7 commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Mike Yuan	8d4fa6531b	man/run0: remove @ syntax for --machine= ... For run0 (as opposed to systemd-run in general), connecting to the system bus (of localhost or container) as a different user than root and then trying to elevate privilege from that makes little sense: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/32997#issuecomment-2127992973 The @ syntax is mostly useful when connecting to the user bus, which is not a use case for run0. Hence, let's remove the example. The syntax will be properly refused in #32999.	2024-05-27 09:40:47 +09:00
Mike Yuan	006c02b371	man/run0: remove -M alias for --machine= ... run0 doesn't know about the former.	2024-05-27 09:40:47 +09:00
Yu Watanabe	6fe998037a	man: fix typo ... Follow-up for 7df0297ac5.	2024-05-14 18:12:30 +09:00
Mike Yuan	18303adcd3	man/run0: remove the --user example for --machine= ... run0's --user= option is different from other tools, and the whole point of run0 is to connect to the system manager. So the example is spurious.	2024-05-08 10:08:53 +02:00
Thayne McCombs	7df0297ac5	man/run0: Describe environment variables set (#32622) ... * man/run0: Describe environment variables set	2024-05-04 12:06:16 +01:00
Mike Yuan	13e380b054	man/run0: fix typo (missing "by")	2024-05-01 14:43:32 +08:00
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek	7aed434371	Rename uid0 to run0 ... Naming is always a matter of preference, and the old name would certainly work, but I think the new one has the following advantages: - A verb is better than a noun. - The name more similar to "the competition", i.e. 'sudo', 'pkexec', 'runas', 'doas', which generally include an action verb. - The connection between 'systemd-run' and 'run0' is more obvious. There has been no release yet with the old name, so we can rename without caring for backwards compatibility.	2024-03-19 16:37:22 +01:00

Renamed from man/uid0.xml (Browse further)