system/wine
system/wine
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of git://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git synced 2024-11-05 18:01:34 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

ntdll/tests: Add tests for (Rtl)IsTextUnicode to verify that IS_TEXT_UNICODE_CONTROLS and IS_TEXT_UNICODE_REVERSE_CONTROLS are not mutually exclusive.

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Zac Brown 2008-06-24 09:57:11 -07:00 committed by Alexandre Julliard
parent 1aff73455d
commit e24e7e7852
1 changed files with 78 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

78
dlls/ntdll/tests/rtlstr.c
View file

@ -1678,7 +1678,11 @@ static void test_RtlIsTextUnicode(void)
{
char ascii[] = "A simple string";
WCHAR unicode[] = {'A',' ','U','n','i','c','o','d','e',' ','s','t','r','i','n','g',0};
WCHAR unicode_no_controls[] = {'A','U','n','i','c','o','d','e','s','t','r','i','n','g',0};
/* String with both byte-reversed and standard Unicode control characters. */
WCHAR mixed_controls[] = {'\t',0x9000,0x0d00,'\n',0};
WCHAR *be_unicode;
WCHAR *be_unicode_no_controls;
int flags;
int i;
@ -1721,7 +1725,81 @@ static void test_RtlIsTextUnicode(void)
todo_wine
ok(flags == (IS_TEXT_UNICODE_REVERSE_CONTROLS | IS_TEXT_UNICODE_REVERSE_SIGNATURE),
"Expected flags 0xc0, obtained %x\n", flags);
/* build byte reversed unicode string with no control chars */
be_unicode_no_controls = HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), 0, sizeof(unicode) + sizeof(WCHAR));
ok(be_unicode_no_controls != NULL, "Expeced HeapAlloc to succeed.\n");
be_unicode_no_controls[0] = 0xfffe;
for (i = 0; i < sizeof(unicode_no_controls)/sizeof(unicode_no_controls[0]); i++)
be_unicode_no_controls[i + 1] = (unicode_no_controls[i] >> 8) | ((unicode_no_controls[i] & 0xff) << 8);
/* The following tests verify that the tests for */
/* IS_TEXT_UNICODE_CONTROLS and IS_TEXT_UNICODE_REVERSE_CONTROLS */
/* are not mutually exclusive. Regardless of whether the strings */
/* contain an indication of endianness, the tests are still */
/* run if the flag is passed to (Rtl)IsTextUnicode. */
/* Test IS_TEXT_UNICODE_CONTROLS flag */
flags = IS_TEXT_UNICODE_CONTROLS;
ok(!pRtlIsTextUnicode(unicode_no_controls, sizeof(unicode_no_controls), &flags), "Test should not pass on Unicode string lacking control characters.\n");
ok(flags == 0, "Expected flags 0x0, obtained %x\n", flags);
flags = IS_TEXT_UNICODE_CONTROLS;
ok(!pRtlIsTextUnicode(be_unicode_no_controls, sizeof(unicode_no_controls), &flags), "Test should not pass on byte-reversed Unicode string lacking control characters.\n");
ok(flags == 0, "Expected flags 0x0, obtained %x\n", flags);
flags = IS_TEXT_UNICODE_CONTROLS;
todo_wine
{
ok(pRtlIsTextUnicode(unicode, sizeof(unicode), &flags), "Test should pass on Unicode string lacking control characters.\n");
ok(flags == IS_TEXT_UNICODE_CONTROLS, "Expected flags 0x04, obtained %x\n", flags);
}
flags = IS_TEXT_UNICODE_CONTROLS;
ok(!pRtlIsTextUnicode(be_unicode_no_controls, sizeof(unicode_no_controls) + 2, &flags),
"Test should not pass with standard Unicode string.\n");
ok(flags == 0, "Expected flags 0x0, obtained %x\n", flags);
flags = IS_TEXT_UNICODE_CONTROLS;
todo_wine
{
ok(pRtlIsTextUnicode(mixed_controls, sizeof(mixed_controls), &flags), "Test should pass on a string containing control characters.\n");
ok(flags == IS_TEXT_UNICODE_CONTROLS, "Expected flags 0x04, obtained %x\n", flags);
}
/* Test IS_TEXT_UNICODE_REVERSE_CONTROLS flag */
flags = IS_TEXT_UNICODE_REVERSE_CONTROLS;
ok(!pRtlIsTextUnicode(be_unicode_no_controls, sizeof(unicode_no_controls), &flags), "Test should not pass on Unicode string lacking control characters.\n");
ok(flags == 0, "Expected flags 0x0, obtained %x\n", flags);
flags = IS_TEXT_UNICODE_REVERSE_CONTROLS;
ok(!pRtlIsTextUnicode(unicode_no_controls, sizeof(unicode_no_controls), &flags), "Test should not pass on Unicode string lacking control characters.\n");
ok(flags == 0, "Expected flags 0x0, obtained %x\n", flags);
flags = IS_TEXT_UNICODE_REVERSE_CONTROLS;
ok(!pRtlIsTextUnicode(unicode, sizeof(unicode), &flags), "Test should not pass on Unicode string lacking control characters.\n");
ok(flags == 0, "Expected flags 0x0, obtained %x\n", flags);
flags = IS_TEXT_UNICODE_REVERSE_CONTROLS;
ok(!pRtlIsTextUnicode(be_unicode, sizeof(unicode) + 2, &flags),
"Test should pass with byte-reversed Unicode string containing control characters.\n");
todo_wine
ok(flags == IS_TEXT_UNICODE_REVERSE_CONTROLS, "Expected flags 0x40, obtained %x\n", flags);
flags = IS_TEXT_UNICODE_REVERSE_CONTROLS;
ok(!pRtlIsTextUnicode(mixed_controls, sizeof(mixed_controls), &flags), "Test should pass on a string containing byte-reversed control characters.\n");
todo_wine
ok(flags == IS_TEXT_UNICODE_REVERSE_CONTROLS, "Expected flags 0x40, obtained %x\n", flags);
/* Test with flags for both byte-reverse and standard Unicode characters */
flags = IS_TEXT_UNICODE_CONTROLS | IS_TEXT_UNICODE_REVERSE_CONTROLS;
ok(!pRtlIsTextUnicode(mixed_controls, sizeof(mixed_controls), &flags), "Test should pass on string containing both byte-reversed and standard control characters.\n");
todo_wine
ok(flags == (IS_TEXT_UNICODE_CONTROLS | IS_TEXT_UNICODE_REVERSE_CONTROLS), "Expected flags 0x44, obtained %x\n", flags);
HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, be_unicode);
HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, be_unicode_no_controls);
}
static const WCHAR szGuid[] = { '{','0','1','0','2','0','3','0','4','-',