mirror of
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu
synced 2024-11-05 20:35:44 +00:00
25d68ffb6b
All the example code are indented with four spaces except this one. Fix this by adding four spaces here. Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190304071631.27567-3-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
216 lines
7.1 KiB
Text
216 lines
7.1 KiB
Text
QEMU Coding Style
|
|
=================
|
|
|
|
Please use the script checkpatch.pl in the scripts directory to check
|
|
patches before submitting.
|
|
|
|
1. Whitespace
|
|
|
|
Of course, the most important aspect in any coding style is whitespace.
|
|
Crusty old coders who have trouble spotting the glasses on their noses
|
|
can tell the difference between a tab and eight spaces from a distance
|
|
of approximately fifteen parsecs. Many a flamewar has been fought and
|
|
lost on this issue.
|
|
|
|
QEMU indents are four spaces. Tabs are never used, except in Makefiles
|
|
where they have been irreversibly coded into the syntax.
|
|
Spaces of course are superior to tabs because:
|
|
|
|
- You have just one way to specify whitespace, not two. Ambiguity breeds
|
|
mistakes.
|
|
- The confusion surrounding 'use tabs to indent, spaces to justify' is gone.
|
|
- Tab indents push your code to the right, making your screen seriously
|
|
unbalanced.
|
|
- Tabs will be rendered incorrectly on editors who are misconfigured not
|
|
to use tab stops of eight positions.
|
|
- Tabs are rendered badly in patches, causing off-by-one errors in almost
|
|
every line.
|
|
- It is the QEMU coding style.
|
|
|
|
Do not leave whitespace dangling off the ends of lines.
|
|
|
|
1.1 Multiline Indent
|
|
|
|
There are several places where indent is necessary:
|
|
|
|
- if/else
|
|
- while/for
|
|
- function definition & call
|
|
|
|
When breaking up a long line to fit within line width, we need a proper indent
|
|
for the following lines.
|
|
|
|
In case of if/else, while/for, align the secondary lines just after the
|
|
opening parenthesis of the first.
|
|
|
|
For example:
|
|
|
|
if (a == 1 &&
|
|
b == 2) {
|
|
|
|
while (a == 1 &&
|
|
b == 2) {
|
|
|
|
In case of function, there are several variants:
|
|
|
|
* 4 spaces indent from the beginning
|
|
* align the secondary lines just after the opening parenthesis of the
|
|
first
|
|
|
|
For example:
|
|
|
|
do_something(x, y,
|
|
z);
|
|
|
|
do_something(x, y,
|
|
z);
|
|
|
|
do_something(x, do_another(y,
|
|
z));
|
|
|
|
2. Line width
|
|
|
|
Lines should be 80 characters; try not to make them longer.
|
|
|
|
Sometimes it is hard to do, especially when dealing with QEMU subsystems
|
|
that use long function or symbol names. Even in that case, do not make
|
|
lines much longer than 80 characters.
|
|
|
|
Rationale:
|
|
- Some people like to tile their 24" screens with a 6x4 matrix of 80x24
|
|
xterms and use vi in all of them. The best way to punish them is to
|
|
let them keep doing it.
|
|
- Code and especially patches is much more readable if limited to a sane
|
|
line length. Eighty is traditional.
|
|
- The four-space indentation makes the most common excuse ("But look
|
|
at all that white space on the left!") moot.
|
|
- It is the QEMU coding style.
|
|
|
|
3. Naming
|
|
|
|
Variables are lower_case_with_underscores; easy to type and read. Structured
|
|
type names are in CamelCase; harder to type but standing out. Enum type
|
|
names and function type names should also be in CamelCase. Scalar type
|
|
names are lower_case_with_underscores_ending_with_a_t, like the POSIX
|
|
uint64_t and family. Note that this last convention contradicts POSIX
|
|
and is therefore likely to be changed.
|
|
|
|
When wrapping standard library functions, use the prefix qemu_ to alert
|
|
readers that they are seeing a wrapped version; otherwise avoid this prefix.
|
|
|
|
4. Block structure
|
|
|
|
Every indented statement is braced; even if the block contains just one
|
|
statement. The opening brace is on the line that contains the control
|
|
flow statement that introduces the new block; the closing brace is on the
|
|
same line as the else keyword, or on a line by itself if there is no else
|
|
keyword. Example:
|
|
|
|
if (a == 5) {
|
|
printf("a was 5.\n");
|
|
} else if (a == 6) {
|
|
printf("a was 6.\n");
|
|
} else {
|
|
printf("a was something else entirely.\n");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Note that 'else if' is considered a single statement; otherwise a long if/
|
|
else if/else if/.../else sequence would need an indent for every else
|
|
statement.
|
|
|
|
An exception is the opening brace for a function; for reasons of tradition
|
|
and clarity it comes on a line by itself:
|
|
|
|
void a_function(void)
|
|
{
|
|
do_something();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Rationale: a consistent (except for functions...) bracing style reduces
|
|
ambiguity and avoids needless churn when lines are added or removed.
|
|
Furthermore, it is the QEMU coding style.
|
|
|
|
5. Declarations
|
|
|
|
Mixed declarations (interleaving statements and declarations within
|
|
blocks) are generally not allowed; declarations should be at the beginning
|
|
of blocks.
|
|
|
|
Every now and then, an exception is made for declarations inside a
|
|
#ifdef or #ifndef block: if the code looks nicer, such declarations can
|
|
be placed at the top of the block even if there are statements above.
|
|
On the other hand, however, it's often best to move that #ifdef/#ifndef
|
|
block to a separate function altogether.
|
|
|
|
6. Conditional statements
|
|
|
|
When comparing a variable for (in)equality with a constant, list the
|
|
constant on the right, as in:
|
|
|
|
if (a == 1) {
|
|
/* Reads like: "If a equals 1" */
|
|
do_something();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Rationale: Yoda conditions (as in 'if (1 == a)') are awkward to read.
|
|
Besides, good compilers already warn users when '==' is mis-typed as '=',
|
|
even when the constant is on the right.
|
|
|
|
7. Comment style
|
|
|
|
We use traditional C-style /* */ comments and avoid // comments.
|
|
|
|
Rationale: The // form is valid in C99, so this is purely a matter of
|
|
consistency of style. The checkpatch script will warn you about this.
|
|
|
|
Multiline comment blocks should have a row of stars on the left,
|
|
and the initial /* and terminating */ both on their own lines:
|
|
/*
|
|
* like
|
|
* this
|
|
*/
|
|
This is the same format required by the Linux kernel coding style.
|
|
|
|
(Some of the existing comments in the codebase use the GNU Coding
|
|
Standards form which does not have stars on the left, or other
|
|
variations; avoid these when writing new comments, but don't worry
|
|
about converting to the preferred form unless you're editing that
|
|
comment anyway.)
|
|
|
|
Rationale: Consistency, and ease of visually picking out a multiline
|
|
comment from the surrounding code.
|
|
|
|
8. trace-events style
|
|
|
|
8.1 0x prefix
|
|
|
|
In trace-events files, use a '0x' prefix to specify hex numbers, as in:
|
|
|
|
some_trace(unsigned x, uint64_t y) "x 0x%x y 0x" PRIx64
|
|
|
|
An exception is made for groups of numbers that are hexadecimal by
|
|
convention and separated by the symbols '.', '/', ':', or ' ' (such as
|
|
PCI bus id):
|
|
|
|
another_trace(int cssid, int ssid, int dev_num) "bus id: %x.%x.%04x"
|
|
|
|
However, you can use '0x' for such groups if you want. Anyway, be sure that
|
|
it is obvious that numbers are in hex, ex.:
|
|
|
|
data_dump(uint8_t c1, uint8_t c2, uint8_t c3) "bytes (in hex): %02x %02x %02x"
|
|
|
|
Rationale: hex numbers are hard to read in logs when there is no 0x prefix,
|
|
especially when (occasionally) the representation doesn't contain any letters
|
|
and especially in one line with other decimal numbers. Number groups are allowed
|
|
to not use '0x' because for some things notations like %x.%x.%x are used not
|
|
only in Qemu. Also dumping raw data bytes with '0x' is less readable.
|
|
|
|
8.2 '#' printf flag
|
|
|
|
Do not use printf flag '#', like '%#x'.
|
|
|
|
Rationale: there are two ways to add a '0x' prefix to printed number: '0x%...'
|
|
and '%#...'. For consistency the only one way should be used. Arguments for
|
|
'0x%' are:
|
|
- it is more popular
|
|
- '%#' omits the 0x for the value 0 which makes output inconsistent
|