- Added a space between 'containers' and 'this' in the opening paragraph
- comming -> coming
- 'looking our' -> 'looking at our'
Signed-off-by: Luke Mitchell <luke@lpmitchell.com>
CI runs are failing in special_testing_rootless:
mkdir /var/tmp/go/pkg: permission denied
Probable cause: #6822, which universally set GOPATH.
Solution: in rootless setup, chown -R GOPATH as well
as GOSRC (the latter was already being chowned).
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
Oops! Logs of podman-remote tests are unreadable, they have
multiple (useless) --remote options plus '--url /something/long'
that makes it impossible to read the actual command being run.
This commit strips off '--remote' entirely, and hides '--url'
and its arg in the only-on-mouse-hover '[options]' text.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
Mainly needed for buildah testing: the htpasswd command was removed from
the upstream registry container image. Making it available on the
host-side enables configuring details needed by the registry during
it's initial setup.
Signed-off-by: Chris Evich <cevich@redhat.com>
Fixes: #5212
...or at least I hope it does. The symptom seems to be that
INTEGRATION_ROOT is not being defined in some code flows.
This PR blindly implements a suggestion from Miloslav,
setting INTEGRATION_ROOT in one more place.
We won't actually know for a long time if this works or
not, because the test failure is a flake.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
Currently you can not apply an ApparmorProfile if you specify
--privileged. This patch will allow both to be specified
simultaniosly.
By default Apparmor should be disabled if the user
specifies --privileged, but if the user specifies --security apparmor:PROFILE,
with --privileged, we should do both.
Added e2e run_apparmor_test.go
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
--umask sets the umask inside the container
Defaults to 0022
Co-authored-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashley Cui <acui@redhat.com>
This was added with an earlier exec rework, and honestly is very
confusing. Podman is printing an error message, but the error had
nothing to do with Podman; it was the executable we ran inside
the container that errored, and per `podman run` convention we
should set the Podman exit code to the process's exit code and
print no error.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <mheon@redhat.com>
The error messages from the 'podman xxx --help' cross-check
test are unhelpful, and cause much wasted time when they trigger.
Solution: instead of using the built-in exit-status check
in run_podman, do an explicit check outside of run_podman.
This lets us die() with a custom, hopefully useful, message.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
People who use docker scripts with Podman see failures
if they use disable-content-trust flag. This flag already
existed for podman build, adding it to pull/push/create/run.
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
We no longer have to dance around the fact that the repo is named
"libpod" which simplifies the opening a bit. Also, refresh our
scope section and to-do section a bit.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@pm.me>
