hw/vfio/ap: Fix missing ERRP_GUARD() for error_prepend()

As the comment in qapi/error, passing @errp to error_prepend() requires
ERRP_GUARD():

* = Why, when and how to use ERRP_GUARD() =
*
* Without ERRP_GUARD(), use of the @errp parameter is restricted:
...
* - It should not be passed to error_prepend(), error_vprepend() or
*   error_append_hint(), because that doesn't work with &error_fatal.
* ERRP_GUARD() lifts these restrictions.
*
* To use ERRP_GUARD(), add it right at the beginning of the function.
* @errp can then be used without worrying about the argument being
* NULL or &error_fatal.

ERRP_GUARD() could avoid the case when @errp is &error_fatal, the user
can't see this additional information, because exit() happens in
error_setg earlier than information is added [1].

The vfio_ap_realize() passes @errp to error_prepend(), and as a
DeviceClass.realize method, there are too many possible callers to check
the impact of this defect; it may or may not be harmless. Thus it is
necessary to protect @errp with ERRP_GUARD().

To avoid the issue like [1] said, add missing ERRP_GUARD() at the
beginning of this function.

[1]: Issue description in the commit message of commit ae7c80a7bd
     ("error: New macro ERRP_GUARD()").

Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
Cc: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240311033822.3142585-19-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>

hw/vfio/ap.c

@@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ static void vfio_ap_unregister_irq_notifier(VFIOAPDevice *vapdev,
 
 static void vfio_ap_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
 {
+    ERRP_GUARD();
     int ret;
     Error *err = NULL;
     VFIOAPDevice *vapdev = VFIO_AP_DEVICE(dev);