system/systemd
system/systemd
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/systemd/systemd synced 2024-07-03 08:29:25 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
main
systemd/rules.d/64-btrfs.rules.in

18 lines
618 B
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Normal View History

udev: add btrfs support All "btrfs" file systems will be registered with the kernel when they show up. Incomplete multi-device volumes will set SYSTEMD_READY=0, to prevent access until the volume is complete and fully registered.
2012-09-16 21:31:11 +00:00
# do not edit this file, it will be overwritten on update
SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="btrfs_end"
ACTION=="remove", GOTO="btrfs_end"
ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}!="btrfs", GOTO="btrfs_end"
rules: skip btrfs check if devices are not ready in 64-btrfs.rules (#8304) If any devices are marked with 'SYSTEMD_READY=0' then we shouldn't run any btrfs check on them. Indeed there's no point in running "btrfs ready" on devices that already have SYSTEMD_READY=0 set. Most probably such devices are members of a higher layer aggregate device such as dm-multipath or software RAID. Doing IO on them wastes time at best, and may cause delays, timeouts, or even hangs at worst (think active-passive multipath or degraded RAID, for example). It was initially reported at: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=872929
2018-02-28 09:36:06 +00:00
ENV{SYSTEMD_READY}=="0", GOTO="btrfs_end"
udev: add btrfs support All "btrfs" file systems will be registered with the kernel when they show up. Incomplete multi-device volumes will set SYSTEMD_READY=0, to prevent access until the volume is complete and fully registered.
2012-09-16 21:31:11 +00:00
# let the kernel know about this btrfs filesystem, and check if it is complete
IMPORT{builtin}="btrfs ready $devnode"
# mark the device as not ready to be used by the system
ENV{ID_BTRFS_READY}=="0", ENV{SYSTEMD_READY}="0"
assemble multidevice btrfs volumes without external tools (#6607) assemble multidevice btrfs volumes without external tools This self-contained approach introduce very little overhead, unless someone has a large number of devices composing many btrfs volumes, in which case btrfs device scan would be faster. Still, having robust implementation is a nice to have alternative for btrfs-progs.
2017-09-07 07:58:12 +00:00
# reconsider pending devices in case when multidevice volume awaits
Drop split-usr and unmerged-usr support As previously announced, execute order 66: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2022-September/048352.html The meson options split-usr, rootlibdir and rootprefix become no-ops that print a warning if they are set to anything other than the default values. We can remove them in a future release.
2023-06-12 01:15:19 +00:00
ENV{ID_BTRFS_READY}=="1", RUN+="{{BINDIR}}/udevadm trigger -s block -p ID_BTRFS_READY=0"
assemble multidevice btrfs volumes without external tools (#6607) assemble multidevice btrfs volumes without external tools This self-contained approach introduce very little overhead, unless someone has a large number of devices composing many btrfs volumes, in which case btrfs device scan would be faster. Still, having robust implementation is a nice to have alternative for btrfs-progs.
2017-09-07 07:58:12 +00:00
udev: add btrfs support All "btrfs" file systems will be registered with the kernel when they show up. Incomplete multi-device volumes will set SYSTEMD_READY=0, to prevent access until the volume is complete and fully registered.
2012-09-16 21:31:11 +00:00
LABEL="btrfs_end"
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink