Stefan Hajnoczi effd60c878 monitor: only run coroutine commands in qemu_aio_context ... monitor_qmp_dispatcher_co() runs in the iohandler AioContext that is not polled during nested event loops. The coroutine currently reschedules itself in the main loop's qemu_aio_context AioContext, which is polled during nested event loops. One known problem is that QMP device-add calls drain_call_rcu(), which temporarily drops the BQL, leading to all sorts of havoc like other vCPU threads re-entering device emulation code while another vCPU thread is waiting in device emulation code with aio_poll(). Paolo Bonzini suggested running non-coroutine QMP handlers in the iohandler AioContext. This avoids trouble with nested event loops. His original idea was to move coroutine rescheduling to monitor_qmp_dispatch(), but I resorted to moving it to qmp_dispatch() because we don't know if the QMP handler needs to run in coroutine context in monitor_qmp_dispatch(). monitor_qmp_dispatch() would have been nicer since it's associated with the monitor implementation and not as general as qmp_dispatch(), which is also used by qemu-ga. A number of qemu-iotests need updated .out files because the order of QMP events vs QMP responses has changed. Solves Issue #1933. Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org Fixes: 7bed89958b ("device_core: use drain_call_rcu in in qmp_device_add") Buglink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215192 Buglink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214985 Buglink: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-17369 Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20240118144823.1497953-4-stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Tested-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>		2024-01-26 11:16:58 +01:00
..
fds.c
hmp-cmds-target.c
hmp-cmds.c
hmp-target.c
hmp.c
meson.build
monitor-internal.h
monitor.c
qmp-cmds-control.c
qmp-cmds.c
qmp.c	monitor: only run coroutine commands in qemu_aio_context	2024-01-26 11:16:58 +01:00
trace-events
trace.h