As a follow-up to d162b25f95 (tests: remove support for
GIT_TEST_GETTEXT_POISON, 2021-01-20) remove most uses of test_i18ncmp
via a simple s/test_i18ncmp/test_cmp/g search-replacement.
I'm leaving t6300-for-each-ref.sh out due to a conflict with in-flight
changes between "master" and "seen", as well as the prerequisite
itself due to other changes between "master" and "next/seen" which add
new test_i18ncmp uses.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Carefully excluding t7064, which sees independent development elsewhere
at the time of writing, we use `main` as the default branch name in
t7[0-4]*. This trick was performed via
$ (cd t &&
sed -i -e 's/master/main/g' -e 's/MASTER/MAIN/g' \
-e 's/Master/Main/g' -- t7[0-4]*.sh &&
git checkout HEAD -- t7064\*)
This allows us to define `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main`
for those tests.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In addition to the manual adjustment to let the `linux-gcc` CI job run
the test suite with `master` and then with `main`, this patch makes sure
that GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME is set in all test scripts
that currently rely on the initial branch name being `master by default.
To determine which test scripts to mark up, the first step was to
force-set the default branch name to `master` in
- all test scripts that contain the keyword `master`,
- t4211, which expects `t/t4211/history.export` with a hard-coded ref to
initialize the default branch,
- t5560 because it sources `t/t556x_common` which uses `master`,
- t8002 and t8012 because both source `t/annotate-tests.sh` which also
uses `master`)
This trick was performed by this command:
$ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/\(test-lib\|lib-\(bash\|cvs\|git-svn\)\|gitweb-lib\)\.sh$/i\
GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\
export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\
' $(git grep -l master t/t[0-9]*.sh) \
t/t4211*.sh t/t5560*.sh t/t8002*.sh t/t8012*.sh
After that, careful, manual inspection revealed that some of the test
scripts containing the needle `master` do not actually rely on a
specific default branch name: either they mention `master` only in a
comment, or they initialize that branch specificially, or they do not
actually refer to the current default branch. Therefore, the
aforementioned modification was undone in those test scripts thusly:
$ git checkout HEAD -- \
t/t0027-auto-crlf.sh t/t0060-path-utils.sh \
t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh \
t/t1305-config-include.sh t/t1309-early-config.sh \
t/t1402-check-ref-format.sh t/t1450-fsck.sh \
t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh \
t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh \
t/t3040-subprojects-basic.sh t/t3301-notes.sh \
t/t3308-notes-merge.sh t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh \
t/t3436-rebase-more-options.sh \
t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh t/t4257-am-interactive.sh \
t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh t/t5401-update-hooks.sh \
t/t5511-refspec.sh t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh \
t/t5529-push-errors.sh t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh \
t/t5548-push-porcelain.sh \
t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh \
t/t5572-pull-submodule.sh t/t5608-clone-2gb.sh \
t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh \
t/t7508-status.sh t/t7606-merge-custom.sh \
t/t9302-fast-import-unpack-limit.sh
We excluded one set of test scripts in these commands, though: the range
of `git p4` tests. The reason? `git p4` stores the (foreign) remote
branch in the branch called `p4/master`, which is obviously not the
default branch. Manual analysis revealed that only five of these tests
actually require a specific default branch name to pass; They were
modified thusly:
$ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/lib-git-p4\.sh$/i\
GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\
export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\
' t/t980[0167]*.sh t/t9811*.sh
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git submodule foreach" did not protect command line options passed
to the command to be run in each submodule correctly, when the
"--recursive" option was in use.
* ms/submodule-foreach-fix:
submodule foreach: fix recursion of options
Calling
git submodule foreach --recursive <subcommand> --<option>
leads to an error stating that the option --<option> is unknown to
submodule--helper. That is of course only, when <option> is not a valid
option for git submodule foreach.
The reason for this is, that above call is internally translated into a
call to submodule--helper:
git submodule--helper foreach --recursive \
-- <subcommand> --<option>
This call starts by executing the subcommand with its option inside the
first level submodule and continues by calling the next iteration of
the submodule foreach call
git --super-prefix <submodulepath> submodule--helper \
foreach --recursive <subcommand> --<option>
inside the first level submodule. Note that the double dash in front of
the subcommand is missing.
This problem starts to arise only recently, as the
PARSE_OPT_KEEP_UNKNOWN flag for the argument parsing of git submodule
foreach was removed in commit a282f5a906. Hence, the unknown option is
complained about now, as the argument parsing is not properly ended by
the double dash.
This commit fixes the problem by adding the double dash in front of the
subcommand during the recursion.
Signed-off-by: Morian Sonnet <moriansonnet@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Robin reported that
git submodule foreach --quiet git pull --quiet origin
is not really quiet anymore [1]. "git pull" behaves as if --quiet is not
given.
This happens because parseopt in submodule--helper will try to parse
both --quiet options as if they are foreach's options, not git-pull's.
The parsed options are removed from the command line. So when we do
pull later, we execute just this
git pull origin
When calling submodule helper, adding "--" in front of "git pull" will
stop parseopt for parsing options that do not really belong to
submodule--helper foreach.
PARSE_OPT_KEEP_UNKNOWN is removed as a safety measure. parseopt should
never see unknown options or something has gone wrong. There are also
a couple usage string update while I'm looking at them.
While at it, I also add "--" to other subcommands that pass "$@" to
submodule--helper. "$@" in these cases are paths and less likely to be
--something-like-this. But the point still stands, git-submodule has
parsed and classified what are options, what are paths. submodule--helper
should never consider paths passed by git-submodule to be options even
if they look like one.
The test case is also contributed by Robin.
[1] it should be quiet before fc1b9243cd (submodule: port submodule
subcommand 'foreach' from shell to C, 2018-05-10) because parseopt
can't accidentally eat options then.
Reported-by: Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org>
Tested-by: Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It was observed that the variable '$displaypath' was accessible but
undocumented. Hence, document it.
Discussed-with: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Prathamesh Chavan <pc44800@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When running 'git submodule foreach --recursive' from a subdirectory of
your repository, nested submodules get a bogus value for $path:
For a submodule 'sub' that contains a nested submodule 'nested',
running 'git -C dir submodule foreach echo $path' from the root of the
superproject would report path='../nested' for the nested submodule.
The first part '../' is derived from the logic computing the relative
path from $pwd to the root of the superproject. The second part is the
submodule path inside the submodule. This value is of little use and is
hard to document.
Also, in git-submodule.txt, $path is documented to be the "name of the
submodule directory relative to the superproject", but "the
superproject" is ambiguous.
To resolve both these issues, we could:
(a) Change "the superproject" to "its immediate superproject", so
$path would be "nested" instead of "../nested".
(b) Change "the superproject" to "the superproject the original
command was run from", so $path would be "sub/nested" instead of
"../nested".
(c) Change "the superproject" to "the directory the original command
was run from", so $path would be "../sub/nested" instead of
"../nested".
The behavior for (c) was attempted to be introduced in 091a6eb0fe
(submodule: drop the top-level requirement, 2013-06-16) with the intent
for $path to be relative from $pwd to the submodule worktree, but that
did not work for nested submodules, as the intermittent submodules
were not included in the path.
If we were to fix the meaning of the $path using (a), we would break
any existing submodule user that runs foreach from non-root of the
superproject as the non-nested submodule '../sub' would change its
path to 'sub'.
If we were to fix the meaning of $path using (b), then we would break
any user that uses nested submodules (even from the root directory)
as the 'nested' would become 'sub/nested'.
If we were to fix the meaning of $path using (c), then we would break
the same users as in (b) as 'nested' would become 'sub/nested' from
the root directory of the superproject.
All groups can be found in the wild. The author has no data if one group
outweighs the other by large margin, and offending each one seems equally
bad at first. However in the authors imagination it is better to go with
(a) as running from a sub directory sounds like it is carried out by a
human rather than by some automation task. With a human on the keyboard
the feedback loop is short and the changed behavior can be adapted to
quickly unlike some automation that can break silently.
Discussed-with: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
Signed-off-by: Prathamesh Chavan <pc44800@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Not everyone (including me) grasps the sed expression in a split second as
they would grasp the 4 lines printed as is.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The new test which is a replica of the previous test except
that it executes from a sub directory. Prior to this patch
the test failed by having too many '../' prefixed:
--- expect 2016-03-29 19:02:33.087336115 +0000
+++ actual 2016-03-29 19:02:33.359343311 +0000
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
b23f134787d96fae589a6b76da41f4db112fc8db ../nested1 (heads/master)
-+25d56d1ddfb35c3e91ff7d8f12331c2e53147dcc ../nested1/nested2 (file2)
- 5ec83512b76a0b8170b899f8e643913c3e9b72d9 ../nested1/nested2/nested3 (heads/master)
- 509f622a4f36a3e472affcf28fa959174f3dd5b5 ../nested1/nested2/nested3/submodule (heads/master)
++25d56d1ddfb35c3e91ff7d8f12331c2e53147dcc ../../nested1/nested2 (file2)
+ 5ec83512b76a0b8170b899f8e643913c3e9b72d9 ../../../nested1/nested2/nested3 (heads/master)
+ 509f622a4f36a3e472affcf28fa959174f3dd5b5 ../../../../nested1/nested2/nested3/submodule (heads/master)
0c90624ab7f1aaa301d3bb79f60dcfed1ec4897f ../sub1 (0c90624)
0c90624ab7f1aaa301d3bb79f60dcfed1ec4897f ../sub2 (0c90624)
509f622a4f36a3e472affcf28fa959174f3dd5b5 ../sub3 (heads/master)
The path code in question:
displaypath=$(relative_path "$prefix$sm_path")
prefix=$displaypath
if recursive:
eval cmd_status
That way we change `prefix` each iteration to contain another
'../', because of the the relative_path computation is done
on an already computed relative path.
We must call relative_path exactly once with `wt_prefix` non empty.
Further calls in recursive instances to to calculate the displaypath
already incorporate the correct prefix from before. Fix the issue by
clearing `wt_prefix` in recursive calls.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The `prefix` was put in front of the display path unconditionally.
This is wrong as any relative path computation would need to be at
the front, so include the prefix into the display path.
The new test replicates the previous test with the difference of executing
from a sub directory. By executing from a sub directory all we would
expect all displayed paths to be prefixed by '../'.
Prior to this patch the test would report
Entering 'nested1/nested2/../nested3'
instead of the expected
Entering '../nested1/nested2/nested3'
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A behavior change, but a worthwhile one: "git submodule foreach"
was treating its arguments as part of a single command to be
concatenated and passed to a shell, making writing buggy
scripts too easy.
This patch preserves the old "just pass it to the shell" behavior
when a single argument is passed to 'git submodule foreach' and
moves to a new "skip the shell and use the arguments passed
unmolested" behavior when more than one argument is passed.
The old behavior (always concatenating and passing to the shell)
was similar to the 'ssh' command, while the new behavior (switching
on the number of arguments) is what 'xterm -e' does.
May need more thought to make sure this change is advertised well
so that scripts that used multiple arguments but added their own
extra layer of quoting are not broken.
* ak/submodule-foreach-quoting:
submodule foreach: skip eval for more than one argument
'eval "$@"' creates an extra layer of shell interpretation, which is
probably not expected by a user who passes multiple arguments to git
submodule foreach:
$ git grep "'"
[searches for single quotes]
$ git submodule foreach git grep "'"
Entering '[submodule]'
/usr/lib/git-core/git-submodule: 1: eval: Syntax error: Unterminated quoted string
Stopping at '[submodule]'; script returned non-zero status.
To fix this, if the user passes more than one argument, execute "$@"
directly instead of passing it to eval.
Examples:
* Typical usage when adding an extra level of quoting is to pass a
single argument representing the entire command to be passed to the
shell. This doesn't change that.
* One can imagine someone feeding untrusted input as an argument:
git submodule foreach git grep "$variable"
That currently results in a nonobvious shell code injection
vulnerability. Executing the command named by the arguments
directly, as in this patch, fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
Acked-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
In t/t7407-submodule-foreach.sh there is a typo in one of the
path names given for a test step. The correct path is
nested1/nested2/.git, but nested1/nested1/nested2/.git is
given instead. The typo is hidden because this line also
accidentally omits the && chain operator. The omitted chain
also means the return values of all the previous commands in
this test are also being ignored.
Fix the path and add the chain operator so the entire test
sequence can be properly validated.
Signed-off-by: Phil Hord <hordp@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use the new rev-parse --prefix option to process all paths given to the
submodule command, dropping the requirement that it be run from the
top-level of the repository.
Since the interpretation of a relative submodule URL depends on whether
or not "remote.origin.url" is configured, explicitly block relative URLs
in "git submodule add" when not at the top level of the working tree.
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A test in t7404-submodule-foreach purports to test that
the --cached flag is properly noticed by --recursive calls
to the foreach command as it descends into nested
submodules. However, the test really does not perform this
test since the change it looks for is in a top-level
submodule handled by the first invocation of the command.
To properly test for the flag being passed to recursive
invocations, the change must be buried deeper in the
hierarchy.
Move the change one level deeper so it properly verifies
the recursive machinery of the 'git submodule status'
command.
Signed-off-by: Phil Hord <hordp@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Check if <path> is a valid git-dir or a valid git-file that points
to a valid git-dir.
We want tests to be independent from the fact that a git-dir may
be a git-file. Thus we changed tests to use this feature.
Signed-off-by: Fredrik Gustafsson <iveqy@iveqy.com>
Mentored-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Mentored-by: Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* bc/submodule-foreach-stdin-fix-1.7.4:
git-submodule.sh: preserve stdin for the command spawned by foreach
t/t7407: demonstrate that the command called by 'submodule foreach' loses stdin
Conflicts:
git-submodule.sh
The user-supplied command spawned by 'submodule foreach' loses its
connection to the original standard input. Instead, it is connected to the
output of a pipe within the git-submodule script. The user-supplied
command supplied to 'submodule foreach' is spawned within a while loop
which is being piped into. Due to the way shells implement piping output
to a while loop, a subshell is created with its standard input attached to
the output of the pipe. This results in all of the commands executed
within the while loop to have their stdins modified in the same way,
including the user-supplied command.
This can cause a problem if the command requires reading from stdin or if
it changes its behavior based on whether stdin is a tty or not. For
example, this problem was noticed when trying to execute the following:
git submodule foreach git shortlog --since=two.weeks.ago
which printed a message about entering the first submodule and produced no
further output and exited with a status of zero. In this case, shortlog
detected that it was not connected to a tty, and since no revision was
supplied as an argument, it attempted to read the list of revisions from
standard input. Instead, it slurped up the list of submodules that was
being piped to the enclosing while loop and caused that loop to end early
without processing the remaining submodules.
Work around this behavior by saving the original standard input file
descriptor before the while loop, and restoring it when spawning the
user-supplied command.
This fixes the tests in t7407.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The user-supplied command spawned by 'submodule foreach' loses its
connection to the original standard input. Instead, it is connected to the
output of a pipe within the git-submodule script. This can cause a problem
if the command requires reading from stdin or if it changes its behavior
based on whether stdin is a tty or not (e.g. git shortlog). Demonstrate
this flaw.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Gettextize the "Entering [...]" message. This is explicitly tested for
so we need to skip a portion of a test with test_i18ncmp.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Recursive invocations of submodule update/status preserve all arguments,
so executing
git submodule update --recursive -- foo
attempts to recursively update a submodule named "foo".
Naturally, this fails as one cannot have an infinitely-deep stack of
submodules each containing a submodule named "foo". The desired behavior
is instead to update foo and then recursively update all submodules
inside of foo.
This commit accomplishes that by only saving the flags for use in the
recursive invocation.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Ballard <kevin@sb.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Shell variables only hold strings, not lists of parameters,
so $orig_args after
orig_args="$@"
fails to remember where each parameter starts and ends, if
some include whitespace. So
git submodule update \
--reference='/var/lib/common objects.git' \
--recursive --init
becomes
git submodule update --reference=/var/lib/common \
objects.git --recursive --init
in the inner repositories. Use "git rev-parse --sq-quote" to
save parameters in quoted form ready for evaluation by the
shell, avoiding this problem.
Helped-By: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Ballard <kevin@sb.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a $toplevel variable accessible to `git submodule foreach`, it
contains the absolute path of the top level directory (where
.gitmodules is).
This makes it possible to e.g. read data in .gitmodules from within
foreach commands. I'm using this to configure the branch names I want
to track for each submodule:
git submodule foreach 'git checkout $(git config --file $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch) && git pull'
For a little history: This patch is borne out of my continuing fight
of trying to have Git track the branches of submodules, not just their
commits.
Obviously that's not how they work (they only track commits), but I'm
just interested in being able to do:
git submodule foreach 'git pull'
Of course that won't work because the submodule is in a disconnected
head, so I first have to connect it, but connect it *to what*.
For a while I was happy with this because as fate had it, it just so
happened to do what I meant:
git submodule foreach 'git checkout $(git describe --all --always) && git pull'
But then that broke down, if there's a tag and a branch the tag will
win out, and I can't git pull a branch:
$ git branch -a
* master
remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master
remotes/origin/master
$ git tag -l
release-0.0.6
$ git describe --always --all
release-0.0.6
So I figured that I might as well start tracking the branches I want
in .gitmodules itself:
[submodule "yaml-mode"]
path = yaml-mode
url = git://github.com/yoshiki/yaml-mode.git
branch = master
So now I can just do (as stated above):
git submodule foreach 'git checkout $(git config --file $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch) && git pull'
Maybe there's a less painful way to do *that* (I'd love to hear about
it). But regardless of that I think it's a good idea to be able to
know what the top-level is from git submodule foreach.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Many projects using submodules expect all submodules to be checked out
in order to build/work correctly. A common command sequence for
developers on such projects is:
git clone url/to/project
cd project
git submodule update --init (--recursive)
This patch introduces the --recursive option to git-clone. The new
option causes git-clone to recursively clone and checkout all
submodules of the cloned project. Hence, the above command sequence
can be reduced to:
git clone --recursive url/to/project
--recursive is ignored if no checkout is done by the git-clone.
The patch also includes documentation and a selftest.
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The substring expansion notation is a bashism that we have not so far
adopted. Use 'git rev-parse --short' instead, as this also handles
the case where the unique abbreviation is longer than 7 characters.
Also fix the typo; the object name for submodule #2 was copied from
submodule #1's by mistake.
Suggested-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In very large and hierarchically structured projects, one may encounter
nested submodules. In these situations, it is valuable to not only show
status for all the submodules in the current repo (which is what is
currently done by 'git submodule status'), but also to show status for
all submodules at all levels (i.e. recursing into nested submodules as
well).
This patch teaches the new --recursive option to the 'git submodule status'
command. The patch also includes documentation and selftests.
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In very large and hierarchically structured projects, one may encounter
nested submodules. In these situations, it is valuable to not only update
the submodules in the current repo (which is what is currently done by
'git submodule update'), but also to operate on all submodules at all
levels (i.e. recursing into nested submodules as well).
This patch teaches the new --recursive option to the 'git submodule update'
command. The patch also includes documentation and selftests.
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In very large and hierarchically structured projects, one may encounter
nested submodules. In these situations, it is valuable to not only operate
on all the submodules in the current repo (which is what is currently done
by 'git submodule foreach'), but also to operate on all submodules at all
levels (i.e. recursing into nested submodules as well).
This patch teaches the new --recursive option to the 'git submodule foreach'
command. The patch also includes documentation and selftests.
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add verification of the behaviour of '$name' to the git submodule
foreach selftest.
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The selftest verifies that:
- only checked out submodules are visited by 'git submodule foreach'
- the $path, and $sha1 variables are set correctly for each submodule
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
