weston/protocol/weston-test.xml
Leandro Ribeiro 79491b41f5 tests: drop test suite screenshooter implementation and protocol extension
This is a follow-up of commit "tests: start to use Weston's
default screenshooter in the test suite".

As we've started to use Weston's default screenshooter
implementation and protocol extension in the test suite,
we don't need what we've created specifically for the test
suite anymore.

Drop test suite screenshooter implementation and protocol
extension.

Signed-off-by: Leandro Ribeiro <leandro.ribeiro@collabora.com>
2020-10-27 12:19:39 +00:00

129 lines
4.8 KiB
XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<protocol name="weston_test">
<copyright>
Copyright © 2012 Intel Corporation
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
Software.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER
DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
</copyright>
<interface name="weston_test" version="1">
<description summary="weston internal testing">
Internal testing facilities for the weston compositor.
It can't be stressed enough that these should never ever be used
outside of running weston's tests. The weston-test.so module should
never be installed.
These requests may allow clients to do very bad things.
</description>
<request name="move_surface">
<arg name="surface" type="object" interface="wl_surface"/>
<arg name="x" type="int"/>
<arg name="y" type="int"/>
</request>
<request name="move_pointer">
<arg name="tv_sec_hi" type="uint"/>
<arg name="tv_sec_lo" type="uint"/>
<arg name="tv_nsec" type="uint"/>
<arg name="x" type="int"/>
<arg name="y" type="int"/>
</request>
<request name="send_button">
<arg name="tv_sec_hi" type="uint"/>
<arg name="tv_sec_lo" type="uint"/>
<arg name="tv_nsec" type="uint"/>
<arg name="button" type="int"/>
<arg name="state" type="uint"/>
</request>
<request name="send_axis">
<arg name="tv_sec_hi" type="uint"/>
<arg name="tv_sec_lo" type="uint"/>
<arg name="tv_nsec" type="uint"/>
<arg name="axis" type="uint"/>
<arg name="value" type="fixed"/>
</request>
<request name="activate_surface">
<arg name="surface" type="object" interface="wl_surface" allow-null="true"/>
</request>
<request name="send_key">
<arg name="tv_sec_hi" type="uint"/>
<arg name="tv_sec_lo" type="uint"/>
<arg name="tv_nsec" type="uint"/>
<arg name="key" type="uint"/>
<arg name="state" type="uint"/>
</request>
<request name="device_release">
<arg name="device" type="string"/>
</request>
<request name="device_add">
<arg name="device" type="string"/>
</request>
<event name="pointer_position">
<arg name="x" type="fixed"/>
<arg name="y" type="fixed"/>
</event>
<request name="send_touch">
<arg name="tv_sec_hi" type="uint"/>
<arg name="tv_sec_lo" type="uint"/>
<arg name="tv_nsec" type="uint"/>
<arg name="touch_id" type="int"/>
<arg name="x" type="fixed"/>
<arg name="y" type="fixed"/>
<arg name="touch_type" type="uint"/>
</request>
</interface>
<interface name="weston_test_runner" version="1">
<description summary="weston internal testing">
This is a global singleton interface for Weston internal tests.
This interface allows a test client to trigger compositor-side
test procedures. This is useful for cases, where the actual tests
are in compositor plugins, but they also require the presence of
a particular client.
This interface is implemented by the compositor plugins containing
the testing code.
A test client starts a test with the "run" request. It must not send
another "run" request until receiving the "finished" event. If the
compositor-side test succeeds, the "finished" event is sent. If the
compositor-side test fails, the compositor should send the protocol
error "test_failed", but it may also exit with an error (e.g. SEGV).
Unknown test name will raise "unknown_test" protocol error.
</description>
<enum name="error">
<entry name="test_failed" value="0" summary="compositor test failed"/>
<entry name="unknown_test" value="1" summary="unrecognized test name"/>
</enum>
<request name="destroy" type="destructor"/>
<request name="run">
<arg name="test_name" type="string"/>
</request>
<event name="finished"/>
</interface>
</protocol>