Fix 'implicit fallthrough' warning with new GCC

GCC 7 now warns on case statements falling through without an explicit
comment that falling through is OK. Insert some to make it happy.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <emilio.pozuelo@collabora.co.uk>
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Stone 2017-03-13 16:31:36 +00:00
parent 05df8c16ec
commit 2ef9b1a3c4
2 changed files with 11 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -345,12 +345,14 @@ get_output_work_area(struct desktop_shell *shell,
case WESTON_DESKTOP_SHELL_PANEL_POSITION_TOP:
default:
area->y += panel_height;
/* fallthrough */
case WESTON_DESKTOP_SHELL_PANEL_POSITION_BOTTOM:
area->width = output->width;
area->height = output->height - panel_height;
break;
case WESTON_DESKTOP_SHELL_PANEL_POSITION_LEFT:
area->x += panel_width;
/* fallthrough */
case WESTON_DESKTOP_SHELL_PANEL_POSITION_RIGHT:
area->width = output->width - panel_width;
area->height = output->height;

View file

@ -579,22 +579,31 @@ create_subsurface_tree(struct client *client, struct wl_surface **surfs,
case 11:
SUB_LINK(10, 2);
/* fallthrough */
case 10:
SUB_LINK(9, 2);
/* fallthrough */
case 9:
SUB_LINK(8, 6);
/* fallthrough */
case 8:
SUB_LINK(7, 6);
/* fallthrough */
case 7:
SUB_LINK(6, 2);
/* fallthrough */
case 6:
SUB_LINK(5, 1);
/* fallthrough */
case 5:
SUB_LINK(4, 3);
/* fallthrough */
case 4:
SUB_LINK(3, 1);
/* fallthrough */
case 3:
SUB_LINK(2, 0);
/* fallthrough */
case 2:
SUB_LINK(1, 0);