target/i386: fix ADOX followed by ADCX

When ADCX is followed by ADOX or vice versa, the second instruction's
carry comes from EFLAGS and the condition codes use the CC_OP_ADCOX
operation.  Retrieving the carry from EFLAGS is handled by this bit
of gen_ADCOX:

        tcg_gen_extract_tl(carry_in, cpu_cc_src,
            ctz32(cc_op == CC_OP_ADCX ? CC_C : CC_O), 1);

Unfortunately, in this case cc_op has been overwritten by the previous
"if" statement to CC_OP_ADCOX.  This works by chance when the first
instruction is ADCX; however, if the first instruction is ADOX,
ADCX will incorrectly take its carry from OF instead of CF.

Fix by moving the computation of the new cc_op at the end of the function.
The included exhaustive test case fails without this patch and passes
afterwards.

Because ADCX/ADOX need not be invoked through the VEX prefix, this
regression bisects to commit 16fc5726a6 ("target/i386: reimplement
0x0f 0x38, add AVX", 2022-10-18).  However, the mistake happened a
little earlier, when BMI instructions were rewritten using the new
decoder framework.

Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1471
Reported-by: Paul Jolly <https://gitlab.com/myitcv>
Fixes: 1d0b926150 ("target/i386: move scalar 0F 38 and 0F 3A instruction to new decoder", 2022-10-18)
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Paolo Bonzini 2023-01-31 09:48:03 +01:00
parent 99282098dc
commit 60c7dd22e1
3 changed files with 91 additions and 10 deletions

View file

@ -1015,6 +1015,7 @@ VSIB_AVX(VPGATHERQ, vpgatherq)
static void gen_ADCOX(DisasContext *s, CPUX86State *env, MemOp ot, int cc_op)
{
int opposite_cc_op;
TCGv carry_in = NULL;
TCGv carry_out = (cc_op == CC_OP_ADCX ? cpu_cc_dst : cpu_cc_src2);
TCGv zero;
@ -1022,14 +1023,8 @@ static void gen_ADCOX(DisasContext *s, CPUX86State *env, MemOp ot, int cc_op)
if (cc_op == s->cc_op || s->cc_op == CC_OP_ADCOX) {
/* Re-use the carry-out from a previous round. */
carry_in = carry_out;
cc_op = s->cc_op;
} else if (s->cc_op == CC_OP_ADCX || s->cc_op == CC_OP_ADOX) {
/* Merge with the carry-out from the opposite instruction. */
cc_op = CC_OP_ADCOX;
}
/* If we don't have a carry-in, get it out of EFLAGS. */
if (!carry_in) {
} else {
/* We don't have a carry-in, get it out of EFLAGS. */
if (s->cc_op != CC_OP_ADCX && s->cc_op != CC_OP_ADOX) {
gen_compute_eflags(s);
}
@ -1053,7 +1048,14 @@ static void gen_ADCOX(DisasContext *s, CPUX86State *env, MemOp ot, int cc_op)
tcg_gen_add2_tl(s->T0, carry_out, s->T0, carry_out, s->T1, zero);
break;
}
set_cc_op(s, cc_op);
opposite_cc_op = cc_op == CC_OP_ADCX ? CC_OP_ADOX : CC_OP_ADCX;
if (s->cc_op == CC_OP_ADCOX || s->cc_op == opposite_cc_op) {
/* Merge with the carry-out from the opposite instruction. */
set_cc_op(s, CC_OP_ADCOX);
} else {
set_cc_op(s, cc_op);
}
}
static void gen_ADCX(DisasContext *s, CPUX86State *env, X86DecodedInsn *decode)

View file

@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ config-cc.mak: Makefile
I386_SRCS=$(notdir $(wildcard $(I386_SRC)/*.c))
ALL_X86_TESTS=$(I386_SRCS:.c=)
SKIP_I386_TESTS=test-i386-ssse3 test-avx test-3dnow test-mmx
X86_64_TESTS:=$(filter test-i386-bmi2 $(SKIP_I386_TESTS), $(ALL_X86_TESTS))
X86_64_TESTS:=$(filter test-i386-adcox test-i386-bmi2 $(SKIP_I386_TESTS), $(ALL_X86_TESTS))
test-i386-sse-exceptions: CFLAGS += -msse4.1 -mfpmath=sse
run-test-i386-sse-exceptions: QEMU_OPTS += -cpu max
@ -28,6 +28,10 @@ test-i386-bmi2: CFLAGS=-O2
run-test-i386-bmi2: QEMU_OPTS += -cpu max
run-plugin-test-i386-bmi2-%: QEMU_OPTS += -cpu max
test-i386-adcox: CFLAGS=-O2
run-test-i386-adcox: QEMU_OPTS += -cpu max
run-plugin-test-i386-adcox-%: QEMU_OPTS += -cpu max
#
# hello-i386 is a barebones app
#

View file

@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
/* See if various BMI2 instructions give expected results */
#include <assert.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#define CC_C 1
#define CC_O (1 << 11)
#ifdef __x86_64__
#define REG uint64_t
#else
#define REG uint32_t
#endif
void test_adox_adcx(uint32_t in_c, uint32_t in_o, REG adcx_operand, REG adox_operand)
{
REG flags;
REG out_adcx, out_adox;
asm("pushf; pop %0" : "=r"(flags));
flags &= ~(CC_C | CC_O);
flags |= (in_c ? CC_C : 0);
flags |= (in_o ? CC_O : 0);
out_adcx = adcx_operand;
out_adox = adox_operand;
asm("push %0; popf;"
"adox %3, %2;"
"adcx %3, %1;"
"pushf; pop %0"
: "+r" (flags), "+r" (out_adcx), "+r" (out_adox)
: "r" ((REG)-1), "0" (flags), "1" (out_adcx), "2" (out_adox));
assert(out_adcx == in_c + adcx_operand - 1);
assert(out_adox == in_o + adox_operand - 1);
assert(!!(flags & CC_C) == (in_c || adcx_operand));
assert(!!(flags & CC_O) == (in_o || adox_operand));
}
void test_adcx_adox(uint32_t in_c, uint32_t in_o, REG adcx_operand, REG adox_operand)
{
REG flags;
REG out_adcx, out_adox;
asm("pushf; pop %0" : "=r"(flags));
flags &= ~(CC_C | CC_O);
flags |= (in_c ? CC_C : 0);
flags |= (in_o ? CC_O : 0);
out_adcx = adcx_operand;
out_adox = adox_operand;
asm("push %0; popf;"
"adcx %3, %1;"
"adox %3, %2;"
"pushf; pop %0"
: "+r" (flags), "+r" (out_adcx), "+r" (out_adox)
: "r" ((REG)-1), "0" (flags), "1" (out_adcx), "2" (out_adox));
assert(out_adcx == in_c + adcx_operand - 1);
assert(out_adox == in_o + adox_operand - 1);
assert(!!(flags & CC_C) == (in_c || adcx_operand));
assert(!!(flags & CC_O) == (in_o || adox_operand));
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
/* try all combinations of input CF, input OF, CF from op1+op2, OF from op2+op1 */
int i;
for (i = 0; i <= 15; i++) {
printf("%d\n", i);
test_adcx_adox(!!(i & 1), !!(i & 2), !!(i & 4), !!(i & 8));
test_adox_adcx(!!(i & 1), !!(i & 2), !!(i & 4), !!(i & 8));
}
return 0;
}