This reverts commit ab6df52083.
The image build failed during kernel RPM installation (bug in %post
scriptlet). This has been fixed in the package suse-module-tools 16.0.13
[1]. The fix is in openSUSE Tumbleweed repos so the tests can be enabled
again.
[1] https://github.com/openSUSE/suse-module-tools/pull/53Fixes: #21019
It is now ran on the nightly CentOS build, so that it can cover
integration tests too, and not just unit tests. It's nightly as
it considerably increases the integration test runtime, so it's
not appropriate for all PRs.
ATTOW llvm-11 got into focal-updates, which conflicts with llvm-11
provided by the apt.llvm.org repositories. Let's use the system
llvm package if available in such cases to avoid that.
It seems some of the tests break network connectivity on the host,
as the code coverage upload fails to establish a connection.
Run them in a network namespace with 'unshare -n'.
\#20629 moved the mkosi configs to mkosi.default.d/ so we were building
for the host distro (Ubuntu) in each CI configuration. To fix it, we
write the distro we want to test to a mkosi.default file and mkosi
will apply the other necessary configs automatically from mkosi.default.d/<distro>
This commit also removes unnecessary CLI options that are already handled
by the config files.
The current pattern '#' triggers on the openSUSE kernel version that is
printed early during boot when no actual prompt is ready
> [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.12.10-1-default (geeko@buildhost) (gcc (SUSE Linux) 11.1.1 20210510 [revision 23855a176609fe8dda6abaf2b21846b4517966eb], GNU ld (GNU Binutils; openSUSE Tumbleweed) 2.36.1.20210326-4) #1 SMP Fri Jun 11 05:05:06 UTC 2021 (b92eaf7)
Instead wait for pattern that: a) should have fewer false positives, b)
still be with working on distro shells:
openSUSE (red color)
^[[1m^[[31mimage:~ #^[[m^O
arch
[root@image ~]#
debian
root@image:~#
ubuntu
root@image:~#
fedora
[root@image ~]#
The current boot test relies on terminal login, therefore network setup
inside image is unnecessary. This opens up possibility to test images
that don't support the network setup via veth devices.
We use the `autologin` mkosi option (see
mkosi.default.d/10-systemd.conf), so the pexpect root login throws
a (harmless) error:
```
Arch Linux (built from systemd tree)
Kernel 5.4.0-1047-azure on an x86_64 (console)
image login: root (automatic login)
root
root
[root@image ~]# systemctl poweroff
root
-bash: root: command not found
[root@image ~]# systemctl poweroff
```
Let's introduce a somewhat ugly workaround for #19442 and retry
the systemd-nspawn image boot test up to three times in case it dies
with the dissect timeout. Since this issue occurs only in the Arch job,
limit the workaround to this job only.
It seems there is another meson (0.57.0) regression preventing clang from
building systemd with --optimization=3 -Db_lto=true
By analogy with https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/pull/5199 let's just switch
to 0.56.2 for the time being
glibc 2.33-3 shipped on 2021-02-06 breaks running Arch containers on
systems with older kernels (like Ubuntu Focal). Until the issue is
resolved, let's pin the Arch repositories to glibc 2.32-5 to mitigate
the annoying CI fails.
See: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/69563
It happens too often that what people ask for already is implemented.
Let's help cut the noise a bit, and make people check things first
hopefully, and at least make it either for us to detect such cases.
Judging by https://launchpad.net/~upstream-systemd-ci/+archive/ubuntu/systemd-ci/+packages,
it got updated about 15 hours ago and the "build check" action has been
failing with
```
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
kbd : Depends: console-setup but it is not going to be installed or
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
console-setup-mini but it is not going to be installed
```
since then
Apart from running CIFuzz for each relevant PR, let's run it
unconditionally for each push to master to detect possible issues
(caused by ignored PRs, etc.).
Followup to 94f660a8fe.
The GitHub guide on contributing file says: "Decide whether to store your
contributing guidelines in your repository's root, docs, or .github directory."
https://help.github.com/articles/setting-guidelines-for-repository-contributors/#adding-a-contributing-file
But there's really no advantage to keeping it in the hidden .github/, since
these are public and really belong together with the other documentation.
We can still keep the issue templates under .github/, since they are not really
documentation on their own.
Updated the links pointing to CONTRIBUTING.md to refer to the one in docs/.
The docs/ directory is special in GitHub, since it can be used to serve GitHub
Pages from, so there's a benefit to switching to it in order to expose it
directly as a website.
Updated references to it from the documentations themselves, from the
CONTRIBUTING.md file and from Meson build files.
Github now has issue templates in the web interface, and allows
more than one to be specified. Let's split our single template
in two: bug report and RFE.
I figure sooneror later we'll have more of these docs, hence let's give
them a clean place to be.
This leaves NEWS and README/README.md as well as the LICENSE texts in
the root directory of the project since that appears to be customary for
Free Software projects.
We *do* have the occasional security issue, where it would be nice to have
non-public disclosure and time to fix the issue before it's fully public. Our
github infrastracture does not make it easy to report vulnerabilities in
confidential manner, so let's leverage the distro mechanisms for that. I
think we're better off with this solution than leaving it up to individual
reporters to discover some mechanism on their own.
