Paul E. McKenney reported [1] that commit 1f0723a4c0 ("mm, slub: enable
slub_debug static key when creating cache with explicit debug flags")
results in the lockdep complaint:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.12.0+ #15 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
rcu_torture_sta/109 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff96063cd0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: static_key_enable+0x9/0x20
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff96173c28 (slab_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kmem_cache_create_usercopy+0x2d/0x250
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (slab_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3a0
__mutex_lock+0x8d/0x920
slub_cpu_dead+0x15/0xf0
cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x17a/0x7c0
cpuhp_invoke_callback_range+0x3b/0x80
_cpu_down+0xdf/0x2a0
cpu_down+0x2c/0x50
device_offline+0x82/0xb0
remove_cpu+0x1a/0x30
torture_offline+0x80/0x140
torture_onoff+0x147/0x260
kthread+0x10a/0x140
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
-> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
check_prev_add+0x8f/0xbf0
__lock_acquire+0x13f0/0x1d80
lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3a0
cpus_read_lock+0x21/0xa0
static_key_enable+0x9/0x20
__kmem_cache_create+0x38d/0x430
kmem_cache_create_usercopy+0x146/0x250
kmem_cache_create+0xd/0x10
rcu_torture_stats+0x79/0x280
kthread+0x10a/0x140
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(slab_mutex);
lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
lock(slab_mutex);
lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by rcu_torture_sta/109:
#0: ffffffff96173c28 (slab_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kmem_cache_create_usercopy+0x2d/0x250
stack backtrace:
CPU: 3 PID: 109 Comm: rcu_torture_sta Not tainted 5.12.0+ #15
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x6d/0x89
check_noncircular+0xfe/0x110
? lock_is_held_type+0x98/0x110
check_prev_add+0x8f/0xbf0
__lock_acquire+0x13f0/0x1d80
lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3a0
? static_key_enable+0x9/0x20
? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70
cpus_read_lock+0x21/0xa0
? static_key_enable+0x9/0x20
static_key_enable+0x9/0x20
__kmem_cache_create+0x38d/0x430
kmem_cache_create_usercopy+0x146/0x250
? rcu_torture_stats_print+0xd0/0xd0
kmem_cache_create+0xd/0x10
rcu_torture_stats+0x79/0x280
? rcu_torture_stats_print+0xd0/0xd0
kthread+0x10a/0x140
? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
This is because there's one order of locking from the hotplug callbacks:
lock(cpu_hotplug_lock); // from hotplug machinery itself
lock(slab_mutex); // in e.g. slab_mem_going_offline_callback()
And commit 1f0723a4c0 made the reverse sequence possible:
lock(slab_mutex); // in kmem_cache_create_usercopy()
lock(cpu_hotplug_lock); // kmem_cache_open() -> static_key_enable()
The simplest fix is to move static_key_enable() to a place before slab_mutex is
taken. That means kmem_cache_create_usercopy() in mm/slab_common.c which is not
ideal for SLUB-specific code, but the #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG makes it
at least self-contained and obvious.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210502171827.GA3670492@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210504120019.26791-1-vbabka@suse.cz
Fixes: 1f0723a4c0 ("mm, slub: enable slub_debug static key when creating cache with explicit debug flags")
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
afe0c26d19