qemu/backends/hostmem-file.c

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

328 lines
9.8 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* QEMU Host Memory Backend for hugetlbfs
*
* Copyright (C) 2013-2014 Red Hat Inc
*
* Authors:
* Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
*
* This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later.
* See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
*/
#include "qemu/osdep.h"
2016-03-14 08:01:28 +00:00
#include "qapi/error.h"
#include "qemu/error-report.h"
#include "qemu/module.h"
#include "qemu/madvise.h"
#include "sysemu/hostmem.h"
#include "qom/object_interfaces.h"
#include "qom/object.h"
backends/hostmem-file: Add "rom" property to support VM templating with R/O files For now, "share=off,readonly=on" would always result in us opening the file R/O and mmap'ing the opened file MAP_PRIVATE R/O -- effectively turning it into ROM. Especially for VM templating, "share=off" is a common use case. However, that use case is impossible with files that lack write permissions, because "share=off,readonly=on" will not give us writable RAM. The sole user of ROM via memory-backend-file are R/O NVDIMMs, but as we have users (Kata Containers) that rely on the existing behavior -- malicious VMs should not be able to consume COW memory for R/O NVDIMMs -- we cannot change the semantics of "share=off,readonly=on" So let's add a new "rom" property with on/off/auto values. "auto" is the default and what most people will use: for historical reasons, to not change the old semantics, it defaults to the value of the "readonly" property. For VM templating, one can now use: -object memory-backend-file,share=off,readonly=on,rom=off,... But we'll disallow: -object memory-backend-file,share=on,readonly=on,rom=off,... because we would otherwise get an error when trying to mmap the R/O file shared and writable. An explicit error message is cleaner. We will also disallow for now: -object memory-backend-file,share=off,readonly=off,rom=on,... -object memory-backend-file,share=on,readonly=off,rom=on,... It's not harmful, but also not really required for now. Alternatives that were abandoned: * Make "unarmed=on" for the NVDIMM set the memory region container readonly. We would still see a change of ROM->RAM and possibly run into memslot limits with vhost-user. Further, there might be use cases for "unarmed=on" that should still allow writing to that memory (temporary files, system RAM, ...). * Add a new "readonly=on/off/auto" parameter for NVDIMMs. Similar issues as with "unarmed=on". * Make "readonly" consume "on/off/file" instead of being a 'bool' type. This would slightly changes the behavior of the "readonly" parameter: values like true/false (as accepted by a 'bool'type) would no longer be accepted. Message-ID: <20230906120503.359863-4-david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
2023-09-06 12:04:55 +00:00
#include "qapi/visitor.h"
#include "qapi/qapi-visit-common.h"
OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(HostMemoryBackendFile, MEMORY_BACKEND_FILE)
struct HostMemoryBackendFile {
HostMemoryBackend parent_obj;
char *mem_path;
uint64_t align;
uint64_t offset;
bool discard_data;
bool is_pmem;
bool readonly;
backends/hostmem-file: Add "rom" property to support VM templating with R/O files For now, "share=off,readonly=on" would always result in us opening the file R/O and mmap'ing the opened file MAP_PRIVATE R/O -- effectively turning it into ROM. Especially for VM templating, "share=off" is a common use case. However, that use case is impossible with files that lack write permissions, because "share=off,readonly=on" will not give us writable RAM. The sole user of ROM via memory-backend-file are R/O NVDIMMs, but as we have users (Kata Containers) that rely on the existing behavior -- malicious VMs should not be able to consume COW memory for R/O NVDIMMs -- we cannot change the semantics of "share=off,readonly=on" So let's add a new "rom" property with on/off/auto values. "auto" is the default and what most people will use: for historical reasons, to not change the old semantics, it defaults to the value of the "readonly" property. For VM templating, one can now use: -object memory-backend-file,share=off,readonly=on,rom=off,... But we'll disallow: -object memory-backend-file,share=on,readonly=on,rom=off,... because we would otherwise get an error when trying to mmap the R/O file shared and writable. An explicit error message is cleaner. We will also disallow for now: -object memory-backend-file,share=off,readonly=off,rom=on,... -object memory-backend-file,share=on,readonly=off,rom=on,... It's not harmful, but also not really required for now. Alternatives that were abandoned: * Make "unarmed=on" for the NVDIMM set the memory region container readonly. We would still see a change of ROM->RAM and possibly run into memslot limits with vhost-user. Further, there might be use cases for "unarmed=on" that should still allow writing to that memory (temporary files, system RAM, ...). * Add a new "readonly=on/off/auto" parameter for NVDIMMs. Similar issues as with "unarmed=on". * Make "readonly" consume "on/off/file" instead of being a 'bool' type. This would slightly changes the behavior of the "readonly" parameter: values like true/false (as accepted by a 'bool'type) would no longer be accepted. Message-ID: <20230906120503.359863-4-david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
2023-09-06 12:04:55 +00:00
OnOffAuto rom;
};
static bool
file_backend_memory_alloc(HostMemoryBackend *backend, Error **errp)
{
#ifndef CONFIG_POSIX
error_setg(errp, "backend '%s' not supported on this host",
object_get_typename(OBJECT(backend)));
return false;
#else
HostMemoryBackendFile *fb = MEMORY_BACKEND_FILE(backend);
g_autofree gchar *name = NULL;
uint32_t ram_flags;
if (!backend->size) {
error_setg(errp, "can't create backend with size 0");
return false;
}
if (!fb->mem_path) {
error_setg(errp, "mem-path property not set");
return false;
}
backends/hostmem-file: Add "rom" property to support VM templating with R/O files For now, "share=off,readonly=on" would always result in us opening the file R/O and mmap'ing the opened file MAP_PRIVATE R/O -- effectively turning it into ROM. Especially for VM templating, "share=off" is a common use case. However, that use case is impossible with files that lack write permissions, because "share=off,readonly=on" will not give us writable RAM. The sole user of ROM via memory-backend-file are R/O NVDIMMs, but as we have users (Kata Containers) that rely on the existing behavior -- malicious VMs should not be able to consume COW memory for R/O NVDIMMs -- we cannot change the semantics of "share=off,readonly=on" So let's add a new "rom" property with on/off/auto values. "auto" is the default and what most people will use: for historical reasons, to not change the old semantics, it defaults to the value of the "readonly" property. For VM templating, one can now use: -object memory-backend-file,share=off,readonly=on,rom=off,... But we'll disallow: -object memory-backend-file,share=on,readonly=on,rom=off,... because we would otherwise get an error when trying to mmap the R/O file shared and writable. An explicit error message is cleaner. We will also disallow for now: -object memory-backend-file,share=off,readonly=off,rom=on,... -object memory-backend-file,share=on,readonly=off,rom=on,... It's not harmful, but also not really required for now. Alternatives that were abandoned: * Make "unarmed=on" for the NVDIMM set the memory region container readonly. We would still see a change of ROM->RAM and possibly run into memslot limits with vhost-user. Further, there might be use cases for "unarmed=on" that should still allow writing to that memory (temporary files, system RAM, ...). * Add a new "readonly=on/off/auto" parameter for NVDIMMs. Similar issues as with "unarmed=on". * Make "readonly" consume "on/off/file" instead of being a 'bool' type. This would slightly changes the behavior of the "readonly" parameter: values like true/false (as accepted by a 'bool'type) would no longer be accepted. Message-ID: <20230906120503.359863-4-david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
2023-09-06 12:04:55 +00:00
switch (fb->rom) {
case ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO:
/* Traditionally, opening the file readonly always resulted in ROM. */
fb->rom = fb->readonly ? ON_OFF_AUTO_ON : ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF;
break;
case ON_OFF_AUTO_ON:
if (!fb->readonly) {
error_setg(errp, "property 'rom' = 'on' is not supported with"
" 'readonly' = 'off'");
return false;
backends/hostmem-file: Add "rom" property to support VM templating with R/O files For now, "share=off,readonly=on" would always result in us opening the file R/O and mmap'ing the opened file MAP_PRIVATE R/O -- effectively turning it into ROM. Especially for VM templating, "share=off" is a common use case. However, that use case is impossible with files that lack write permissions, because "share=off,readonly=on" will not give us writable RAM. The sole user of ROM via memory-backend-file are R/O NVDIMMs, but as we have users (Kata Containers) that rely on the existing behavior -- malicious VMs should not be able to consume COW memory for R/O NVDIMMs -- we cannot change the semantics of "share=off,readonly=on" So let's add a new "rom" property with on/off/auto values. "auto" is the default and what most people will use: for historical reasons, to not change the old semantics, it defaults to the value of the "readonly" property. For VM templating, one can now use: -object memory-backend-file,share=off,readonly=on,rom=off,... But we'll disallow: -object memory-backend-file,share=on,readonly=on,rom=off,... because we would otherwise get an error when trying to mmap the R/O file shared and writable. An explicit error message is cleaner. We will also disallow for now: -object memory-backend-file,share=off,readonly=off,rom=on,... -object memory-backend-file,share=on,readonly=off,rom=on,... It's not harmful, but also not really required for now. Alternatives that were abandoned: * Make "unarmed=on" for the NVDIMM set the memory region container readonly. We would still see a change of ROM->RAM and possibly run into memslot limits with vhost-user. Further, there might be use cases for "unarmed=on" that should still allow writing to that memory (temporary files, system RAM, ...). * Add a new "readonly=on/off/auto" parameter for NVDIMMs. Similar issues as with "unarmed=on". * Make "readonly" consume "on/off/file" instead of being a 'bool' type. This would slightly changes the behavior of the "readonly" parameter: values like true/false (as accepted by a 'bool'type) would no longer be accepted. Message-ID: <20230906120503.359863-4-david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
2023-09-06 12:04:55 +00:00
}
break;
case ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF:
if (fb->readonly && backend->share) {
error_setg(errp, "property 'rom' = 'off' is incompatible with"
" 'readonly' = 'on' and 'share' = 'on'");
return false;
backends/hostmem-file: Add "rom" property to support VM templating with R/O files For now, "share=off,readonly=on" would always result in us opening the file R/O and mmap'ing the opened file MAP_PRIVATE R/O -- effectively turning it into ROM. Especially for VM templating, "share=off" is a common use case. However, that use case is impossible with files that lack write permissions, because "share=off,readonly=on" will not give us writable RAM. The sole user of ROM via memory-backend-file are R/O NVDIMMs, but as we have users (Kata Containers) that rely on the existing behavior -- malicious VMs should not be able to consume COW memory for R/O NVDIMMs -- we cannot change the semantics of "share=off,readonly=on" So let's add a new "rom" property with on/off/auto values. "auto" is the default and what most people will use: for historical reasons, to not change the old semantics, it defaults to the value of the "readonly" property. For VM templating, one can now use: -object memory-backend-file,share=off,readonly=on,rom=off,... But we'll disallow: -object memory-backend-file,share=on,readonly=on,rom=off,... because we would otherwise get an error when trying to mmap the R/O file shared and writable. An explicit error message is cleaner. We will also disallow for now: -object memory-backend-file,share=off,readonly=off,rom=on,... -object memory-backend-file,share=on,readonly=off,rom=on,... It's not harmful, but also not really required for now. Alternatives that were abandoned: * Make "unarmed=on" for the NVDIMM set the memory region container readonly. We would still see a change of ROM->RAM and possibly run into memslot limits with vhost-user. Further, there might be use cases for "unarmed=on" that should still allow writing to that memory (temporary files, system RAM, ...). * Add a new "readonly=on/off/auto" parameter for NVDIMMs. Similar issues as with "unarmed=on". * Make "readonly" consume "on/off/file" instead of being a 'bool' type. This would slightly changes the behavior of the "readonly" parameter: values like true/false (as accepted by a 'bool'type) would no longer be accepted. Message-ID: <20230906120503.359863-4-david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
2023-09-06 12:04:55 +00:00
}
break;
default:
g_assert_not_reached();
backends/hostmem-file: Add "rom" property to support VM templating with R/O files For now, "share=off,readonly=on" would always result in us opening the file R/O and mmap'ing the opened file MAP_PRIVATE R/O -- effectively turning it into ROM. Especially for VM templating, "share=off" is a common use case. However, that use case is impossible with files that lack write permissions, because "share=off,readonly=on" will not give us writable RAM. The sole user of ROM via memory-backend-file are R/O NVDIMMs, but as we have users (Kata Containers) that rely on the existing behavior -- malicious VMs should not be able to consume COW memory for R/O NVDIMMs -- we cannot change the semantics of "share=off,readonly=on" So let's add a new "rom" property with on/off/auto values. "auto" is the default and what most people will use: for historical reasons, to not change the old semantics, it defaults to the value of the "readonly" property. For VM templating, one can now use: -object memory-backend-file,share=off,readonly=on,rom=off,... But we'll disallow: -object memory-backend-file,share=on,readonly=on,rom=off,... because we would otherwise get an error when trying to mmap the R/O file shared and writable. An explicit error message is cleaner. We will also disallow for now: -object memory-backend-file,share=off,readonly=off,rom=on,... -object memory-backend-file,share=on,readonly=off,rom=on,... It's not harmful, but also not really required for now. Alternatives that were abandoned: * Make "unarmed=on" for the NVDIMM set the memory region container readonly. We would still see a change of ROM->RAM and possibly run into memslot limits with vhost-user. Further, there might be use cases for "unarmed=on" that should still allow writing to that memory (temporary files, system RAM, ...). * Add a new "readonly=on/off/auto" parameter for NVDIMMs. Similar issues as with "unarmed=on". * Make "readonly" consume "on/off/file" instead of being a 'bool' type. This would slightly changes the behavior of the "readonly" parameter: values like true/false (as accepted by a 'bool'type) would no longer be accepted. Message-ID: <20230906120503.359863-4-david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
2023-09-06 12:04:55 +00:00
}
backend->aligned = true;
name = host_memory_backend_get_name(backend);
ram_flags = backend->share ? RAM_SHARED : 0;
backends/hostmem-file: Add "rom" property to support VM templating with R/O files For now, "share=off,readonly=on" would always result in us opening the file R/O and mmap'ing the opened file MAP_PRIVATE R/O -- effectively turning it into ROM. Especially for VM templating, "share=off" is a common use case. However, that use case is impossible with files that lack write permissions, because "share=off,readonly=on" will not give us writable RAM. The sole user of ROM via memory-backend-file are R/O NVDIMMs, but as we have users (Kata Containers) that rely on the existing behavior -- malicious VMs should not be able to consume COW memory for R/O NVDIMMs -- we cannot change the semantics of "share=off,readonly=on" So let's add a new "rom" property with on/off/auto values. "auto" is the default and what most people will use: for historical reasons, to not change the old semantics, it defaults to the value of the "readonly" property. For VM templating, one can now use: -object memory-backend-file,share=off,readonly=on,rom=off,... But we'll disallow: -object memory-backend-file,share=on,readonly=on,rom=off,... because we would otherwise get an error when trying to mmap the R/O file shared and writable. An explicit error message is cleaner. We will also disallow for now: -object memory-backend-file,share=off,readonly=off,rom=on,... -object memory-backend-file,share=on,readonly=off,rom=on,... It's not harmful, but also not really required for now. Alternatives that were abandoned: * Make "unarmed=on" for the NVDIMM set the memory region container readonly. We would still see a change of ROM->RAM and possibly run into memslot limits with vhost-user. Further, there might be use cases for "unarmed=on" that should still allow writing to that memory (temporary files, system RAM, ...). * Add a new "readonly=on/off/auto" parameter for NVDIMMs. Similar issues as with "unarmed=on". * Make "readonly" consume "on/off/file" instead of being a 'bool' type. This would slightly changes the behavior of the "readonly" parameter: values like true/false (as accepted by a 'bool'type) would no longer be accepted. Message-ID: <20230906120503.359863-4-david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
2023-09-06 12:04:55 +00:00
ram_flags |= fb->readonly ? RAM_READONLY_FD : 0;
ram_flags |= fb->rom == ON_OFF_AUTO_ON ? RAM_READONLY : 0;
ram_flags |= backend->reserve ? 0 : RAM_NORESERVE;
ram_flags |= backend->guest_memfd ? RAM_GUEST_MEMFD : 0;
ram_flags |= fb->is_pmem ? RAM_PMEM : 0;
ram_flags |= RAM_NAMED_FILE;
return memory_region_init_ram_from_file(&backend->mr, OBJECT(backend), name,
backend->size, fb->align, ram_flags,
fb->mem_path, fb->offset, errp);
#endif
}
static char *get_mem_path(Object *o, Error **errp)
{
HostMemoryBackendFile *fb = MEMORY_BACKEND_FILE(o);
return g_strdup(fb->mem_path);
}
static void set_mem_path(Object *o, const char *str, Error **errp)
{
HostMemoryBackend *backend = MEMORY_BACKEND(o);
HostMemoryBackendFile *fb = MEMORY_BACKEND_FILE(o);
if (host_memory_backend_mr_inited(backend)) {
error_setg(errp, "cannot change property 'mem-path' of %s",
object_get_typename(o));
return;
}
g_free(fb->mem_path);
fb->mem_path = g_strdup(str);
}
static bool file_memory_backend_get_discard_data(Object *o, Error **errp)
{
return MEMORY_BACKEND_FILE(o)->discard_data;
}
static void file_memory_backend_set_discard_data(Object *o, bool value,
Error **errp)
{
MEMORY_BACKEND_FILE(o)->discard_data = value;
}
static void file_memory_backend_get_align(Object *o, Visitor *v,
const char *name, void *opaque,
Error **errp)
{
HostMemoryBackendFile *fb = MEMORY_BACKEND_FILE(o);
uint64_t val = fb->align;
visit_type_size(v, name, &val, errp);
}
static void file_memory_backend_set_align(Object *o, Visitor *v,
const char *name, void *opaque,
Error **errp)
{
HostMemoryBackend *backend = MEMORY_BACKEND(o);
HostMemoryBackendFile *fb = MEMORY_BACKEND_FILE(o);
uint64_t val;
if (host_memory_backend_mr_inited(backend)) {
error_setg(errp, "cannot change property '%s' of %s", name,
object_get_typename(o));
return;
}
error: Eliminate error_propagate() with Coccinelle, part 1 When all we do with an Error we receive into a local variable is propagating to somewhere else, we can just as well receive it there right away. Convert if (!foo(..., &err)) { ... error_propagate(errp, err); ... return ... } to if (!foo(..., errp)) { ... ... return ... } where nothing else needs @err. Coccinelle script: @rule1 forall@ identifier fun, err, errp, lbl; expression list args, args2; binary operator op; constant c1, c2; symbol false; @@ if ( ( - fun(args, &err, args2) + fun(args, errp, args2) | - !fun(args, &err, args2) + !fun(args, errp, args2) | - fun(args, &err, args2) op c1 + fun(args, errp, args2) op c1 ) ) { ... when != err when != lbl: when strict - error_propagate(errp, err); ... when != err ( return; | return c2; | return false; ) } @rule2 forall@ identifier fun, err, errp, lbl; expression list args, args2; expression var; binary operator op; constant c1, c2; symbol false; @@ - var = fun(args, &err, args2); + var = fun(args, errp, args2); ... when != err if ( ( var | !var | var op c1 ) ) { ... when != err when != lbl: when strict - error_propagate(errp, err); ... when != err ( return; | return c2; | return false; | return var; ) } @depends on rule1 || rule2@ identifier err; @@ - Error *err = NULL; ... when != err Not exactly elegant, I'm afraid. The "when != lbl:" is necessary to avoid transforming if (fun(args, &err)) { goto out } ... out: error_propagate(errp, err); even though other paths to label out still need the error_propagate(). For an actual example, see sclp_realize(). Without the "when strict", Coccinelle transforms vfio_msix_setup(), incorrectly. I don't know what exactly "when strict" does, only that it helps here. The match of return is narrower than what I want, but I can't figure out how to express "return where the operand doesn't use @err". For an example where it's too narrow, see vfio_intx_enable(). Silently fails to convert hw/arm/armsse.c, because Coccinelle gets confused by ARMSSE being used both as typedef and function-like macro there. Converted manually. Line breaks tidied up manually. One nested declaration of @local_err deleted manually. Preexisting unwanted blank line dropped in hw/riscv/sifive_e.c. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20200707160613.848843-35-armbru@redhat.com>
2020-07-07 16:06:02 +00:00
if (!visit_type_size(v, name, &val, errp)) {
return;
}
fb->align = val;
}
static void file_memory_backend_get_offset(Object *o, Visitor *v,
const char *name, void *opaque,
Error **errp)
{
HostMemoryBackendFile *fb = MEMORY_BACKEND_FILE(o);
uint64_t val = fb->offset;
visit_type_size(v, name, &val, errp);
}
static void file_memory_backend_set_offset(Object *o, Visitor *v,
const char *name, void *opaque,
Error **errp)
{
HostMemoryBackend *backend = MEMORY_BACKEND(o);
HostMemoryBackendFile *fb = MEMORY_BACKEND_FILE(o);
uint64_t val;
if (host_memory_backend_mr_inited(backend)) {
error_setg(errp, "cannot change property '%s' of %s", name,
object_get_typename(o));
return;
}
if (!visit_type_size(v, name, &val, errp)) {
return;
}
fb->offset = val;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_LIBPMEM
static bool file_memory_backend_get_pmem(Object *o, Error **errp)
{
return MEMORY_BACKEND_FILE(o)->is_pmem;
}
static void file_memory_backend_set_pmem(Object *o, bool value, Error **errp)
{
HostMemoryBackend *backend = MEMORY_BACKEND(o);
HostMemoryBackendFile *fb = MEMORY_BACKEND_FILE(o);
if (host_memory_backend_mr_inited(backend)) {
error_setg(errp, "cannot change property 'pmem' of %s.",
object_get_typename(o));
return;
}
fb->is_pmem = value;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_LIBPMEM */
static bool file_memory_backend_get_readonly(Object *obj, Error **errp)
{
HostMemoryBackendFile *fb = MEMORY_BACKEND_FILE(obj);
return fb->readonly;
}
static void file_memory_backend_set_readonly(Object *obj, bool value,
Error **errp)
{
HostMemoryBackend *backend = MEMORY_BACKEND(obj);
HostMemoryBackendFile *fb = MEMORY_BACKEND_FILE(obj);
if (host_memory_backend_mr_inited(backend)) {
error_setg(errp, "cannot change property 'readonly' of %s.",
object_get_typename(obj));
return;
}
fb->readonly = value;
}
backends/hostmem-file: Add "rom" property to support VM templating with R/O files For now, "share=off,readonly=on" would always result in us opening the file R/O and mmap'ing the opened file MAP_PRIVATE R/O -- effectively turning it into ROM. Especially for VM templating, "share=off" is a common use case. However, that use case is impossible with files that lack write permissions, because "share=off,readonly=on" will not give us writable RAM. The sole user of ROM via memory-backend-file are R/O NVDIMMs, but as we have users (Kata Containers) that rely on the existing behavior -- malicious VMs should not be able to consume COW memory for R/O NVDIMMs -- we cannot change the semantics of "share=off,readonly=on" So let's add a new "rom" property with on/off/auto values. "auto" is the default and what most people will use: for historical reasons, to not change the old semantics, it defaults to the value of the "readonly" property. For VM templating, one can now use: -object memory-backend-file,share=off,readonly=on,rom=off,... But we'll disallow: -object memory-backend-file,share=on,readonly=on,rom=off,... because we would otherwise get an error when trying to mmap the R/O file shared and writable. An explicit error message is cleaner. We will also disallow for now: -object memory-backend-file,share=off,readonly=off,rom=on,... -object memory-backend-file,share=on,readonly=off,rom=on,... It's not harmful, but also not really required for now. Alternatives that were abandoned: * Make "unarmed=on" for the NVDIMM set the memory region container readonly. We would still see a change of ROM->RAM and possibly run into memslot limits with vhost-user. Further, there might be use cases for "unarmed=on" that should still allow writing to that memory (temporary files, system RAM, ...). * Add a new "readonly=on/off/auto" parameter for NVDIMMs. Similar issues as with "unarmed=on". * Make "readonly" consume "on/off/file" instead of being a 'bool' type. This would slightly changes the behavior of the "readonly" parameter: values like true/false (as accepted by a 'bool'type) would no longer be accepted. Message-ID: <20230906120503.359863-4-david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
2023-09-06 12:04:55 +00:00
static void file_memory_backend_get_rom(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
const char *name, void *opaque,
Error **errp)
{
HostMemoryBackendFile *fb = MEMORY_BACKEND_FILE(obj);
OnOffAuto rom = fb->rom;
visit_type_OnOffAuto(v, name, &rom, errp);
}
static void file_memory_backend_set_rom(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
const char *name, void *opaque,
Error **errp)
{
HostMemoryBackend *backend = MEMORY_BACKEND(obj);
HostMemoryBackendFile *fb = MEMORY_BACKEND_FILE(obj);
if (host_memory_backend_mr_inited(backend)) {
error_setg(errp, "cannot change property '%s' of %s.", name,
object_get_typename(obj));
return;
}
visit_type_OnOffAuto(v, name, &fb->rom, errp);
}
static void file_backend_unparent(Object *obj)
{
HostMemoryBackend *backend = MEMORY_BACKEND(obj);
HostMemoryBackendFile *fb = MEMORY_BACKEND_FILE(obj);
if (host_memory_backend_mr_inited(backend) && fb->discard_data) {
void *ptr = memory_region_get_ram_ptr(&backend->mr);
uint64_t sz = memory_region_size(&backend->mr);
qemu_madvise(ptr, sz, QEMU_MADV_REMOVE);
}
}
static void
file_backend_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
{
HostMemoryBackendClass *bc = MEMORY_BACKEND_CLASS(oc);
bc->alloc = file_backend_memory_alloc;
oc->unparent = file_backend_unparent;
object_class_property_add_bool(oc, "discard-data",
qom: Drop parameter @errp of object_property_add() & friends The only way object_property_add() can fail is when a property with the same name already exists. Since our property names are all hardcoded, failure is a programming error, and the appropriate way to handle it is passing &error_abort. Same for its variants, except for object_property_add_child(), which additionally fails when the child already has a parent. Parentage is also under program control, so this is a programming error, too. We have a bit over 500 callers. Almost half of them pass &error_abort, slightly fewer ignore errors, one test case handles errors, and the remaining few callers pass them to their own callers. The previous few commits demonstrated once again that ignoring programming errors is a bad idea. Of the few ones that pass on errors, several violate the Error API. The Error ** argument must be NULL, &error_abort, &error_fatal, or a pointer to a variable containing NULL. Passing an argument of the latter kind twice without clearing it in between is wrong: if the first call sets an error, it no longer points to NULL for the second call. ich9_pm_add_properties(), sparc32_ledma_realize(), sparc32_dma_realize(), xilinx_axidma_realize(), xilinx_enet_realize() are wrong that way. When the one appropriate choice of argument is &error_abort, letting users pick the argument is a bad idea. Drop parameter @errp and assert the preconditions instead. There's one exception to "duplicate property name is a programming error": the way object_property_add() implements the magic (and undocumented) "automatic arrayification". Don't drop @errp there. Instead, rename object_property_add() to object_property_try_add(), and add the obvious wrapper object_property_add(). Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20200505152926.18877-15-armbru@redhat.com> [Two semantic rebase conflicts resolved]
2020-05-05 15:29:22 +00:00
file_memory_backend_get_discard_data, file_memory_backend_set_discard_data);
object_class_property_add_str(oc, "mem-path",
qom: Drop parameter @errp of object_property_add() & friends The only way object_property_add() can fail is when a property with the same name already exists. Since our property names are all hardcoded, failure is a programming error, and the appropriate way to handle it is passing &error_abort. Same for its variants, except for object_property_add_child(), which additionally fails when the child already has a parent. Parentage is also under program control, so this is a programming error, too. We have a bit over 500 callers. Almost half of them pass &error_abort, slightly fewer ignore errors, one test case handles errors, and the remaining few callers pass them to their own callers. The previous few commits demonstrated once again that ignoring programming errors is a bad idea. Of the few ones that pass on errors, several violate the Error API. The Error ** argument must be NULL, &error_abort, &error_fatal, or a pointer to a variable containing NULL. Passing an argument of the latter kind twice without clearing it in between is wrong: if the first call sets an error, it no longer points to NULL for the second call. ich9_pm_add_properties(), sparc32_ledma_realize(), sparc32_dma_realize(), xilinx_axidma_realize(), xilinx_enet_realize() are wrong that way. When the one appropriate choice of argument is &error_abort, letting users pick the argument is a bad idea. Drop parameter @errp and assert the preconditions instead. There's one exception to "duplicate property name is a programming error": the way object_property_add() implements the magic (and undocumented) "automatic arrayification". Don't drop @errp there. Instead, rename object_property_add() to object_property_try_add(), and add the obvious wrapper object_property_add(). Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20200505152926.18877-15-armbru@redhat.com> [Two semantic rebase conflicts resolved]
2020-05-05 15:29:22 +00:00
get_mem_path, set_mem_path);
object_class_property_add(oc, "align", "int",
file_memory_backend_get_align,
file_memory_backend_set_align,
qom: Drop parameter @errp of object_property_add() & friends The only way object_property_add() can fail is when a property with the same name already exists. Since our property names are all hardcoded, failure is a programming error, and the appropriate way to handle it is passing &error_abort. Same for its variants, except for object_property_add_child(), which additionally fails when the child already has a parent. Parentage is also under program control, so this is a programming error, too. We have a bit over 500 callers. Almost half of them pass &error_abort, slightly fewer ignore errors, one test case handles errors, and the remaining few callers pass them to their own callers. The previous few commits demonstrated once again that ignoring programming errors is a bad idea. Of the few ones that pass on errors, several violate the Error API. The Error ** argument must be NULL, &error_abort, &error_fatal, or a pointer to a variable containing NULL. Passing an argument of the latter kind twice without clearing it in between is wrong: if the first call sets an error, it no longer points to NULL for the second call. ich9_pm_add_properties(), sparc32_ledma_realize(), sparc32_dma_realize(), xilinx_axidma_realize(), xilinx_enet_realize() are wrong that way. When the one appropriate choice of argument is &error_abort, letting users pick the argument is a bad idea. Drop parameter @errp and assert the preconditions instead. There's one exception to "duplicate property name is a programming error": the way object_property_add() implements the magic (and undocumented) "automatic arrayification". Don't drop @errp there. Instead, rename object_property_add() to object_property_try_add(), and add the obvious wrapper object_property_add(). Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20200505152926.18877-15-armbru@redhat.com> [Two semantic rebase conflicts resolved]
2020-05-05 15:29:22 +00:00
NULL, NULL);
object_class_property_add(oc, "offset", "int",
file_memory_backend_get_offset,
file_memory_backend_set_offset,
NULL, NULL);
object_class_property_set_description(oc, "offset",
"Offset into the target file (ex: 1G)");
#ifdef CONFIG_LIBPMEM
object_class_property_add_bool(oc, "pmem",
qom: Drop parameter @errp of object_property_add() & friends The only way object_property_add() can fail is when a property with the same name already exists. Since our property names are all hardcoded, failure is a programming error, and the appropriate way to handle it is passing &error_abort. Same for its variants, except for object_property_add_child(), which additionally fails when the child already has a parent. Parentage is also under program control, so this is a programming error, too. We have a bit over 500 callers. Almost half of them pass &error_abort, slightly fewer ignore errors, one test case handles errors, and the remaining few callers pass them to their own callers. The previous few commits demonstrated once again that ignoring programming errors is a bad idea. Of the few ones that pass on errors, several violate the Error API. The Error ** argument must be NULL, &error_abort, &error_fatal, or a pointer to a variable containing NULL. Passing an argument of the latter kind twice without clearing it in between is wrong: if the first call sets an error, it no longer points to NULL for the second call. ich9_pm_add_properties(), sparc32_ledma_realize(), sparc32_dma_realize(), xilinx_axidma_realize(), xilinx_enet_realize() are wrong that way. When the one appropriate choice of argument is &error_abort, letting users pick the argument is a bad idea. Drop parameter @errp and assert the preconditions instead. There's one exception to "duplicate property name is a programming error": the way object_property_add() implements the magic (and undocumented) "automatic arrayification". Don't drop @errp there. Instead, rename object_property_add() to object_property_try_add(), and add the obvious wrapper object_property_add(). Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20200505152926.18877-15-armbru@redhat.com> [Two semantic rebase conflicts resolved]
2020-05-05 15:29:22 +00:00
file_memory_backend_get_pmem, file_memory_backend_set_pmem);
#endif
object_class_property_add_bool(oc, "readonly",
file_memory_backend_get_readonly,
file_memory_backend_set_readonly);
backends/hostmem-file: Add "rom" property to support VM templating with R/O files For now, "share=off,readonly=on" would always result in us opening the file R/O and mmap'ing the opened file MAP_PRIVATE R/O -- effectively turning it into ROM. Especially for VM templating, "share=off" is a common use case. However, that use case is impossible with files that lack write permissions, because "share=off,readonly=on" will not give us writable RAM. The sole user of ROM via memory-backend-file are R/O NVDIMMs, but as we have users (Kata Containers) that rely on the existing behavior -- malicious VMs should not be able to consume COW memory for R/O NVDIMMs -- we cannot change the semantics of "share=off,readonly=on" So let's add a new "rom" property with on/off/auto values. "auto" is the default and what most people will use: for historical reasons, to not change the old semantics, it defaults to the value of the "readonly" property. For VM templating, one can now use: -object memory-backend-file,share=off,readonly=on,rom=off,... But we'll disallow: -object memory-backend-file,share=on,readonly=on,rom=off,... because we would otherwise get an error when trying to mmap the R/O file shared and writable. An explicit error message is cleaner. We will also disallow for now: -object memory-backend-file,share=off,readonly=off,rom=on,... -object memory-backend-file,share=on,readonly=off,rom=on,... It's not harmful, but also not really required for now. Alternatives that were abandoned: * Make "unarmed=on" for the NVDIMM set the memory region container readonly. We would still see a change of ROM->RAM and possibly run into memslot limits with vhost-user. Further, there might be use cases for "unarmed=on" that should still allow writing to that memory (temporary files, system RAM, ...). * Add a new "readonly=on/off/auto" parameter for NVDIMMs. Similar issues as with "unarmed=on". * Make "readonly" consume "on/off/file" instead of being a 'bool' type. This would slightly changes the behavior of the "readonly" parameter: values like true/false (as accepted by a 'bool'type) would no longer be accepted. Message-ID: <20230906120503.359863-4-david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
2023-09-06 12:04:55 +00:00
object_class_property_add(oc, "rom", "OnOffAuto",
file_memory_backend_get_rom, file_memory_backend_set_rom, NULL, NULL);
object_class_property_set_description(oc, "rom",
"Whether to create Read Only Memory (ROM)");
}
static void file_backend_instance_finalize(Object *o)
{
HostMemoryBackendFile *fb = MEMORY_BACKEND_FILE(o);
g_free(fb->mem_path);
}
static const TypeInfo file_backend_info = {
.name = TYPE_MEMORY_BACKEND_FILE,
.parent = TYPE_MEMORY_BACKEND,
.class_init = file_backend_class_init,
.instance_finalize = file_backend_instance_finalize,
.instance_size = sizeof(HostMemoryBackendFile),
};
static void register_types(void)
{
type_register_static(&file_backend_info);
}
type_init(register_types);