Always throws at the moment, because parse_temporal_month_day_string()
is basically a stub, and parse_iso_date_time() isn't functional either.
The spec issue has been resolved though, so I figured we might as well
get one small step further :^)
Same as Vector, ByteBuffer now also signals allocation failure by
returning an ENOMEM Error instead of a bool, allowing us to use the
TRY() and MUST() patterns.
Instead of signalling allocation failure with a bool return value
(false), we now use ErrorOr<void> and return ENOMEM as appropriate.
This allows us to use TRY() and MUST() with Vector. :^)
First off, this verifies that an initial value is always provided in
Properties.json for each property.
Second, it verifies that parsing that initial value succeeds.
This means that a call to `property_initial_value()` will always return
a valid StyleValue. :^)
It's a little verbose to repeat these in cases like the borders, but if
everything has an initial value, we can guarantee that
`property_initial_value()` will return something! :^)
- `align-items`: `normal` is the initial value in the CSS-ALIGN spec,
but `stretch` is in CSS-FLEXBOX. The FLEXBOX spec is the one we've
actually implemented elsewhere, and ALIGN adds new values with special
syntax, so it's not trivial to add it here.
- `border-spacing`: `0` is equivalent to `0px 0px` and we don't yet
parse the double-value syntax.
- `text-decoration-thickness`: Had the wrong value.
In particular, fstatvfs used to assume that a file that was earlier
opened using some path will forever be at that path. This is wrong, and
in the meantime new mounts and new filesystems could take up the
filename or directories, leading to a completely inaccurate result.
This commit improves the situation:
- All filesystem information is now always accurate.
- The mount flags *might* be erroneously zero, if the custody for the
open file is not available. I don't know when that might happen, but
it is definitely not the typical case.
This patch introduces table joins. It uses a pretty dumb algorithm-
starting with a singleton '__unity__' row consisting of a single boolean
value, a cartesian product of all tables in the 'FROM' clause is built.
This cartesian product is then filtered through the 'WHERE' clause,
again without any smarts just using brute force.
This patch required a bunch of busy work to allow for example the
ColumnNameExpression having to deal with multiple tables potentially
having columns with the same name.
Because SQL is the craptastic language that it is, sometimes expressions
need to know details about the calling statement. For example the tables
in the 'FROM' clause may be needed to determine which columns are
referenced in 'WHERE' expressions. So the current statement is added
to the ExecutionContext and a new 'execute' overload on Statement is
created which takes the Database and the Statement and builds an
ExecutionContaxt from those.
These are needed to distinguish columns from different tables with the
same column name in one and the same (joined) Tuple. Not quite happy
yet with this API; I think some sort of hierarchical structure would be
better but we'll burn that bridge when we get there :^)
These files contain the same SQL statements as the similarly named tests
in Tests/LibSQL/TestSqlStatementExecution.cpp test suite. They can be
fed to the sql utility to assist in troubleshooting failing tests.
This allows libraries and binaries to explicitly link against
`<library>.so.serenity`, which avoids some confusion if there are other
libraries with the same name, such as OpenSSL's `libcrypto`.
`object_name()` already returns the cleaned library name, and we
currently don't have any libraries with suffixes in /usr/lib, so we can
convert this to an `ends_with()` check.
We already asked the region about what its library name is, and we also
use that value when maybe constructing a path, so let's make the check
use that as well.
All the read-only methods of Bitmap simply defer to BitmapView. Let's
make this relationship official by using class inheritance. This might
even shave off a few instructions, although any sufficiently optimizing
compiler probably already optimized them away.
There's nothing really background-size-specific about this, but since
there is no `<size>` value type defined in the CSS spec at this time,
and background-size is the only user of it, I think this name makes more
sense. But I'm not 100% convinced.
...as opposed to storing StyleValues, which we have to later check are
IdentifierStyleValues, which store identifiers that we can convert to
Repeat values later. It's fewer allocations, and we can't end up with
invalid values by mistake. :^)
While right now this doesn't save much complexity, it will do once we
care about multiple background layers per node. Then, having a single
repeat value per layer will simplify things.
It also means we can remove the pseudo-property concept entirely! :^)
