There are lots of places in 'commit-graph.h' where a function either has
(or almost has) a full 'struct object_directory *', accesses '->path',
and then throws away the rest of the struct.
This can cause headaches when comparing the locations of object
directories across alternates (e.g., in the case of deciding if two
commit-graph layers can be merged). These paths are normalized with
'normalize_path_copy()' which mitigates some comparison issues, but not
all [1].
Replace usage of 'char *object_dir' with 'odb->path' by storing a
'struct object_directory *' in the 'write_commit_graph_context'
structure. This is an intermediate step towards getting rid of all path
normalization in 'commit-graph.c'.
Resolving a user-provided '--object-dir' argument now requires that we
compare it to the known alternates for equality. Prior to this patch,
an unknown '--object-dir' argument would silently exit with status zero.
This can clearly lead to unintended behavior, such as verifying
commit-graphs that aren't in a repository's own object store (or one of
its alternates), or causing a typo to mask a legitimate commit-graph
verification failure. Make this error non-silent by 'die()'-ing when the
given '--object-dir' does not match any known alternate object store.
[1]: In my testing, for example, I can get one side of the commit-graph
code to fill object_dir with "./objects" and the other with just
"objects".
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The code to write split commit-graph file(s) upon fetching computed
bogus value for the parameter used in splitting the resulting
files, which has been corrected.
* ds/commit-graph-set-size-mult:
commit-graph: prefer default size_mult when given zero
In 50f26bd ("fetch: add fetch.writeCommitGraph config setting",
2019-09-02), the fetch builtin added the capability to write a
commit-graph using the "--split" feature. This feature creates
multiple commit-graph files, and those can merge based on a set
of "split options" including a size multiple. The default size
multiple is 2, which intends to provide a log_2 N depth of the
commit-graph chain where N is the number of commits.
However, I noticed during dogfooding that my commit-graph chains
were becoming quite large when left only to builds by 'git fetch'.
It turns out that in split_graph_merge_strategy(), we default the
size_mult variable to 2 except we override it with the context's
split_opts if they exist. In builtin/fetch.c, we create such a
split_opts, but do not populate it with values.
This problem is due to two failures:
1. It is unclear that we can add the flag COMMIT_GRAPH_WRITE_SPLIT
with a NULL split_opts.
2. If we have a non-NULL split_opts, then we override the default
values even if a zero value is given.
Correct both of these issues. First, do not override size_mult when
the options provide a zero value. Second, stop creating a split_opts
in the fetch builtin.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
One kind of progress messages were always given during commit-graph
generation, instead of following the "if it takes more than two
seconds, show progress" pattern, which has been corrected.
* ds/commit-graph-delay-gen-progress:
commit-graph: use start_delayed_progress()
progress: create GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY
Docfix.
* en/doc-typofix:
Fix spelling errors in no-longer-updated-from-upstream modules
multimail: fix a few simple spelling errors
sha1dc: fix trivial comment spelling error
Fix spelling errors in test commands
Fix spelling errors in messages shown to users
Fix spelling errors in names of tests
Fix spelling errors in comments of testcases
Fix spelling errors in code comments
Fix spelling errors in documentation outside of Documentation/
Documentation: fix a bunch of typos, both old and new
Crufty code and logic accumulated over time around the object
parsing and low-level object access used in "git fsck" have been
cleaned up.
* jk/cleanup-object-parsing-and-fsck: (23 commits)
fsck: accept an oid instead of a "struct tree" for fsck_tree()
fsck: accept an oid instead of a "struct commit" for fsck_commit()
fsck: accept an oid instead of a "struct tag" for fsck_tag()
fsck: rename vague "oid" local variables
fsck: don't require an object struct in verify_headers()
fsck: don't require an object struct for fsck_ident()
fsck: drop blob struct from fsck_finish()
fsck: accept an oid instead of a "struct blob" for fsck_blob()
fsck: don't require an object struct for report()
fsck: only require an oid for skiplist functions
fsck: only provide oid/type in fsck_error callback
fsck: don't require object structs for display functions
fsck: use oids rather than objects for object_name API
fsck_describe_object(): build on our get_object_name() primitive
fsck: unify object-name code
fsck: require an actual buffer for non-blobs
fsck: stop checking tag->tagged
fsck: stop checking commit->parent counts
fsck: stop checking commit->tree value
commit, tag: don't set parsed bit for parse failures
...
When writing a commit-graph, we show progress along several commit
walks. When we use start_delayed_progress(), the progress line will
only appear if that step takes a decent amount of time.
However, one place was missed: computing generation numbers. This is
normally a very fast operation as all commits have been parsed in a
previous step. But, this is showing up for all users no matter how few
commits are being added.
The tests that check for the progress output have already been updated
to use GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY=0 to force the expected output.
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reported-by: ryenus <ryenus@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If we can't parse a commit, then parse_commit() will return an error
code. But it _also_ sets the "parsed" flag, which tells us not to bother
trying to re-parse the object. That means that subsequent parses have no
idea that the information in the struct may be bogus. I.e., doing this:
parse_commit(commit);
...
if (parse_commit(commit) < 0)
die("commit is broken");
will never trigger the die(). The second parse_commit() will see the
"parsed" flag and quietly return success.
There are two obvious ways to fix this:
1. Stop setting "parsed" until we've successfully parsed.
2. Keep a second "corrupt" flag to indicate that we saw an error (and
when the parsed flag is set, return 0/-1 depending on the corrupt
flag).
This patch does option 1. The obvious downside versus option 2 is that
we might continually re-parse a broken object. But in practice,
corruption like this is rare, and we typically die() or return an error
in the caller. So it's OK not to worry about optimizing for corruption.
And it's much simpler: we don't need to use an extra bit in the object
struct, and callers which check the "parsed" flag don't need to learn
about the corrupt bit, too.
There's no new test here, because this case is already covered in t5318.
Note that we do need to update the expected message there, because we
now detect the problem in the return from "parse_commit()", and not with
a separate check for a NULL tree. In fact, we can now ditch that
explicit tree check entirely, as we're covered robustly by this change
(and the previous recent change to treat a NULL tree as a parse error).
We'll also give tags the same treatment. I don't know offhand of any
cases where the problem can be triggered (it implies somebody ignoring a
parse error earlier in the process), but consistently returning an error
should cause the least surprise.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous commit includes a failing test for an issue around
fetch.writeCommitGraph and fetching in a repo with a submodule. Here, we
fix that bug and set the test to "test_expect_success".
The problem arises with this set of commands when the remote repo at
<url> has a submodule. Note that --recurse-submodules is not needed to
demonstrate the bug.
$ git clone <url> test
$ cd test
$ git -c fetch.writeCommitGraph=true fetch origin
Computing commit graph generation numbers: 100% (12/12), done.
BUG: commit-graph.c:886: missing parent <hash1> for commit <hash2>
Aborted (core dumped)
As an initial fix, I converted the code in builtin/fetch.c that calls
write_commit_graph_reachable() to instead launch a "git commit-graph
write --reachable --split" process. That code worked, but is not how we
want the feature to work long-term.
That test did demonstrate that the issue must be something to do with
internal state of the 'git fetch' process.
The write_commit_graph() method in commit-graph.c ensures the commits we
plan to write are "closed under reachability" using close_reachable().
This method walks from the input commits, and uses the UNINTERESTING
flag to mark which commits have already been visited. This allows the
walk to take O(N) time, where N is the number of commits, instead of
O(P) time, where P is the number of paths. (The number of paths can be
exponential in the number of commits.)
However, the UNINTERESTING flag is used in lots of places in the
codebase. This flag usually means some barrier to stop a commit walk,
such as in revision-walking to compare histories. It is not often
cleared after the walk completes because the starting points of those
walks do not have the UNINTERESTING flag, and clear_commit_marks() would
stop immediately.
This is happening during a 'git fetch' call with a remote. The fetch
negotiation is comparing the remote refs with the local refs and marking
some commits as UNINTERESTING.
I tested running clear_commit_marks_many() to clear the UNINTERESTING
flag inside close_reachable(), but the tips did not have the flag, so
that did nothing.
It turns out that the calculate_changed_submodule_paths() method is at
fault. Thanks, Peff, for pointing out this detail! More specifically,
for each submodule, the collect_changed_submodules() runs a revision
walk to essentially do file-history on the list of submodules. That
revision walk marks commits UNININTERESTING if they are simplified away
by not changing the submodule.
Instead, I finally arrived on the conclusion that I should use a flag
that is not used in any other part of the code. In commit-reach.c, a
number of flags were defined for commit walk algorithms. The REACHABLE
flag seemed like it made the most sense, and it seems it was not
actually used in the file. The REACHABLE flag was used in early versions
of commit-reach.c, but was removed by 4fbcca4 (commit-reach: make
can_all_from_reach... linear, 2018-07-20).
Add the REACHABLE flag to commit-graph.c and use it instead of
UNINTERESTING in close_reachable(). This fixes the bug in manual
testing.
Reported-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Helped-by: Szeder Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Miscellaneous code clean-ups.
* ah/cleanups:
git_mkstemps_mode(): replace magic numbers with computed value
wrapper: use a loop instead of repetitive statements
diffcore-break: use a goto instead of a redundant if statement
commit-graph: remove a duplicate assignment
The code to parse and use the commit-graph file has been made more
robust against corrupted input.
* tb/commit-graph-harden:
commit-graph.c: handle corrupt/missing trees
commit-graph.c: handle commit parsing errors
t/t5318: introduce failing 'git commit-graph write' tests
The "upload-pack" (the counterpart of "git fetch") needs to disable
commit-graph when responding to a shallow clone/fetch request, but
the way this was done made Git panic, which has been corrected.
* jk/disable-commit-graph-during-upload-pack:
upload-pack: disable commit graph more gently for shallow traversal
commit-graph: bump DIE_ON_LOAD check to actual load-time
A pair of small fixups to "git commit-graph" have been applied.
* jk/commit-graph-cleanup:
commit-graph: turn off save_commit_buffer
commit-graph: don't show progress percentages while expanding reachable commits
Leave the variable 'g' uninitialized before it is set just before its
first use in front of a loop, which is a much more appropriate place to
indicate what it is used for.
Also initialize the variable 'num_commits' just before the loop instead
of at the beginning of the function for the same reason.
Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add --[no-]progress to git commit-graph write and verify.
The progress feature was introduced in 7b0f229
("commit-graph write: add progress output", 2018-09-17) but
the ability to opt-out was overlooked.
Signed-off-by: Garima Singh <garima.singh@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Let commit_list_count() count the number of parents instead of
duplicating it. Also store the result in an unsigned int, as that's
what the function returns, and the count is never negative.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the client has asked for certain shallow options like
"deepen-since", we do a custom rev-list walk that pretends to be
shallow. Before doing so, we have to disable the commit-graph, since it
is not compatible with the shallow view of the repository. That's
handled by 829a321569 (commit-graph: close_commit_graph before shallow
walk, 2018-08-20). That commit literally closes and frees our
repo->objects->commit_graph struct.
That creates an interesting problem for commits that have _already_ been
parsed using the commit graph. Their commit->object.parsed flag is set,
their commit->graph_pos is set, but their commit->maybe_tree may still
be NULL. When somebody later calls repo_get_commit_tree(), we see that
we haven't loaded the tree oid yet and try to get it from the commit
graph. But since it has been freed, we segfault!
So the root of the issue is a data dependency between the commit's
lazy-load of the tree oid and the fact that the commit graph can go
away mid-process. How can we resolve it?
There are a couple of general approaches:
1. The obvious answer is to avoid loading the tree from the graph when
we see that it's NULL. But then what do we return for the tree oid?
If we return NULL, our caller in do_traverse() will rightly
complain that we have no tree. We'd have to fallback to loading the
actual commit object and re-parsing it. That requires teaching
parse_commit_buffer() to understand re-parsing (i.e., not starting
from a clean slate and not leaking any allocated bits like parent
list pointers).
2. When we close the commit graph, walk through the set of in-memory
objects and clear any graph_pos pointers. But this means we also
have to "unparse" any such commits so that we know they still need
to open the commit object to fill in their trees. So it's no less
complicated than (1), and is more expensive (since we clear objects
we might not later need).
3. Stop freeing the commit-graph struct. Continue to let it be used
for lazy-loads of tree oids, but let upload-pack specify that it
shouldn't be used for further commit parsing.
4. Push the whole shallow rev-list out to its own sub-process, with
the commit-graph disabled from the start, giving it a clean memory
space to work from.
I've chosen (3) here. Options (1) and (2) would work, but are
non-trivial to implement. Option (4) is more expensive, and I'm not sure
how complicated it is (shelling out for the actual rev-list part is
easy, but we do then parse the resulting commits internally, and I'm not
clear which parts need to be handling shallow-ness).
The new test in t5500 triggers this segfault, but see the comments there
for how horribly intimate it has to be with how both upload-pack and
commit graphs work.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 43d3561805 (commit-graph write: don't die if the existing graph
is corrupt, 2019-03-25) added an environment variable we use only in the
test suite, $GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_DIE_ON_LOAD. But it put the check for
this variable at the very top of prepare_commit_graph(), which is called
every time we want to use the commit graph. Most importantly, it comes
_before_ we check the fast-path "did we already try to load?", meaning
we end up calling getenv() for every single use of the commit graph,
rather than just when we load.
getenv() is allowed to have unexpected side effects, but that shouldn't
be a problem here; we're lazy-loading the graph so it's clear that at
least _one_ invocation of this function is going to call it.
But it is inefficient. getenv() typically has to do a linear search
through the environment space.
We could memoize the call, but it's simpler still to just bump the check
down to the actual loading step. That's fine for our sole user in t5318,
and produces this minor real-world speedup:
[before]
Benchmark #1: git -C linux rev-list HEAD >/dev/null
Time (mean ± σ): 1.460 s ± 0.017 s [User: 1.174 s, System: 0.285 s]
Range (min … max): 1.440 s … 1.491 s 10 runs
[after]
Benchmark #1: git -C linux rev-list HEAD >/dev/null
Time (mean ± σ): 1.391 s ± 0.005 s [User: 1.118 s, System: 0.273 s]
Range (min … max): 1.385 s … 1.399 s 10 runs
Of course that actual speedup depends on how big your environment is. We
can game it like this:
for i in $(seq 10000); do
export dummy$i=$i
done
in which case I get:
[before]
Benchmark #1: git -C linux rev-list HEAD >/dev/null
Time (mean ± σ): 6.257 s ± 0.061 s [User: 6.005 s, System: 0.250 s]
Range (min … max): 6.174 s … 6.337 s 10 runs
[after]
Benchmark #1: git -C linux rev-list HEAD >/dev/null
Time (mean ± σ): 1.403 s ± 0.005 s [User: 1.146 s, System: 0.256 s]
Range (min … max): 1.396 s … 1.412 s 10 runs
So this is really more about avoiding the pathological case than
providing a big real-world speedup.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A mechanism to affect the default setting for a (related) group of
configuration variables is introduced.
* ds/feature-macros:
repo-settings: create feature.experimental setting
repo-settings: create feature.manyFiles setting
repo-settings: parse core.untrackedCache
commit-graph: turn on commit-graph by default
t6501: use 'git gc' in quiet mode
repo-settings: consolidate some config settings
Commit 49bbc57a57 (commit-graph write: emit a percentage for all
progress, 2019-01-19) was a bit overeager when it added progress
percentages to the "Expanding reachable commits in commit graph" phase
as well, because most of the time the number of commits that phase has
to iterate over is not known in advance and grows significantly, and,
consequently, we end up with nonsensical numbers:
$ git commit-graph write --reachable
Expanding reachable commits in commit graph: 138606% (824706/595), done.
[...]
$ git rev-parse v5.0 | git commit-graph write --stdin-commits
Expanding reachable commits in commit graph: 81264400% (812644/1), done.
[...]
Even worse, because the percentage grows so quickly, the progress code
outputs much more often than it should (because it ticks every second,
or every 1%), slowing the whole process down. My time for "git
commit-graph write --reachable" on linux.git went from 13.463s to
12.521s with this patch, ~7% savings.
Therefore, don't show progress percentages in the "Expanding reachable
commits in commit graph" phase.
Note that the current code does sometimes do the right thing, if we
picked up all commits initially (e.g., omitting "--reachable" in a
fully-packed repository would get the correct count without any parent
traversal). So it may be possible to come up with a way to tell when we
could use a percentage here. But in the meantime, let's make sure we
robustly avoid printing nonsense.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Apply similar treatment as in the previous commit to handle an unchecked
call to 'get_commit_tree_oid()'. Previously, a NULL return value from
this function would be immediately dereferenced with '->hash', and then
cause a segfault.
Before dereferencing to access the 'hash' member, check the return value
of 'get_commit_tree_oid()' to make sure that it is not NULL.
To make this check correct, a related change is also needed in
'commit.c', which is to check the return value of 'get_commit_tree'
before taking its address. If 'get_commit_tree' returns NULL, we
encounter an undefined behavior when taking the address of the return
value of 'get_commit_tree' and then taking '->object.oid'. (On my system,
this is memory address 0x8, which is obviously wrong).
Fix this by making sure that 'get_commit_tree' returns something
non-NULL before digging through a structure that is not there, thus
preventing a segfault down the line in the commit graph code.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To write a commit graph chunk, 'write_graph_chunk_data()' takes a list
of commits to write and parses each one before writing the necessary
data, and continuing on to the next commit in the list.
Since the majority of these commits are not parsed ahead of time (an
exception is made for the *last* commit in the list, which is parsed
early within 'copy_oids_to_commits'), it is possible that calling
'parse_commit_no_graph()' on them may return an error. Failing to catch
these errors before de-referencing later calls can result in a undefined
memory access and a SIGSEGV.
One such example of this is 'get_commit_tree_oid()', which expects a
parsed object as its input (in this case, the commit-graph code passes
'*list'). If '*list' causes a parse error, the subsequent call will
fail.
Prevent such an issue by checking the return value of
'parse_commit_no_graph()' to avoid passing an unparsed object to a
function which expects a parsed object, thus preventing a segfault.
It is worth noting that this fix is really skirting around the issue in
object.c's 'parse_object()', which makes it difficult to tell how
corrupt an object is without digging into it. Presumably one could
change the meaning of 'parse_object' returns, but this would require
adjusting each callsite accordingly. Instead of that, add an additional
check to the object parsed.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The code to write commit-graph over given commit object names has
been made a bit more robust.
* sg/commit-graph-validate:
commit-graph: error out on invalid commit oids in 'write --stdin-commits'
commit-graph: turn a group of write-related macro flags into an enum
t5318-commit-graph: use 'test_expect_code'
There are a few important config settings that are not loaded
during git_default_config. These are instead loaded on-demand.
Centralize these config options to a single scan, and store
all of the values in a repo_settings struct. The values for
each setting are initialized as negative to indicate "unset".
This centralization will be particularly important in a later
change to introduce "meta" config settings that change the
defaults for these config settings.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 1771be90 "commit-graph: merge commit-graph chains" (2019-06-18),
the method sort_and_scan_merged_commits() was added to merge the
commit lists of two commit-graph files in the incremental format.
Unfortunately, there was an off-by-one error in that method around
incrementing num_extra_edges, which leads to an incorrect offset
for the base graph chunk.
When we store an octopus merge in the commit-graph file, we store
the first parent in the normal place, but use the second parent
position to point into the "extra edges" chunk where the remaining
parents exist. This means we should be adding "num_parents - 1"
edges to this list, not "num_parents - 2". That is the basic error.
The reason this was not caught in the test suite is more subtle.
In 5324-split-commit-graph.sh, we test creating an octopus merge
and adding it to the tip of a commit-graph chain, then verify the
result. This _should_ have caught the problem, except that when
we load the commit-graph files we were overly careful to not fail
when the commit-graph chain does not match. This care was on
purpose to avoid race conditions as one process reads the chain
and another process modifies it. In such a case, the reading
process outputs the following message to stderr:
warning: commit-graph chain does not match
These warnings are output in the test suite, but ignored. By
checking the stderr of `git commit-graph verify` to include
the expected progress output, it will now catch this error.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
While 'git commit-graph write --stdin-commits' expects commit object
ids as input, it accepts and silently skips over any invalid commit
object ids, and still exits with success:
# nonsense
$ echo not-a-commit-oid | git commit-graph write --stdin-commits
$ echo $?
0
# sometimes I forgot that refs are not good...
$ echo HEAD | git commit-graph write --stdin-commits
$ echo $?
0
# valid tree OID, but not a commit OID
$ git rev-parse HEAD^{tree} | git commit-graph write --stdin-commits
$ echo $?
0
$ ls -l .git/objects/info/commit-graph
ls: cannot access '.git/objects/info/commit-graph': No such file or directory
Check that all input records are indeed valid commit object ids and
return with error otherwise, the same way '--stdin-packs' handles
invalid input; see e103f7276f (commit-graph: return with errors during
write, 2019-06-12).
Note that it should only return with error when encountering an
invalid commit object id coming from standard input. However,
'--reachable' uses the same code path to process object ids pointed to
by all refs, and that includes tag object ids as well, which should
still be skipped over. Therefore add a new flag to 'enum
commit_graph_write_flags' and a corresponding field to 'struct
write_commit_graph_context', so we can differentiate between those two
cases.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The commits in a repository can be described by multiple
commit-graph files now, which allows the commit-graph files to be
updated incrementally.
* ds/commit-graph-incremental:
commit-graph: test verify across alternates
commit-graph: normalize commit-graph filenames
commit-graph: test --split across alternate without --split
commit-graph: test octopus merges with --split
commit-graph: clean up chains after flattened write
commit-graph: verify chains with --shallow mode
commit-graph: create options for split files
commit-graph: expire commit-graph files
commit-graph: allow cross-alternate chains
commit-graph: merge commit-graph chains
commit-graph: add --split option to builtin
commit-graph: write commit-graph chains
commit-graph: rearrange chunk count logic
commit-graph: add base graphs chunk
commit-graph: load commit-graph chains
commit-graph: rename commit_compare to oid_compare
commit-graph: prepare for commit-graph chains
commit-graph: document commit-graph chains
Code clean-up to remove hardcoded SHA-1 hash from many places.
* jk/oidhash:
hashmap: convert sha1hash() to oidhash()
hash.h: move object_id definition from cache.h
khash: rename oid helper functions
khash: drop sha1-specific map types
pack-bitmap: convert khash_sha1 maps into kh_oid_map
delta-islands: convert island_marks khash to use oids
khash: rename kh_oid_t to kh_oid_set
khash: drop broken oid_map typedef
object: convert create_object() to use object_id
object: convert internal hash_obj() to object_id
object: convert lookup_object() to use object_id
object: convert lookup_unknown_object() to use object_id
pack-objects: convert locate_object_entry_hash() to object_id
pack-objects: convert packlist_find() to use object_id
pack-bitmap-write: convert some helpers to use object_id
upload-pack: rename a "sha1" variable to "oid"
describe: fix accidental oid/hash type-punning
The commit-graph file is now part of the "files that the runtime
may keep open file descriptors on, all of which would need to be
closed when done with the object store", and the file descriptor to
an existing commit-graph file now is closed before "gc" finalizes a
new instance to replace it.
* ds/close-object-store:
packfile: rename close_all_packs to close_object_store
packfile: close commit-graph in close_all_packs
commit-graph: use raw_object_store when closing
There are no callers left of create_object() that aren't just passing us
the "hash" member of a "struct object_id". Let's take the whole struct,
which gets us closer to removing all raw sha1 variables.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When writing commit-graph files, we append path data to an
object directory, which may be specified by the user via the
'--object-dir' option. If the user supplies a trailing slash,
or some other alternative path format, the resulting path may
be usable for writing to the correct location. However, when
expiring graph files from the <obj-dir>/info/commit-graphs
directory during a write, we need to compare paths with exact
string matches.
Normalize the commit-graph filenames to avoid ambiguity. This
creates extra allocations, but this is a constant multiple of
the number of commit-graph files, which should be a number in
the single digits.
Further normalize the object directory in the context. Due to
a comparison between g->obj_dir and ctx->obj_dir in
split_graph_merge_strategy(), a trailing slash would prevent
any merging of layers within the same object directory. The
check is there to ensure we do not merge across alternates.
Update the tests to include a case with this trailing slash
problem.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When searching for a commit in a commit-graph chain of G graphs with N
commits, the search takes O(G log N) time. If we always add a new tip
graph with every write, the linear G term will start to dominate and
slow the lookup process.
To keep lookups fast, but also keep most incremental writes fast, create
a strategy for merging levels of the commit-graph chain. The strategy is
detailed in the commit-graph design document, but is summarized by these
two conditions:
1. If the number of commits we are adding is more than half the number
of commits in the graph below, then merge with that graph.
2. If we are writing more than 64,000 commits into a single graph,
then merge with all lower graphs.
The numeric values in the conditions above are currently constant, but
can become config options in a future update.
As we merge levels of the commit-graph chain, check that the commits
still exist in the repository. A garbage-collection operation may have
removed those commits from the object store and we do not want to
persist them in the commit-graph chain. This is a non-issue if the
'git gc' process wrote a new, single-level commit-graph file.
After we merge levels, the old graph-{hash}.graph files are no longer
referenced by the commit-graph-chain file. We will expire these files in
a future change.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a new "--split" option to the 'git commit-graph write' subcommand. This
option allows the optional behavior of writing a commit-graph chain.
The current behavior will add a tip commit-graph containing any commits that
are not in the existing commit-graph or commit-graph chain. Later changes
will allow merging the chain and expiring out-dated files.
Add a new test script (t5324-split-commit-graph.sh) that demonstrates this
behavior.
Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Extend write_commit_graph() to write a commit-graph chain when given the
COMMIT_GRAPH_SPLIT flag.
This implementation is purposefully simplistic in how it creates a new
chain. The commits not already in the chain are added to a new tip
commit-graph file.
Much of the logic around writing a graph-{hash}.graph file and updating
the commit-graph-chain file is the same as the commit-graph file case.
However, there are several places where we need to do some extra logic
in the split case.
Track the list of graph filenames before and after the planned write.
This will be more important when we start merging graph files, but it
also allows us to upgrade our commit-graph file to the appropriate
graph-{hash}.graph file when we upgrade to a chain of commit-graphs.
Note that we use the eighth byte of the commit-graph header to store the
number of base graph files. This determines the length of the base
graphs chunk.
A subtle change of behavior with the new logic is that we do not write a
commit-graph if we our commit list is empty. This extends to the typical
case, which is reflected in t5318-commit-graph.sh.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If we write a commit-graph file without the split option, then
we write to $OBJDIR/info/commit-graph and start to ignore
the chains in $OBJDIR/info/commit-graphs/.
Unlink the commit-graph-chain file and expire the graph-{hash}.graph
files in $OBJDIR/info/commit-graphs/ during every write.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The number of chunks in a commit-graph file can change depending on
whether we need the Extra Edges Chunk. We are going to add more optional
chunks, and it will be helpful to rearrange this logic around the chunk
count before doing so.
Specifically, we need to finalize the number of chunks before writing
the commit-graph header. Further, we also need to fill out the chunk
lookup table dynamically and using "num_chunks" as we add optional
chunks is useful for adding optional chunks in the future.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If we wrote a commit-graph chain, we only modified the tip file in
the chain. It is valuable to verify what we wrote, but not waste
time checking files we did not write.
Add a '--shallow' option to the 'git commit-graph verify' subcommand
and check that it does not read the base graph in a two-file chain.
Making the verify subcommand read from a chain of commit-graphs takes
some rearranging of the builtin code.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To quickly verify a commit-graph chain is valid on load, we will
read from the new "Base Graphs Chunk" of each file in the chain.
This will prevent accidentally loading incorrect data from manually
editing the commit-graph-chain file or renaming graph-{hash}.graph
files.
The commit_graph struct already had an object_id struct "oid", but
it was never initialized or used. Add a line to read the hash from
the end of the commit-graph file and into the oid member.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The split commit-graph feature is now fully implemented, but needs
some more run-time configurability. Allow direct callers to 'git
commit-graph write --split' to specify the values used in the
merge strategy and the expire time.
Update the documentation to specify these values.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Prepare the logic for reading a chain of commit-graphs.
First, look for a file at $OBJDIR/info/commit-graph. If it exists,
then use that file and stop.
Next, look for the chain file at $OBJDIR/info/commit-graphs/commit-graph-chain.
If this file exists, then load the hash values as line-separated values in that
file and load $OBJDIR/info/commit-graphs/graph-{hash[i]}.graph for each hash[i]
in that file. The file is given in order, so the first hash corresponds to the
"base" file and the final hash corresponds to the "tip" file.
This implementation assumes that all of the graph-{hash}.graph files are in
the same object directory as the commit-graph-chain file. This will be updated
in a future change. This change is purposefully simple so we can isolate the
different concerns.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As we merge commit-graph files in a commit-graph chain, we should clean
up the files that are no longer used.
This change introduces an 'expiry_window' value to the context, which is
always zero (for now). We then check the modified time of each
graph-{hash}.graph file in the $OBJDIR/info/commit-graphs folder and
unlink the files that are older than the expiry_window.
Since this is always zero, this immediately clears all unused graph
files. We will update the value to match a config setting in a future
change.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The helper function commit_compare() actually compares object_id
structs, not commits. A future change to commit-graph.c will need
to sort commit structs, so rename this function in advance.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In an environment like a fork network, it is helpful to have a
commit-graph chain that spans both the base repo and the fork repo. The
fork is usually a small set of data on top of the large repo, but
sometimes the fork is much larger. For example, git-for-windows/git has
almost double the number of commits as git/git because it rebases its
commits on every major version update.
To allow cross-alternate commit-graph chains, we need a few pieces:
1. When looking for a graph-{hash}.graph file, check all alternates.
2. When merging commit-graph chains, do not merge across alternates.
3. When writing a new commit-graph chain based on a commit-graph file
in another object directory, do not allow success if the base file
has of the name "commit-graph" instead of
"commit-graphs/graph-{hash}.graph".
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To prepare for a chain of commit-graph files, augment the
commit_graph struct to point to a base commit_graph. As we load
commits from the graph, we may actually want to read from a base
file according to the graph position.
The "graph position" of a commit is given by concatenating the
lexicographic commit orders from each of the commit-graph files in
the chain. This means that we must distinguish two values:
* lexicographic index : the position within the lexicographic
order in a single commit-graph file.
* graph position: the position within the concatenated order
of multiple commit-graph files
Given the lexicographic index of a commit in a graph, we can
compute the graph position by adding the number of commits in
the lower-level graphs. To find the lexicographic index of
a commit, we subtract the number of commits in lower-level graphs.
While here, change insert_parent_or_die() to take a uint32_t
position, as that is the type used by its only caller and that
makes more sense with the limits in the commit-graph format.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The close_commit_graph() method took a repository struct, but then
only uses the raw_object_store within. Change the function prototype
to make the method more flexible.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The write_commit_graph() method is too complex, so we are
extracting helper functions one by one.
Extract write_commit_graph_file() that takes all of the information
in the context struct and writes the data to a commit-graph file.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The write_commit_graph() method is too complex, so we are
extracting helper functions one by one.
Extract copy_oids_to_commits(), which fills the commits list
with the distinct commits from the oids list. During this loop,
it also counts the number of "extra" edges from octopus merges.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The write_commit_graph() method is too complex, so we are
extracting helper functions one by one.
Extract count_distinct_commits(), which sorts the oids list, then
iterates through to find duplicates.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The write_commit_graph() method is too complex, so we are
extracting helper functions one by one.
Extract fill_oids_from_all_packs() that reads all pack-files
for commits and fills the oid list in the context.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The write_commit_graph() method is too complex, so we are
extracting helper functions one by one.
Extract fill_oids_from_commit_hex() that reads the given commit
id list and fille the oid list in the context.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The write_commit_graph() method is too complex, so we are
extracting helper functions one by one.
This extracts fill_oids_from_packs() that reads the given
pack-file list and fills the oid list in the context.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The write_commit_graph() method is too large and complex. To simplify
it, we should extract several helper functions. However, we will risk
repeating a lot of declarations related to progress incidators and
object id or commit lists.
Create a new write_commit_graph_context struct that contains the
core data structures used in this process. Replace the other local
variables with the values inside the context object. Following this
change, we will start to lift code segments wholesale out of the
write_commit_graph() method and into helper functions.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The write_commit_graph() and write_commit_graph_reachable() methods
currently take two boolean parameters: 'append' and 'report_progress'.
As we update these methods, adding more parameters this way becomes
cluttered and hard to maintain.
Collapse these parameters into a 'flags' parameter, and adjust the
callers to provide flags as necessary.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The write_commit_graph() method uses die() to report failure and
exit when confronted with an unexpected condition. This use of
die() in a library function is incorrect and is now replaced by
error() statements and an int return type. Return zero on success
and a negative value on failure.
Now that we use 'goto cleanup' to jump to the terminal condition
on an error, we have new paths that could lead to uninitialized
values. New initializers are added to correct for this.
The builtins 'commit-graph', 'gc', and 'commit' call these methods,
so update them to check the return value. Test that 'git commit-graph
write' returns a proper error code when hitting a failure condition
in write_commit_graph().
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Further code clean-up to allow the lowest level of name-to-object
mapping layer to work with a passed-in repository other than the
default one.
* nd/sha1-name-c-wo-the-repository: (34 commits)
sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from get_oid_mb()
sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from other get_oid_*
sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from maybe_die_on_misspelt_object_name
submodule-config.c: use repo_get_oid for reading .gitmodules
sha1-name.c: add repo_get_oid()
sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from get_oid_with_context_1()
sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from resolve_relative_path()
sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from diagnose_invalid_index_path()
sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from handle_one_ref()
sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from get_oid_1()
sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from get_oid_basic()
sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from get_describe_name()
sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from get_oid_oneline()
sha1-name.c: add repo_interpret_branch_name()
sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from interpret_branch_mark()
sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from interpret_nth_prior_checkout()
sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from get_short_oid()
sha1-name.c: add repo_for_each_abbrev()
sha1-name.c: store and use repo in struct disambiguate_state
sha1-name.c: add repo_find_unique_abbrev_r()
...
Free the commit graph when verify_commit_graph_lite() reports an error.
Credit to OSS-Fuzz for finding this leak.
Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"maybe" pointer in 'struct commit' is tricky because it can be lazily
initialized to take advantage of commit-graph if available. This makes
it not safe to access directly.
This leads to a rule in commit.cocci to rewrite 'x->maybe_tree' to
'get_commit_tree(x)'. But that rule alone could lead to incorrectly
rewrite assignments, e.g. from
x->maybe_tree = yes
to
get_commit_tree(x) = yes
Because of this we have a second rule to revert this effect. Szeder
found out that we could do better by performing the assignment rewrite
rule first, then the remaining is read-only access and handled by the
current first rule.
For this to work, we need to transform "x->maybe_tree = y" to something
that does NOT contain "x->maybe_tree" to avoid the original first
rule. This is where set_commit_tree() comes in.
Helped-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Change the error emitted when a commit-graph file is corrupt so that
we actually mention the commit-graph, e.g. change errors like:
error: improper chunk offset 0000000000385e0c
To:
error: commit-graph improper chunk offset 0000000000385e0c
As discussed in the commits leading up to this one the commit-graph
machinery is now used by common commands like "status". If the graph
was corrupt we'd often emit some error that gave no indication what
was wrong. Now some of them are still cryptic, but they'll at least
mention "commit-graph" to give the user a hint as to where to look.
While I'm at it mark some of the strings that hadn't been marked for
translation. It's clear from the commit history and the code that this
was merely forgotten at the time, and wasn't intentional.p5
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the commit-graph is written we end up calling
parse_commit(). This will in turn invoke code that'll consult the
existing commit-graph about the commit, if the graph is corrupted we
die.
We thus get into a state where a failing "commit-graph verify" can't
be followed-up with a "commit-graph write" if core.commitGraph=true is
set, the graph either needs to be manually removed to proceed, or
core.commitGraph needs to be set to "false".
Change the "commit-graph write" codepath to use a new
parse_commit_no_graph() helper instead of parse_commit() to avoid
this. The latter will call repo_parse_commit_internal() with
use_commit_graph=1 as seen in 177722b344 ("commit: integrate commit
graph with commit parsing", 2018-04-10).
Not using the old graph at all slows down the writing of the new graph
by some small amount, but is a sensible way to prevent an error in the
existing commit-graph from spreading.
Just fixing the current issue would be likely to result in code that's
inadvertently broken in the future. New code might use the
commit-graph at a distance. To detect such cases introduce a
"GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_DIE_ON_LOAD" setting used when we do our
corruption tests, and test that a "write/verify" combo works after
every one of our current test cases where we now detect commit-graph
corruption.
Some of the code changes here might be strictly unnecessary, e.g. I
was unable to find cases where the parse_commit() called from
write_graph_chunk_data() didn't exit early due to
"item->object.parsed" being true in
repo_parse_commit_internal() (before the use_commit_graph=1 has any
effect). But let's also convert those cases for good measure, we do
not have exhaustive tests for all possible types of commit-graph
corruption.
This might need to be re-visited if we learn to write the commit-graph
incrementally, but probably not. Hopefully we'll just start by finding
out what commits we have in total, then read the old graph(s) to see
what they cover, and finally write a new graph file with everything
that's missing. In that case the new graph writing code just needs to
continue to use e.g. a parse_commit() that doesn't consult the
existing commit-graphs.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
An earlier change implemented load_commit_graph_one_fd_st() in a way
that was bug-compatible with earlier code in terms of the "graph file
%s is too small" error message printing out the path to the
commit-graph (".git/objects/info/commit-graph").
But change that, because:
* A function that takes an already-open file descriptor also needing
the filename isn't very intuitive.
* The vast majority of errors we might emit when loading the graph
come from parse_commit_graph(), which doesn't report the
filename. Let's not do that either in this case for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make the commit-graph loading code work as a library that returns an
error code instead of calling exit(1) when the commit-graph is
corrupt. This means that e.g. "status" will now report commit-graph
corruption as an "error: [...]" at the top of its output, but then
proceed to work normally.
This required splitting up the load_commit_graph_one() function so
that the code that deals with open()-ing and stat()-ing the graph can
now be called independently as open_commit_graph().
This is needed because "commit-graph verify" where the graph doesn't
exist isn't an error. See the third paragraph in
283e68c72f ("commit-graph: add 'verify' subcommand",
2018-06-27). There's a bug in that logic where we conflate the
intended ENOENT with other errno values (e.g. EACCES), but this change
doesn't address that. That'll be addressed in a follow-up change.
I'm then splitting most of the logic out of load_commit_graph_one()
into load_commit_graph_one_fd_st(), which allows for providing an
existing file descriptor and stat information to the loading
code. This isn't strictly needed, but it would be redundant and
confusing to open() and stat() the file twice for some of the
codepaths, this allows for calling open_commit_graph() followed by
load_commit_graph_one_fd_st(). The "graph_file" still needs to be
passed to that function for the the "graph file %s is too small" error
message.
This leaves load_commit_graph_one() unused by everything except the
internal prepare_commit_graph_one() function, so let's mark it as
"static". If someone needs it in the future we can remove the "static"
attribute. I could also rewrite its sole remaining
user ("prepare_commit_graph_one()") to use
load_commit_graph_one_fd_st() instead, but let's leave it at this.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When core.commitGraph=true is set, various common commands now consult
the commit graph. Because the commit-graph code is very trusting of
its input data, it's possibly to construct a graph that'll cause an
immediate segfault on e.g. "status" (and e.g. "log", "blame", ...). In
some other cases where git immediately exits with a cryptic error
about the graph being broken.
The root cause of this is that while the "commit-graph verify"
sub-command exhaustively verifies the graph, other users of the graph
simply trust the graph, and will e.g. deference data found at certain
offsets as pointers, causing segfaults.
This change does the bare minimum to ensure that we don't segfault in
the common fill_commit_in_graph() codepath called by
e.g. setup_revisions(), to do this instrument the "commit-graph
verify" tests to always check if "status" would subsequently
segfault. This fixes the following tests which would previously
segfault:
not ok 50 - detect low chunk count
not ok 51 - detect missing OID fanout chunk
not ok 52 - detect missing OID lookup chunk
not ok 53 - detect missing commit data chunk
Those happened because with the commit-graph enabled setup_revisions()
would eventually call fill_commit_in_graph(), where e.g.
g->chunk_commit_data is used early as an offset (and will be
0x0). With this change we get far enough to detect that the graph is
broken, and show an error instead. E.g.:
$ git status; echo $?
error: commit-graph is missing the Commit Data chunk
1
That also sucks, we should *warn* and not hard-fail "status" just
because the commit-graph is corrupt, but fixing is left to a follow-up
change.
A side-effect of changing the reporting from graph_report() to error()
is that we now have an "error: " prefix for these even for
"commit-graph verify". Pseudo-diff before/after:
$ git commit-graph verify
-commit-graph is missing the Commit Data chunk
+error: commit-graph is missing the Commit Data chunk
Changing that is OK. Various errors it emits now early on are prefixed
with "error: ", moving these over and changing the output doesn't
break anything.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The codepath to show progress meter while writing out commit-graph
file has been improved.
* ab/commit-graph-write-progress:
commit-graph write: emit a percentage for all progress
commit-graph write: add itermediate progress
commit-graph write: remove empty line for readability
commit-graph write: add more descriptive progress output
commit-graph write: show progress for object search
commit-graph write: more descriptive "writing out" output
commit-graph write: add "Writing out" progress output
commit-graph: don't call write_graph_chunk_extra_edges() unnecessarily
commit-graph: rename "large edges" to "extra edges"
The codepath to write out commit-graph has been optimized by
following the usual pattern of visiting objects in in-pack order.
* ab/commit-graph-write-optim:
commit-graph write: use pack order when finding commits
The codepath to read from the commit-graph file attempted to read
past the end of it when the file's table-of-contents was corrupt.
* js/commit-graph-chunk-table-fix:
Makefile: correct example fuzz build
commit-graph: fix buffer read-overflow
commit-graph, fuzz: add fuzzer for commit-graph
The in-core repository instances are passed through more codepaths.
* sb/more-repo-in-api: (23 commits)
t/helper/test-repository: celebrate independence from the_repository
path.h: make REPO_GIT_PATH_FUNC repository agnostic
commit: prepare free_commit_buffer and release_commit_memory for any repo
commit-graph: convert remaining functions to handle any repo
submodule: don't add submodule as odb for push
submodule: use submodule repos for object lookup
pretty: prepare format_commit_message to handle arbitrary repositories
commit: prepare logmsg_reencode to handle arbitrary repositories
commit: prepare repo_unuse_commit_buffer to handle any repo
commit: prepare get_commit_buffer to handle any repo
commit-reach: prepare in_merge_bases[_many] to handle any repo
commit-reach: prepare get_merge_bases to handle any repo
commit-reach.c: allow get_merge_bases_many_0 to handle any repo
commit-reach.c: allow remove_redundant to handle any repo
commit-reach.c: allow merge_bases_many to handle any repo
commit-reach.c: allow paint_down_to_common to handle any repo
commit: allow parse_commit* to handle any repo
object: parse_object to honor its repository argument
object-store: prepare has_{sha1, object}_file to handle any repo
object-store: prepare read_object_file to deal with any repo
...
Add sha-256 hash and plug it through the code to allow building Git
with the "NewHash".
* bc/sha-256:
hash: add an SHA-256 implementation using OpenSSL
sha256: add an SHA-256 implementation using libgcrypt
Add a base implementation of SHA-256 support
commit-graph: convert to using the_hash_algo
t/helper: add a test helper to compute hash speed
sha1-file: add a constant for hash block size
t: make the sha1 test-tool helper generic
t: add basic tests for our SHA-1 implementation
cache: make hashcmp and hasheq work with larger hashes
hex: introduce functions to print arbitrary hashes
sha1-file: provide functions to look up hash algorithms
sha1-file: rename algorithm to "sha1"
Follow-up 01ca387774 ("commit-graph: split up close_reachable()
progress output", 2018-11-19) by making the progress bars in
close_reachable() report a completion percentage. This fixes the last
occurrence where in the commit graph writing where we didn't report
that.
The change in 01ca387774 split up the 1x progress bar in
close_reachable() into 3x, but left them as dumb counters without a
percentage completion. Fixing that is easy, and the only reason it
wasn't done already is because that commit was rushed in during the
v2.20.0 RC period to fix the unrelated issue of over-reporting commit
numbers. See [1] and follow-ups for ML activity at the time and [2]
for an alternative approach where the progress bars weren't split up.
Now for e.g. linux.git we'll emit:
$ ~/g/git/git --exec-path=$HOME/g/git commit-graph write
Finding commits for commit graph among packed objects: 100% (6529159/6529159), done.
Expanding reachable commits in commit graph: 100% (815990/815980), done.
Computing commit graph generation numbers: 100% (815983/815983), done.
Writing out commit graph in 4 passes: 100% (3263932/3263932), done.
1. https://public-inbox.org/git/20181119202300.18670-1-avarab@gmail.com/
2. https://public-inbox.org/git/20181122153922.16912-11-avarab@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add progress output to sections of code between "Annotating[...]" and
"Computing[...]generation numbers". This can collectively take 5-10
seconds on a large enough repository.
On a test repository with I have with ~7 million commits and ~50
million objects we'll now emit:
$ ~/g/git/git --exec-path=$HOME/g/git commit-graph write
Finding commits for commit graph among packed objects: 100% (124763727/124763727), done.
Loading known commits in commit graph: 100% (18989461/18989461), done.
Expanding reachable commits in commit graph: 100% (18989507/18989461), done.
Clearing commit marks in commit graph: 100% (18989507/18989507), done.
Counting distinct commits in commit graph: 100% (18989507/18989507), done.
Finding extra edges in commit graph: 100% (18989507/18989507), done.
Computing commit graph generation numbers: 100% (7250302/7250302), done.
Writing out commit graph in 4 passes: 100% (29001208/29001208), done.
Whereas on a medium-sized repository such as linux.git these new
progress bars won't have time to kick in and as before and we'll still
emit output like:
$ ~/g/git/git --exec-path=$HOME/g/git commit-graph write
Finding commits for commit graph among packed objects: 100% (6529159/6529159), done.
Expanding reachable commits in commit graph: 815990, done.
Computing commit graph generation numbers: 100% (815983/815983), done.
Writing out commit graph in 4 passes: 100% (3263932/3263932), done.
The "Counting distinct commits in commit graph" phase will spend most
of its time paused at "0/*" as we QSORT(...) the list. That's not
optimal, but at least we don't seem to be stalling anymore most of the
time.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Remove the empty line between a QSORT(...) and the subsequent oideq()
for-loop. This makes it clearer that the QSORT(...) is being done so
that we can run the oideq() loop on adjacent OIDs. Amends code added
in 08fd81c9b6 ("commit-graph: implement write_commit_graph()",
2018-04-02).
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make the progress output shown when we're searching for commits to
include in the graph more descriptive. This amends code I added in
7b0f229222 ("commit-graph write: add progress output", 2018-09-17).
Now, on linux.git, we'll emit this sort of output in the various modes
we support:
$ git commit-graph write
Finding commits for commit graph among packed objects: 100% (6529159/6529159), done.
[...]
# Actually we don't emit this since this takes almost no time at
# all. But if we did (s/_delayed//) we'd show:
$ git for-each-ref --format='%(objectname)' | git commit-graph write --stdin-commits
Finding commits for commit graph from 630 refs: 100% (630/630), done.
[...]
$ (cd .git/objects/pack/ && ls *idx) | git commit-graph write --stdin-pack
Finding commits for commit graph in 3 packs: 6529159, done.
[...]
The middle on of those is going to be the output users might see in
practice, since it'll be emitted when they get the commit graph via
gc.writeCommitGraph=true. But as noted above you need a really large
number of refs for this message to show. It'll show up on a test
repository I have with ~165k refs:
Finding commits for commit graph from 165203 refs: 100% (165203/165203), done.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Show the percentage progress for the "Finding commits for commit
graph" phase for the common case where we're operating on all packs in
the repository, as "commit-graph write" or "gc" will do.
Before we'd emit on e.g. linux.git with "commit-graph write":
Finding commits for commit graph: 6529159, done.
[...]
And now:
Finding commits for commit graph: 100% (6529159/6529159), done.
[...]
Since the commit graph only includes those commits that are packed
(via for_each_packed_object(...)) the approximate_object_count()
returns the actual number of objects we're going to process.
Still, it is possible due to a race with "gc" or another process
maintaining packs that the number of objects we're going to process is
lower than what approximate_object_count() reported. In that case we
don't want to stop the progress bar short of 100%. So let's make sure
it snaps to 100% at the end.
The inverse case is also possible and more likely. I.e. that a new
pack has been added between approximate_object_count() and
for_each_packed_object(). In that case the percentage will go beyond
100%, and we'll do nothing to snap it back to 100% at the end.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make the "Writing out" part of the progress output more
descriptive. Depending on the shape of the graph we either make 3 or 4
passes over it.
Let's present this information to the user in case they're wondering
what this number, which is much larger than their number of commits,
has to do with writing out the commit graph. Now e.g. on linux.git we
emit:
$ ~/g/git/git --exec-path=$HOME/g/git -C ~/g/linux commit-graph write
Finding commits for commit graph: 6529159, done.
Expanding reachable commits in commit graph: 815990, done.
Computing commit graph generation numbers: 100% (815983/815983), done.
Writing out commit graph in 4 passes: 100% (3263932/3263932), done.
A note on i18n: Why are we using the Q_() function and passing a
number & English text for a singular which'll never be used? Because
the plural rules of translated languages may not match those of
English, and to use the plural function we need to use this format.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add progress output to be shown when we're writing out the
commit-graph, this adds to the output already added in 7b0f229222
("commit-graph write: add progress output", 2018-09-17).
As noted in that commit most of the progress output isn't displayed on
small repositories, but before this change we'd noticeably hang for
2-3 seconds at the end on medium sized repositories such as linux.git.
Now we'll instead show output like this, and reduce the
human-observable times at which we're not producing progress output:
$ ~/g/git/git --exec-path=$HOME/g/git -C ~/g/2015-04-03-1M-git commit-graph write
Finding commits for commit graph: 13064614, done.
Expanding reachable commits in commit graph: 1000447, done.
Computing commit graph generation numbers: 100% (1000447/1000447), done.
Writing out commit graph: 100% (3001341/3001341), done.
This "Writing out" number is 3x or 4x the number of commits, depending
on the graph we're processing. A later change will make this explicit
to the user.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The optional 'Extra Edge List' chunk of the commit graph file stores
parent information for commits with more than two parents. Since the
chunk is optional, write_commit_graph() looks through all commits to
find those with more than two parents, and then writes the commit
graph file header accordingly, i.e. if there are no such commits, then
there won't be a 'Extra Edge List' chunk written, only the three
mandatory chunks.
However, when it later comes to writing actual chunk data,
write_commit_graph() unconditionally invokes
write_graph_chunk_extra_edges(), even when it was decided earlier that
that chunk won't be written. Strictly speaking there is no bug here,
because write_graph_chunk_extra_edges() won't write anything if it
doesn't find any commits with more than two parents, but then it
unnecessarily and in vain looks through all commits once again in
search for such commits.
Don't call write_graph_chunk_extra_edges() when that chunk won't be
written to spare an unnecessary iteration over all commits.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The optional 'Large Edge List' chunk of the commit graph file stores
parent information for commits with more than two parents, and the
names of most of the macros, variables, struct fields, and functions
related to this chunk contain the term "large edges", e.g.
write_graph_chunk_large_edges(). However, it's not a really great
term, as the edges to the second and subsequent parents stored in this
chunk are not any larger than the edges to the first and second
parents stored in the "main" 'Commit Data' chunk. It's the number of
edges, IOW number of parents, that is larger compared to non-merge and
"regular" two-parent merge commits. And indeed, two functions in
'commit-graph.c' have a local variable called 'num_extra_edges' that
refer to the same thing, and this "extra edges" term is much better at
describing these edges.
So let's rename all these references to "large edges" in macro,
variable, function, etc. names to "extra edges". There is a
GRAPH_OCTOPUS_EDGES_NEEDED macro as well; for the sake of consistency
rename it to GRAPH_EXTRA_EDGES_NEEDED.
We can do so safely without causing any incompatibility issues,
because the term "large edges" doesn't come up in the file format
itself in any form (the chunk's magic is {'E', 'D', 'G', 'E'}, there
is no 'L' in there), but only in the specification text. The string
"large edges", however, does come up in the output of 'git
commit-graph read' and in tests looking at its input, but that command
is explicitly documented as debugging aid, so we can change its output
and the affected tests safely.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Slightly optimize the "commit-graph write" step by using
FOR_EACH_OBJECT_PACK_ORDER with for_each_object_in_pack(). See commit
[1] and [2] for the facility and a similar optimization for "cat-file".
On Linux it is around 5% slower to run:
echo 1 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches &&
cat .git/objects/pack/* >/dev/null &&
git cat-file --batch-all-objects --batch-check --unordered
Than the same thing with the "cat" omitted. This is as expected, since
we're iterating in pack order and the "cat" is extra work.
Before this change the opposite was true of "commit-graph write". We
were 6% faster if we first ran "cat" to efficiently populate the FS
cache for our sole big pack on linux.git, than if we had populated it
via for_each_object_in_pack(). Now we're 3% faster without the "cat"
instead.
My tests were done on an unloaded Linux 3.10 system with 10 runs for
each. Derrick Stolee did his own tests on Windows[3] showing a 2%
improvement with a high degree of accuracy.
1. 736eb88fdc ("for_each_packed_object: support iterating in
pack-order", 2018-08-10)
2. 0750bb5b51 ("cat-file: support "unordered" output for
--batch-all-objects", 2018-08-10)
3. https://public-inbox.org/git/f71fa868-25e8-a9c9-46a6-611b987f1a8f@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
fuzz-commit-graph identified a case where Git will read past the end of
a buffer containing a commit graph if the graph's header has an
incorrect chunk count. A simple bounds check in parse_commit_graph()
prevents this.
Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Break load_commit_graph_one() into a new function, parse_commit_graph().
The latter function operates on arbitrary buffers, which makes it
suitable as a fuzzing target. Since parse_commit_graph() is only called
by load_commit_graph_one() (and the fuzzer described below), we omit
error messages that would be duplicated by the caller.
Adds fuzz-commit-graph.c, which provides a fuzzing entry point
compatible with libFuzzer (and possibly other fuzzing engines).
Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When writing a commit-graph, we write GRAPH_MISSING_PARENT if the
parent's object id does not appear in the list of commits to be
written into the commit-graph. This was done as the initial design
allowed commits to have missing parents, but the final version
requires the commit-graph to be closed under reachability. Thus,
this GRAPH_MISSING_PARENT value should never be written.
However, there are reasons why it could be written! These range
from a bug in the reachable-closure code to a memory error causing
the binary search into the list of object ids to fail. In either
case, we should fail fast and avoid writing the commit-graph file
with bad data.
Remove the GRAPH_MISSING_PARENT constant in favor of the constant
GRAPH_EDGE_LAST_MASK, which has the same value.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Convert all functions to handle arbitrary repositories in commit-graph.c
that are used by functions taking a repository argument already.
Notable exclusion is write_commit_graph and its local functions as that
only works on the_repository.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Amend the progress output added in 7b0f229222 ("commit-graph write:
add progress output", 2018-09-17) so that the total numbers it reports
aren't higher than the total number of commits anymore. See [1] for a
bug report pointing that out.
When I added this I wasn't intending to provide an accurate count, but
just have some progress output to show the user the command wasn't
hanging[2]. But since we are showing numbers, let's make them
accurate. The progress descriptions were suggested by Derrick Stolee
in [3].
As noted in [2] we are unlikely to show anything except the "Expanding
reachable..." message even on fairly large repositories such as
linux.git. On a test repository I have with north of 7 million commits
all of these are displayed. Two of them don't show up for long, but as
noted in [5] future-proofing this for if the loops become more
expensive in the future makes sense.
1. https://public-inbox.org/git/20181010203738.GE23446@szeder.dev/
2. https://public-inbox.org/git/87pnwhea8y.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/
3. https://public-inbox.org/git/f7a0cbee-863c-61d3-4959-5cec8b43c705@gmail.com/
4. https://public-inbox.org/git/20181015160545.GG19800@szeder.dev/
5. https://public-inbox.org/git/87murle8da.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/
Reported-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of using hard-coded constants for object sizes, use
the_hash_algo to look them up. In addition, use a function call to look
up the object ID version and produce the correct value. For now, we use
version 1, which means to use the default algorithm used in the rest of
the repository.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Our handling of alternate object directories is needlessly different
from the main object directory. As a result, many places in the code
basically look like this:
do_something(r->objects->objdir);
for (odb = r->objects->alt_odb_list; odb; odb = odb->next)
do_something(odb->path);
That gets annoying when do_something() is non-trivial, and we've
resorted to gross hacks like creating fake alternates (see
find_short_object_filename()).
Instead, let's give each raw_object_store a unified list of
object_directory structs. The first will be the main store, and
everything after is an alternate. Very few callers even care about the
distinction, and can just loop over the whole list (and those who care
can just treat the first element differently).
A few observations:
- we don't need r->objects->objectdir anymore, and can just
mechanically convert that to r->objects->odb->path
- object_directory's path field needs to become a real pointer rather
than a FLEX_ARRAY, in order to fill it with expand_base_dir()
- we'll call prepare_alt_odb() earlier in many functions (i.e.,
outside of the loop). This may result in us calling it even when our
function would be satisfied looking only at the main odb.
But this doesn't matter in practice. It's not a very expensive
operation in the first place, and in the majority of cases it will
be a noop. We call it already (and cache its results) in
prepare_packed_git(), and we'll generally check packs before loose
objects. So essentially every program is going to call it
immediately once per program.
Arguably we should just prepare_alt_odb() immediately upon setting
up the repository's object directory, which would save us sprinkling
calls throughout the code base (and forgetting to do so has been a
source of subtle bugs in the past). But I've stopped short of that
here, since there are already a lot of other moving parts in this
patch.
- Most call sites just get shorter. The check_and_freshen() functions
are an exception, because they have entry points to handle local and
nonlocal directories separately.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In preparation for unifying the handling of alt odb's and the normal
repo object directory, let's use a more neutral name. This patch is
purely mechanical, swapping the type name, and converting any variables
named "alt" to "odb". There should be no functional change, but it will
reduce the noise in subsequent diffs.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The recently introduced commit-graph auxiliary data is incompatible
with mechanisms such as replace & grafts that "breaks" immutable
nature of the object reference relationship. Disable optimizations
based on its use (and updating existing commit-graph) when these
incompatible features are in use in the repository.
* ds/commit-graph-with-grafts:
commit-graph: close_commit_graph before shallow walk
commit-graph: not compatible with uninitialized repo
commit-graph: not compatible with grafts
commit-graph: not compatible with replace objects
test-repository: properly init repo
commit-graph: update design document
refs.c: upgrade for_each_replace_ref to be a each_repo_ref_fn callback
refs.c: migrate internal ref iteration to pass thru repository argument
Generation of (experimental) commit-graph files have so far been
fairly silent, even though it takes noticeable amount of time in a
meaningfully large repository. The users will now see progress
output.
* ab/commit-graph-progress:
gc: fix regression in 7b0f229222 impacting --quiet
commit-graph verify: add progress output
commit-graph write: add progress output
While writing a commit-graph file, we store the full list of
commits in a flat list. We use this list for sorting and ensuring
we are closed under reachability.
The initial allocation assumed that (at most) one in four objects
is a commit. This is a dramatic over-count for many repos,
especially large ones. Since we grow the repo dynamically, reduce
this count by a factor of eight. We still set it to a minimum of
1024 before allocating.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
