coroutine-lock: make CoMutex thread-safe

This uses the lock-free mutex described in the paper '"Blocking without
Locking", or LFTHREADS: A lock-free thread library' by Gidenstam and
Papatriantafilou.  The same technique is used in OSv, and in fact
the code is essentially a conversion to C of OSv's code.

[Added missing coroutine_fn in tests/test-aio-multithread.c.
--Stefan]

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20170213181244.16297-2-pbonzini@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Paolo Bonzini 2017-02-13 19:12:39 +01:00 committed by Stefan Hajnoczi
parent 91bcea4899
commit fed20a70e3
4 changed files with 247 additions and 14 deletions

View file

@ -160,10 +160,23 @@ bool qemu_co_queue_empty(CoQueue *queue);
/**
* Provides a mutex that can be used to synchronise coroutines
*/
struct CoWaitRecord;
typedef struct CoMutex {
bool locked;
/* Count of pending lockers; 0 for a free mutex, 1 for an
* uncontended mutex.
*/
unsigned locked;
/* A queue of waiters. Elements are added atomically in front of
* from_push. to_pop is only populated, and popped from, by whoever
* is in charge of the next wakeup. This can be an unlocker or,
* through the handoff protocol, a locker that is about to go to sleep.
*/
QSLIST_HEAD(, CoWaitRecord) from_push, to_pop;
unsigned handoff, sequence;
Coroutine *holder;
CoQueue queue;
} CoMutex;
/**

View file

@ -196,6 +196,88 @@ static void test_multi_co_schedule_10(void)
test_multi_co_schedule(10);
}
/* CoMutex thread-safety. */
static uint32_t atomic_counter;
static uint32_t running;
static uint32_t counter;
static CoMutex comutex;
static void coroutine_fn test_multi_co_mutex_entry(void *opaque)
{
while (!atomic_mb_read(&now_stopping)) {
qemu_co_mutex_lock(&comutex);
counter++;
qemu_co_mutex_unlock(&comutex);
/* Increase atomic_counter *after* releasing the mutex. Otherwise
* there is a chance (it happens about 1 in 3 runs) that the iothread
* exits before the coroutine is woken up, causing a spurious
* assertion failure.
*/
atomic_inc(&atomic_counter);
}
atomic_dec(&running);
}
static void test_multi_co_mutex(int threads, int seconds)
{
int i;
qemu_co_mutex_init(&comutex);
counter = 0;
atomic_counter = 0;
now_stopping = false;
create_aio_contexts();
assert(threads <= NUM_CONTEXTS);
running = threads;
for (i = 0; i < threads; i++) {
Coroutine *co1 = qemu_coroutine_create(test_multi_co_mutex_entry, NULL);
aio_co_schedule(ctx[i], co1);
}
g_usleep(seconds * 1000000);
atomic_mb_set(&now_stopping, true);
while (running > 0) {
g_usleep(100000);
}
join_aio_contexts();
g_test_message("%d iterations/second\n", counter / seconds);
g_assert_cmpint(counter, ==, atomic_counter);
}
/* Testing with NUM_CONTEXTS threads focuses on the queue. The mutex however
* is too contended (and the threads spend too much time in aio_poll)
* to actually stress the handoff protocol.
*/
static void test_multi_co_mutex_1(void)
{
test_multi_co_mutex(NUM_CONTEXTS, 1);
}
static void test_multi_co_mutex_10(void)
{
test_multi_co_mutex(NUM_CONTEXTS, 10);
}
/* Testing with fewer threads stresses the handoff protocol too. Still, the
* case where the locker _can_ pick up a handoff is very rare, happening
* about 10 times in 1 million, so increase the runtime a bit compared to
* other "quick" testcases that only run for 1 second.
*/
static void test_multi_co_mutex_2_3(void)
{
test_multi_co_mutex(2, 3);
}
static void test_multi_co_mutex_2_30(void)
{
test_multi_co_mutex(2, 30);
}
/* End of tests. */
int main(int argc, char **argv)
@ -206,8 +288,12 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
g_test_add_func("/aio/multi/lifecycle", test_lifecycle);
if (g_test_quick()) {
g_test_add_func("/aio/multi/schedule", test_multi_co_schedule_1);
g_test_add_func("/aio/multi/mutex/contended", test_multi_co_mutex_1);
g_test_add_func("/aio/multi/mutex/handoff", test_multi_co_mutex_2_3);
} else {
g_test_add_func("/aio/multi/schedule", test_multi_co_schedule_10);
g_test_add_func("/aio/multi/mutex/contended", test_multi_co_mutex_10);
g_test_add_func("/aio/multi/mutex/handoff", test_multi_co_mutex_2_30);
}
return g_test_run();
}

View file

@ -20,6 +20,10 @@
* LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
* OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
* THE SOFTWARE.
*
* The lock-free mutex implementation is based on OSv
* (core/lfmutex.cc, include/lockfree/mutex.hh).
* Copyright (C) 2013 Cloudius Systems, Ltd.
*/
#include "qemu/osdep.h"
@ -111,27 +115,119 @@ bool qemu_co_queue_empty(CoQueue *queue)
return QSIMPLEQ_FIRST(&queue->entries) == NULL;
}
/* The wait records are handled with a multiple-producer, single-consumer
* lock-free queue. There cannot be two concurrent pop_waiter() calls
* because pop_waiter() can only be called while mutex->handoff is zero.
* This can happen in three cases:
* - in qemu_co_mutex_unlock, before the hand-off protocol has started.
* In this case, qemu_co_mutex_lock will see mutex->handoff == 0 and
* not take part in the handoff.
* - in qemu_co_mutex_lock, if it steals the hand-off responsibility from
* qemu_co_mutex_unlock. In this case, qemu_co_mutex_unlock will fail
* the cmpxchg (it will see either 0 or the next sequence value) and
* exit. The next hand-off cannot begin until qemu_co_mutex_lock has
* woken up someone.
* - in qemu_co_mutex_unlock, if it takes the hand-off token itself.
* In this case another iteration starts with mutex->handoff == 0;
* a concurrent qemu_co_mutex_lock will fail the cmpxchg, and
* qemu_co_mutex_unlock will go back to case (1).
*
* The following functions manage this queue.
*/
typedef struct CoWaitRecord {
Coroutine *co;
QSLIST_ENTRY(CoWaitRecord) next;
} CoWaitRecord;
static void push_waiter(CoMutex *mutex, CoWaitRecord *w)
{
w->co = qemu_coroutine_self();
QSLIST_INSERT_HEAD_ATOMIC(&mutex->from_push, w, next);
}
static void move_waiters(CoMutex *mutex)
{
QSLIST_HEAD(, CoWaitRecord) reversed;
QSLIST_MOVE_ATOMIC(&reversed, &mutex->from_push);
while (!QSLIST_EMPTY(&reversed)) {
CoWaitRecord *w = QSLIST_FIRST(&reversed);
QSLIST_REMOVE_HEAD(&reversed, next);
QSLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&mutex->to_pop, w, next);
}
}
static CoWaitRecord *pop_waiter(CoMutex *mutex)
{
CoWaitRecord *w;
if (QSLIST_EMPTY(&mutex->to_pop)) {
move_waiters(mutex);
if (QSLIST_EMPTY(&mutex->to_pop)) {
return NULL;
}
}
w = QSLIST_FIRST(&mutex->to_pop);
QSLIST_REMOVE_HEAD(&mutex->to_pop, next);
return w;
}
static bool has_waiters(CoMutex *mutex)
{
return QSLIST_EMPTY(&mutex->to_pop) || QSLIST_EMPTY(&mutex->from_push);
}
void qemu_co_mutex_init(CoMutex *mutex)
{
memset(mutex, 0, sizeof(*mutex));
qemu_co_queue_init(&mutex->queue);
}
static void coroutine_fn qemu_co_mutex_lock_slowpath(CoMutex *mutex)
{
Coroutine *self = qemu_coroutine_self();
CoWaitRecord w;
unsigned old_handoff;
trace_qemu_co_mutex_lock_entry(mutex, self);
w.co = self;
push_waiter(mutex, &w);
/* This is the "Responsibility Hand-Off" protocol; a lock() picks from
* a concurrent unlock() the responsibility of waking somebody up.
*/
old_handoff = atomic_mb_read(&mutex->handoff);
if (old_handoff &&
has_waiters(mutex) &&
atomic_cmpxchg(&mutex->handoff, old_handoff, 0) == old_handoff) {
/* There can be no concurrent pops, because there can be only
* one active handoff at a time.
*/
CoWaitRecord *to_wake = pop_waiter(mutex);
Coroutine *co = to_wake->co;
if (co == self) {
/* We got the lock ourselves! */
assert(to_wake == &w);
return;
}
aio_co_wake(co);
}
qemu_coroutine_yield();
trace_qemu_co_mutex_lock_return(mutex, self);
}
void coroutine_fn qemu_co_mutex_lock(CoMutex *mutex)
{
Coroutine *self = qemu_coroutine_self();
trace_qemu_co_mutex_lock_entry(mutex, self);
while (mutex->locked) {
qemu_co_queue_wait(&mutex->queue);
if (atomic_fetch_inc(&mutex->locked) == 0) {
/* Uncontended. */
trace_qemu_co_mutex_lock_uncontended(mutex, self);
} else {
qemu_co_mutex_lock_slowpath(mutex);
}
mutex->locked = true;
mutex->holder = self;
self->locks_held++;
trace_qemu_co_mutex_lock_return(mutex, self);
}
void coroutine_fn qemu_co_mutex_unlock(CoMutex *mutex)
@ -140,14 +236,51 @@ void coroutine_fn qemu_co_mutex_unlock(CoMutex *mutex)
trace_qemu_co_mutex_unlock_entry(mutex, self);
assert(mutex->locked == true);
assert(mutex->locked);
assert(mutex->holder == self);
assert(qemu_in_coroutine());
mutex->locked = false;
mutex->holder = NULL;
self->locks_held--;
qemu_co_queue_next(&mutex->queue);
if (atomic_fetch_dec(&mutex->locked) == 1) {
/* No waiting qemu_co_mutex_lock(). Pfew, that was easy! */
return;
}
for (;;) {
CoWaitRecord *to_wake = pop_waiter(mutex);
unsigned our_handoff;
if (to_wake) {
Coroutine *co = to_wake->co;
aio_co_wake(co);
break;
}
/* Some concurrent lock() is in progress (we know this because
* mutex->locked was >1) but it hasn't yet put itself on the wait
* queue. Pick a sequence number for the handoff protocol (not 0).
*/
if (++mutex->sequence == 0) {
mutex->sequence = 1;
}
our_handoff = mutex->sequence;
atomic_mb_set(&mutex->handoff, our_handoff);
if (!has_waiters(mutex)) {
/* The concurrent lock has not added itself yet, so it
* will be able to pick our handoff.
*/
break;
}
/* Try to do the handoff protocol ourselves; if somebody else has
* already taken it, however, we're done and they're responsible.
*/
if (atomic_cmpxchg(&mutex->handoff, our_handoff, 0) != our_handoff) {
break;
}
}
trace_qemu_co_mutex_unlock_return(mutex, self);
}

View file

@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ qemu_coroutine_terminate(void *co) "self %p"
# util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c
qemu_co_queue_run_restart(void *co) "co %p"
qemu_co_mutex_lock_uncontended(void *mutex, void *self) "mutex %p self %p"
qemu_co_mutex_lock_entry(void *mutex, void *self) "mutex %p self %p"
qemu_co_mutex_lock_return(void *mutex, void *self) "mutex %p self %p"
qemu_co_mutex_unlock_entry(void *mutex, void *self) "mutex %p self %p"