Both s390_features[S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_AES_256].name and
s390_features[S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_EAES_256].name is
"pcc-cmac-eaes-256". The former is obviously a pasto.
Impact:
* s390_feat_bitmap_to_ascii() misidentifies S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_AES_256
as "pcc-cmac-eaes-256". Affects QMP commands query-cpu-definitions,
query-cpu-model-expansion, query-cpu-model-baseline,
query-cpu-model-comparison, and the error message when
s390_realize_cpu_model() fails in check_compatibility().
* s390_cpu_list() also misidentifies it. Affects -cpu help.
* s390_cpu_model_register_props() creates CPU property
"pcc-cmac-eaes-256" twice. The second one fails, but the error is
ignored (a later commit will change that). Results in a single
property "pcc-cmac-eaes-256" with the description for
S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_AES_256, and no property for
S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_EAES_256. CPU properties are visible in CLI -cpu
and -device, QMP & HMP device_add, QMP device-list-properties, and
QOM introspection.
The two features are almost always used via their group msa4. Such
use is not affected by this bug.
Fix by deleting the wayward 'e'.
Fixes: 7824174462 ("s390x/cpumodel: introduce CPU features")
Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20200505152926.18877-10-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
[Lost paragraph in commit message restored, Fixes: tweaked]
The unpack facility provides the means to setup a protected guest. A
protected guest cannot be introspected by the hypervisor or any
user/administrator of the machine it is running on.
Protected guests are encrypted at rest and need a special boot
mechanism via diag308 subcode 8 and 10.
Code 8 sets the PV specific IPLB which is retained separately from
those set via code 5.
Code 10 is used to unpack the VM into protected memory, verify its
integrity and start it.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Co-developed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> [Changes
to machine]
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200323083606.24520-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
[CH: fixed up KVM_PV_VM_ -> KVM_PV_]
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
The internal macro name VECTOR_BCD_ENH does not match the actual
description. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20190715142304.215018-4-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
[CH: vxp->vxpdeh, as discussed]
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
David suggested to keep everything in sync as 4.1 is not yet released.
This patch fixes the name "vxbeh" into "vxpdeh".
To simplify the backports this patch will not change VECTOR_BCD_ENH as
this is just an internal name. That will be done by an extra patch that
does not need to be backported.
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Fixes: d05be57ddc ("s390: cpumodel: fix description for the new vector facility")
Fixes: 54d65de0b5 ("s390x/cpumodel: vector enhancements")
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20190715142304.215018-3-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
[CH: vxp->vxpdeh, as discussed]
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
The new facility is called "Vector-Packed-Decimal-Enhancement Facility"
and not "Vector BCD enhancements facility 1". As the shortname might
have already found its way into some backports, let's keep vxbeh.
Fixes: 54d65de0b5 ("s390x/cpumodel: vector enhancements")
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20190708150931.93448-1-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Let's add support for the AP-Queue interruption facility to the CPU
model.
The S390_FEAT_AP_QUEUE_INTERRUPT_CONTROL, CPU facility indicates
whether the PQAP instruction with the AQIC command is available
to the guest.
This feature will be enabled only if the AP instructions are
available on the linux host and AQIC facility is installed on
the host.
This feature must be turned on from userspace to intercept AP
instructions on the KVM guest. The QEMU command line to turn
this feature on looks something like this:
qemu-system-s390x ... -cpu xxx,apqi=on ...
or
... -cpu host
Right now AP pass-through devices do not support migration,
which means that we do not have to take care of migrating
the interrupt data:
virsh migrate apguest --live qemu+ssh://root@target.lan/system
error: Requested operation is not valid: domain has assigned non-USB host devices
Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
[rebase to newest qemu and fixup description]
Message-Id: <20190705153249.12525-1-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Let's handle it just like for other crypto features.
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Let's define features at a single spot and make it less error prone to
define new features.
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
