mirror of
git://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git
synced 2024-10-31 11:26:10 +00:00
bdc48bd1e4
logged to a file.
223 lines
7 KiB
Text
223 lines
7 KiB
Text
cat > /dev/null <<EOF
|
|
The above line is necessary, leave it alone!!
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
DOING A HARDWARE TRACE IN WINE
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The primary reason to do this is to reverse engineer a hardware device
|
|
for which you don't have documentation, but can get to work under Wine.
|
|
|
|
This lot is aimed at parallel port devices, and in particular parallel port
|
|
scanners which are now so cheap they are virtually being given away. The
|
|
problem is that few manufactures will release any programming information which
|
|
prevents drivers being written for Sane, and the traditional technique of using
|
|
DOSemu to produce the traces does not work as the scanners invariably only have
|
|
drivers for Windows.
|
|
|
|
Please note that I have not been able to get my scanner working properly (a
|
|
UMAX Astra 600P), but a couple of people have reported success with at least
|
|
the Artec AS6e scanner. I am not in the process of developing any driver nor do
|
|
I intend to, so don't bug me about it. My time is now spent writting programs
|
|
to set things like battery save options under Linux on Toshiba laptops, ans as
|
|
such I don't have any spare time for writting a driver for a parallel port
|
|
scanner etc.
|
|
|
|
Presuming that you have compiled and installed wine the first thing to do is is
|
|
to enable direct hardware access to your parallel port. To do this edit
|
|
wine.conf (usually in /usr/local/etc) and in the ports section add the
|
|
following two lines
|
|
|
|
read=0x378,0x379,0x37a,0x37c,0x77a
|
|
write=0x378,x379,0x37a,0x37c,0x77a
|
|
|
|
This adds the necessary access required for SPP/PS2/EPP/ECP parallel port on
|
|
LPT1. You will need to adjust these number accordingly if your parallel port is
|
|
on LPT2 or LPT0.
|
|
|
|
When starting wine use the following command line, where XXXX is the program
|
|
you need to run in order to access your scanner, and YYYY is the file your
|
|
trace will be stored in:
|
|
|
|
wine -debugmsg +io XXXX 2> >(sed 's/^[^:]*:io:[^ ]* //' > YYYY)
|
|
|
|
You will need large amounts of hard disk space (read hundreds of megabytes if
|
|
you do a full page scan), and for reasonable performance a really fast
|
|
processor and lots of RAM.
|
|
|
|
You might well find the log compression program that David Campbell
|
|
<campbell@torque.net> wrote helpfull in reducing the size of the log files.
|
|
This can be obtained by the following command:
|
|
|
|
sh ioport-trace-hints
|
|
|
|
This should extract shrink.c (which is located at the end of this file. Compile
|
|
the log compression program by:
|
|
|
|
cc shrink.c -o shrink
|
|
|
|
Use the shrink program to reduce the physical size of the raw log as follows:
|
|
|
|
cat log | shrink > log2
|
|
|
|
The trace has the basic form of
|
|
|
|
XXXX > YY @ ZZZZ:ZZZZ
|
|
|
|
where XXXX is the port in hexidecimal being accessed, YY is the data written
|
|
(or read) from the port, and ZZZZ:ZZZZ is the address in memory of the
|
|
instruction that accessed the port. The direction of the arrow indicates
|
|
whether the data was written or read from the port.
|
|
|
|
> data was written to the port
|
|
< data was read from the port
|
|
|
|
|
|
My basic tip for interperating these logs is to pay close attention to the
|
|
addresses of the IO instructions. There grouping and sometimes proximity should
|
|
reveal the presence of subroutines in the driver. By studying the different
|
|
versions you should be able to work them out. For example consider the
|
|
following section of trace from my UMAX Astra 600P
|
|
|
|
0x378 > 55 @ 0297:01ec
|
|
0x37a > 05 @ 0297:01f5
|
|
0x379 < 8f @ 0297:01fa
|
|
0x37a > 04 @ 0297:0211
|
|
0x378 > aa @ 0297:01ec
|
|
0x37a > 05 @ 0297:01f5
|
|
0x379 < 8f @ 0297:01fa
|
|
0x37a > 04 @ 0297:0211
|
|
0x378 > 00 @ 0297:01ec
|
|
0x37a > 05 @ 0297:01f5
|
|
0x379 < 8f @ 0297:01fa
|
|
0x37a > 04 @ 0297:0211
|
|
0x378 > 00 @ 0297:01ec
|
|
0x37a > 05 @ 0297:01f5
|
|
0x379 < 8f @ 0297:01fa
|
|
0x37a > 04 @ 0297:0211
|
|
0x378 > 00 @ 0297:01ec
|
|
0x37a > 05 @ 0297:01f5
|
|
0x379 < 8f @ 0297:01fa
|
|
0x37a > 04 @ 0297:0211
|
|
0x378 > 00 @ 0297:01ec
|
|
0x37a > 05 @ 0297:01f5
|
|
0x379 < 8f @ 0297:01fa
|
|
0x37a > 04 @ 0297:0211
|
|
|
|
As you can see their is a repeating structure starting at address 0297:01ec
|
|
that consists of four io access on the parallel port. Looking at it the first
|
|
io access writes a changing byte to the data port the second always writes the
|
|
byte 0x05 to the control port, then a value which always seems to 0x8f is read
|
|
from the status port at which point a byte 0x04 is written to the control port.
|
|
By studying this and other sections of the trace we can write a C routine that
|
|
emulates this, shown below with some macros to make reading/writing on the
|
|
parallel port easier to read.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define r_dtr(x) inb(x)
|
|
#define r_str(x) inb(x+1)
|
|
#define r_ctr(x) inb(x+2)
|
|
#define w_dtr(x,y) outb(y, x)
|
|
#define w_str(x,y) outb(y, x+1)
|
|
#define w_ctr(x,y) outb(y, x+2)
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Seems to be sending a command byte to the scanner
|
|
*
|
|
*/
|
|
int udpp_put(int udpp_base, unsigned char command)
|
|
{
|
|
int loop,value;
|
|
|
|
w_dtr(udpp_base, command);
|
|
w_ctr(udpp_base, 0x05);
|
|
|
|
for (loop=0;loop<10;loop++)
|
|
if (((value=r_str(udpp_base)) & 0x80)!=0x00) {
|
|
w_ctr(udpp_base, 0x04);
|
|
return value & 0xf8;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return (value & 0xf8) | 0x01;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the UMAX Astra 600P only seven such routines exist (well 14 really, seven
|
|
for SPP and seven for EPP). Whether you choose to disassemble the driver at
|
|
this point to verify the routines is your own choice. If you do, the address
|
|
from the trace should help in locating them in the disassembly.
|
|
|
|
You will probably then find it useful to write a script/perl/C program to
|
|
analyse the logfile and decode them futher as this can reveal higher level
|
|
grouping of the low level routines. For example from the logs from my UMAX
|
|
Astra 600P when decoded futher reveal (this is a small snippet)
|
|
|
|
|
|
start:
|
|
put: 55 8f
|
|
put: aa 8f
|
|
put: 00 8f
|
|
put: 00 8f
|
|
put: 00 8f
|
|
put: c2 8f
|
|
wait: ff
|
|
get: af,87
|
|
wait: ff
|
|
get: af,87
|
|
end: cc
|
|
start:
|
|
put: 55 8f
|
|
put: aa 8f
|
|
put: 00 8f
|
|
put: 03 8f
|
|
put: 05 8f
|
|
put: 84 8f
|
|
wait: ff
|
|
|
|
From this it is easy to see that put routine is oftern gouped together in five
|
|
sucessive calls sending information to the scanner. Once these are understood
|
|
it should be possible to process the logs further to show the higher level
|
|
routines in an easy to see format. Once the higest level format that you
|
|
can derive from this process is understood, you then need to produce a
|
|
series of scans varying only one parameter between them, so you can
|
|
discover how to set the various parameters for the scanner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathan Buzzard
|
|
<jab@hex.prestel.co.uk>
|
|
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
The following is the shrink.c program.
|
|
EOF
|
|
cat > shrink.c <<EOF
|
|
#include <stdio.h>
|
|
#include <string.h>
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
main (void)
|
|
{
|
|
char buff[256], lastline[256];
|
|
int count;
|
|
|
|
count = 0;
|
|
lastline[0] = 0;
|
|
|
|
while (!feof (stdin))
|
|
{
|
|
fgets (buff, sizeof (buff), stdin);
|
|
if (strcmp (buff, lastline) == 0)
|
|
{
|
|
count++;
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
if (count > 1)
|
|
fprintf (stdout, "# Last line repeated %i times #\n", count);
|
|
fprintf (stdout, "%s", buff);
|
|
strcpy (lastline, buff);
|
|
count = 1;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
EOF
|