. Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/46984 Relands 2c52480ec87392992a1388517c46ccc97bdc9b2b [VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 4 In order to avoid generating type testing stubs for too many types in the system - and thereby potentially cause an increase in code size - this change introduces a smarter way to decide for which types we should generate optimized type testing stubs. The precompiler creates a [TypeUsageInfo] which we use to collect information. More specifically: a) We collect the destination types for all type checks we emit (we do this inside AssertAssignableInstr::EmitNativeCode). -> These are types we might want to generate optimized type testing stubs for. b) We collect type argument vectors used in instance creations (we do this inside AllocateObjectInstr::EmitNativeCode) and keep a set of of used type argument vectors for each class. After the precompiler has finished compiling normal code we scan the set of destination types collected in a) for uninstantiated types (or more specifically, type parameter types). We then propagate the type argument vectors used on object allocation sites, which were collected in b), in order to find out what kind of types are flowing into those type parameters. This allows us to extend the set of types which we test against, by adding the types that flow into type parameters. We use this final augmented set of destination types as a "filter" when making the decision whether to generate an optimized type testing stub for a given type. Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/48640 Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/32603 Closes https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/32852 Change-Id: Ib79fbe7f043aa88f32bddad62d7656c638914b44 Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/50944 Commit-Queue: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com> Reviewed-by: Régis Crelier <regis@google.com>
2018-04-13 09:06:56 +00:00
intptr_t TypeTestingStubCallPattern::GetSubtypeTestCachePoolIndex() {
static int16_t indirect_call_pattern[] = {
0xff, -1 /* 0x53 or 0x56 */, 0x07, // callq [RBX/RSI + 0x7]
};
static int16_t direct_call_pattern[] = {
0xe8, -1, -1, -1, -1, // callq [PC + <offset>]
};
static int16_t pattern_disp8[] = {
[vm] Run `clang-format` on code base When uploading CLs, the presubmit checks verify that the lines in the diff are formatted correctly according to `git cl format runtime`. However, when `buildtools/<os>-<arch>/clang/bin/clang-format` is updated, it does not force reformatting of files that would be reformatted. This leads to two issues: * Inconsistent style within the code base and within a single file. * Spurious reformatting in CLs when (1) clang-format is used on the whole file, or (2) the diff lines overlap. `clang-format` doesn't change that frequently, so in general this is not a large issue, but I've seen a bit too many "spurious formatting, please revert" comments on CLs recently. This CL formats the runtime to be in line with the current pinned `clang-format`: ``` $ find runtime/ -iname *.h -o -iname *.cc | xargs buildtools/mac-arm64/clang/bin/clang-format -i ``` `git cl format` (which only formats changed lines, and does so with `clang-format`) seems to not agree with itself, or clang-format, or cpplint in a handful of places. This CL adds `// clang-format off` for these. (See previous patchsets for the specific instances.) TEST=A variety of bots including GCC, MacOS and Windows. Change-Id: I470892e898971899fda14bb3b8f2c8efefd67686 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.dart.try:vm-gcc-linux-try,vm-ffi-qemu-linux-release-riscv64-try,vm-ffi-qemu-linux-release-arm-try,vm-aot-win-debug-x64-try,vm-win-debug-x64c-try,vm-mac-debug-x64-try,vm-mac-debug-arm64-try,vm-aot-linux-debug-x64-try Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/362780 Reviewed-by: Ryan Macnak <rmacnak@google.com> Commit-Queue: Daco Harkes <dacoharkes@google.com>
2024-04-17 19:14:41 +00:00
0x4d, 0x8b, 0x4f, -1, // movq R9, [PP + offset]
Reland "[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 1-4" Relands 165c583d57af613836cf7d08242ce969521db00b [VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 1 This CL: * Adds a field to [RawAbstractType] which will always hold a pointer to the entrypoint of a type testing stub * Makes this new field be initialized to a default stub whenever a instances are created (e.g. via Type::New(), snapshot reader, ...) * Makes the clustered snapshotter write a reference to the corresponding [RawInstructions] object when writing the field and do the reverse when reading it. * Makes us call the type testing stub for performing assert-assignable checks. To reduce unnecessary loads on callsites, we store the entrypoint of the type testing stubs directly in the type objects. This means that the caller of type testing stubs can simply branch there without populating a code object first. This also means that the type testing stubs themselves have no access to a pool and we therefore also don't hold on to the [Code] object, only the [Instruction] object is necessary. The type testing stubs do not setup a frame themselves and also have no safepoint. In the case when the type testing stubs could not determine a positive answer they will tail-call a general-purpose stub. The general-purpose stub sets up a stub frame, tries to consult a [SubtypeTestCache] and bails out to runtime if this was unsuccessful. This CL is just the the first, for ease of reviewing. The actual type-specialized type testing stubs will be generated in later CLs. Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/44787 Relands f226c22424c483d65499545e560efc059f9dde1c [VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 2 This CL starts building type testing stubs specialzed for [Type] objects we test against. More specifically, it adds support for: * Handling obvious fast cases on the call sites (while still having a call to stub for negative case) * Handling type tests against type parameters, by loading the value of the type parameter on the call sites and invoking it's type testing stub. * Specialzed type testing stubs for instantiated types where we can do [CidRange]-based subtype-checks. ==> e.g. String/List<dynamic> * Specialzed type testing stubs for instantiated types where we can do [CidRange]-based subclass-checks for the class and [CidRange]-based subtype-checks for the type arguments. ==> e.g. Widget<State>, where we know [Widget] is only extended and not implemented. * Specialzed type testing stubs for certain non-instantiated types where we can do [CidRange]-based subclass-checks for the class and [CidRange]-based subtype-checks for the instantiated type arguments and cid based comparisons for type parameters. (Note that this fast-case migth result in some false-negatives!) ==> e.g. _HashMapEntry<K, V>, where we know [_HashMapEntry] is only extended and not implemented. This optimizes cases where the caller uses `new HashMap<A, B>()` and only uses `A` and `B` as key/values (and not subclasses of it). The false-negative can occur when subtypes of A or B are used. In such cases we fall back to the [SubtypeTestCache]-based imlementation. Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/44788 Relands 25f98bcc7561006d70a487ba3de55551658ac683 [VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 3 The changes include: * Make AssertAssignableInstr no longer have a call-summary, which helps methods with several parameter checks by not having to re-load/re-initialize type arguments registers * Lazily create SubtypeTestCaches: We already go to runtime to warm up the caches, so we now also create the caches on the first runtime call and patch the pool entries. * No longer load the destination name into a register: We only need the name when we throw an exception, so it is not on the hot path. Instead we let the runtime look at the call site, decoding a pool index from the instructions stream. The destination name will be available in the pool, at a consecutive index to the subtype cache. * Remove the fall-through to N=1 case for probing subtypeing tests, since those will always be handled by the optimized stubs. * Do not generate optimized stubs for FutureOr<T> (so far it just falled-through to TTS). We can make optimzed version of that later, but it requires special subtyping rules. * Local code quality improvement in the type-testing-stubs: Avoid extra jump at last case of cid-class-range checks. There are still a number of optimization opportunities we can do in future changes. Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/46984 Relands 2c52480ec87392992a1388517c46ccc97bdc9b2b [VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 4 In order to avoid generating type testing stubs for too many types in the system - and thereby potentially cause an increase in code size - this change introduces a smarter way to decide for which types we should generate optimized type testing stubs. The precompiler creates a [TypeUsageInfo] which we use to collect information. More specifically: a) We collect the destination types for all type checks we emit (we do this inside AssertAssignableInstr::EmitNativeCode). -> These are types we might want to generate optimized type testing stubs for. b) We collect type argument vectors used in instance creations (we do this inside AllocateObjectInstr::EmitNativeCode) and keep a set of of used type argument vectors for each class. After the precompiler has finished compiling normal code we scan the set of destination types collected in a) for uninstantiated types (or more specifically, type parameter types). We then propagate the type argument vectors used on object allocation sites, which were collected in b), in order to find out what kind of types are flowing into those type parameters. This allows us to extend the set of types which we test against, by adding the types that flow into type parameters. We use this final augmented set of destination types as a "filter" when making the decision whether to generate an optimized type testing stub for a given type. Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/48640 Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/32603 Closes https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/32852 Change-Id: Ib79fbe7f043aa88f32bddad62d7656c638914b44 Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/50944 Commit-Queue: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com> Reviewed-by: Régis Crelier <regis@google.com>
2018-04-13 09:06:56 +00:00
};
static int16_t pattern_disp32[] = {
[vm] Run `clang-format` on code base When uploading CLs, the presubmit checks verify that the lines in the diff are formatted correctly according to `git cl format runtime`. However, when `buildtools/<os>-<arch>/clang/bin/clang-format` is updated, it does not force reformatting of files that would be reformatted. This leads to two issues: * Inconsistent style within the code base and within a single file. * Spurious reformatting in CLs when (1) clang-format is used on the whole file, or (2) the diff lines overlap. `clang-format` doesn't change that frequently, so in general this is not a large issue, but I've seen a bit too many "spurious formatting, please revert" comments on CLs recently. This CL formats the runtime to be in line with the current pinned `clang-format`: ``` $ find runtime/ -iname *.h -o -iname *.cc | xargs buildtools/mac-arm64/clang/bin/clang-format -i ``` `git cl format` (which only formats changed lines, and does so with `clang-format`) seems to not agree with itself, or clang-format, or cpplint in a handful of places. This CL adds `// clang-format off` for these. (See previous patchsets for the specific instances.) TEST=A variety of bots including GCC, MacOS and Windows. Change-Id: I470892e898971899fda14bb3b8f2c8efefd67686 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.dart.try:vm-gcc-linux-try,vm-ffi-qemu-linux-release-riscv64-try,vm-ffi-qemu-linux-release-arm-try,vm-aot-win-debug-x64-try,vm-win-debug-x64c-try,vm-mac-debug-x64-try,vm-mac-debug-arm64-try,vm-aot-linux-debug-x64-try Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/362780 Reviewed-by: Ryan Macnak <rmacnak@google.com> Commit-Queue: Daco Harkes <dacoharkes@google.com>
2024-04-17 19:14:41 +00:00
0x4d, 0x8b, 0x8f, -1, -1, -1, -1, // movq R9, [PP + offset]
};
uword pc = pc_;
if (MatchesPattern(pc, direct_call_pattern,
ARRAY_SIZE(direct_call_pattern))) {
pc -= ARRAY_SIZE(direct_call_pattern);
} else if (MatchesPattern(pc, indirect_call_pattern,
ARRAY_SIZE(indirect_call_pattern))) {
pc -= ARRAY_SIZE(indirect_call_pattern);
} else {
FATAL("Failed to decode at %" Px, pc_);
}
if (MatchesPattern(pc, pattern_disp8, ARRAY_SIZE(pattern_disp8))) {
return IndexFromPPLoadDisp8(pc - 1);
} else if (MatchesPattern(pc, pattern_disp32, ARRAY_SIZE(pattern_disp32))) {
return IndexFromPPLoadDisp32(pc - 4);
} else {
FATAL("Failed to decode at %" Px, pc);
}
Reland "[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 1-4" Relands 165c583d57af613836cf7d08242ce969521db00b [VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 1 This CL: * Adds a field to [RawAbstractType] which will always hold a pointer to the entrypoint of a type testing stub * Makes this new field be initialized to a default stub whenever a instances are created (e.g. via Type::New(), snapshot reader, ...) * Makes the clustered snapshotter write a reference to the corresponding [RawInstructions] object when writing the field and do the reverse when reading it. * Makes us call the type testing stub for performing assert-assignable checks. To reduce unnecessary loads on callsites, we store the entrypoint of the type testing stubs directly in the type objects. This means that the caller of type testing stubs can simply branch there without populating a code object first. This also means that the type testing stubs themselves have no access to a pool and we therefore also don't hold on to the [Code] object, only the [Instruction] object is necessary. The type testing stubs do not setup a frame themselves and also have no safepoint. In the case when the type testing stubs could not determine a positive answer they will tail-call a general-purpose stub. The general-purpose stub sets up a stub frame, tries to consult a [SubtypeTestCache] and bails out to runtime if this was unsuccessful. This CL is just the the first, for ease of reviewing. The actual type-specialized type testing stubs will be generated in later CLs. Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/44787 Relands f226c22424c483d65499545e560efc059f9dde1c [VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 2 This CL starts building type testing stubs specialzed for [Type] objects we test against. More specifically, it adds support for: * Handling obvious fast cases on the call sites (while still having a call to stub for negative case) * Handling type tests against type parameters, by loading the value of the type parameter on the call sites and invoking it's type testing stub. * Specialzed type testing stubs for instantiated types where we can do [CidRange]-based subtype-checks. ==> e.g. String/List<dynamic> * Specialzed type testing stubs for instantiated types where we can do [CidRange]-based subclass-checks for the class and [CidRange]-based subtype-checks for the type arguments. ==> e.g. Widget<State>, where we know [Widget] is only extended and not implemented. * Specialzed type testing stubs for certain non-instantiated types where we can do [CidRange]-based subclass-checks for the class and [CidRange]-based subtype-checks for the instantiated type arguments and cid based comparisons for type parameters. (Note that this fast-case migth result in some false-negatives!) ==> e.g. _HashMapEntry<K, V>, where we know [_HashMapEntry] is only extended and not implemented. This optimizes cases where the caller uses `new HashMap<A, B>()` and only uses `A` and `B` as key/values (and not subclasses of it). The false-negative can occur when subtypes of A or B are used. In such cases we fall back to the [SubtypeTestCache]-based imlementation. Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/44788 Relands 25f98bcc7561006d70a487ba3de55551658ac683 [VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 3 The changes include: * Make AssertAssignableInstr no longer have a call-summary, which helps methods with several parameter checks by not having to re-load/re-initialize type arguments registers * Lazily create SubtypeTestCaches: We already go to runtime to warm up the caches, so we now also create the caches on the first runtime call and patch the pool entries. * No longer load the destination name into a register: We only need the name when we throw an exception, so it is not on the hot path. Instead we let the runtime look at the call site, decoding a pool index from the instructions stream. The destination name will be available in the pool, at a consecutive index to the subtype cache. * Remove the fall-through to N=1 case for probing subtypeing tests, since those will always be handled by the optimized stubs. * Do not generate optimized stubs for FutureOr<T> (so far it just falled-through to TTS). We can make optimzed version of that later, but it requires special subtyping rules. * Local code quality improvement in the type-testing-stubs: Avoid extra jump at last case of cid-class-range checks. There are still a number of optimization opportunities we can do in future changes. Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/46984 Relands 2c52480ec87392992a1388517c46ccc97bdc9b2b [VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 4 In order to avoid generating type testing stubs for too many types in the system - and thereby potentially cause an increase in code size - this change introduces a smarter way to decide for which types we should generate optimized type testing stubs. The precompiler creates a [TypeUsageInfo] which we use to collect information. More specifically: a) We collect the destination types for all type checks we emit (we do this inside AssertAssignableInstr::EmitNativeCode). -> These are types we might want to generate optimized type testing stubs for. b) We collect type argument vectors used in instance creations (we do this inside AllocateObjectInstr::EmitNativeCode) and keep a set of of used type argument vectors for each class. After the precompiler has finished compiling normal code we scan the set of destination types collected in a) for uninstantiated types (or more specifically, type parameter types). We then propagate the type argument vectors used on object allocation sites, which were collected in b), in order to find out what kind of types are flowing into those type parameters. This allows us to extend the set of types which we test against, by adding the types that flow into type parameters. We use this final augmented set of destination types as a "filter" when making the decision whether to generate an optimized type testing stub for a given type. Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/48640 Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/32603 Closes https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/32852 Change-Id: Ib79fbe7f043aa88f32bddad62d7656c638914b44 Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/50944 Commit-Queue: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com> Reviewed-by: Régis Crelier <regis@google.com>
2018-04-13 09:06:56 +00:00
}
} // namespace dart
#endif // defined TARGET_ARCH_X64