mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux
synced 2024-11-05 18:23:50 +00:00
efab0b5d3e
I've noticed some pretty poor behavior on OLPC machines after bootup, when gdm/X are starting. The GCD monopolizes the scheduler (which in turns means it gets to do more nand i/o), which results in processes taking much much longer than they should to start. As an example, on an OLPC machine going from OFW to a usable X (via auto-login gdm) takes 2m 30s. The majority of this time is consumed by the switch into graphical mode. With this patch, we cut a full 60s off of bootup time. After bootup, things are much snappier as well. Note that we have seen a CRC node error with this patch that causes the machine to fail to boot, but we've also seen that problem without this patch. Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@debian.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
153 lines
4.1 KiB
C
153 lines
4.1 KiB
C
/*
|
|
* JFFS2 -- Journalling Flash File System, Version 2.
|
|
*
|
|
* Copyright © 2001-2007 Red Hat, Inc.
|
|
*
|
|
* Created by David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
*
|
|
* For licensing information, see the file 'LICENCE' in this directory.
|
|
*
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/kernel.h>
|
|
#include <linux/jffs2.h>
|
|
#include <linux/mtd/mtd.h>
|
|
#include <linux/completion.h>
|
|
#include <linux/sched.h>
|
|
#include <linux/freezer.h>
|
|
#include "nodelist.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int jffs2_garbage_collect_thread(void *);
|
|
|
|
void jffs2_garbage_collect_trigger(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
|
|
{
|
|
spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
|
|
if (c->gc_task && jffs2_thread_should_wake(c))
|
|
send_sig(SIGHUP, c->gc_task, 1);
|
|
spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* This must only ever be called when no GC thread is currently running */
|
|
int jffs2_start_garbage_collect_thread(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
|
|
{
|
|
pid_t pid;
|
|
int ret = 0;
|
|
|
|
BUG_ON(c->gc_task);
|
|
|
|
init_completion(&c->gc_thread_start);
|
|
init_completion(&c->gc_thread_exit);
|
|
|
|
pid = kernel_thread(jffs2_garbage_collect_thread, c, CLONE_FS|CLONE_FILES);
|
|
if (pid < 0) {
|
|
printk(KERN_WARNING "fork failed for JFFS2 garbage collect thread: %d\n", -pid);
|
|
complete(&c->gc_thread_exit);
|
|
ret = pid;
|
|
} else {
|
|
/* Wait for it... */
|
|
D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "JFFS2: Garbage collect thread is pid %d\n", pid));
|
|
wait_for_completion(&c->gc_thread_start);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void jffs2_stop_garbage_collect_thread(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
|
|
{
|
|
int wait = 0;
|
|
spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
|
|
if (c->gc_task) {
|
|
D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "jffs2: Killing GC task %d\n", c->gc_task->pid));
|
|
send_sig(SIGKILL, c->gc_task, 1);
|
|
wait = 1;
|
|
}
|
|
spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
|
|
if (wait)
|
|
wait_for_completion(&c->gc_thread_exit);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static int jffs2_garbage_collect_thread(void *_c)
|
|
{
|
|
struct jffs2_sb_info *c = _c;
|
|
|
|
daemonize("jffs2_gcd_mtd%d", c->mtd->index);
|
|
allow_signal(SIGKILL);
|
|
allow_signal(SIGSTOP);
|
|
allow_signal(SIGCONT);
|
|
|
|
c->gc_task = current;
|
|
complete(&c->gc_thread_start);
|
|
|
|
set_user_nice(current, 10);
|
|
|
|
set_freezable();
|
|
for (;;) {
|
|
allow_signal(SIGHUP);
|
|
again:
|
|
spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
|
|
if (!jffs2_thread_should_wake(c)) {
|
|
set_current_state (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
|
|
spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
|
|
D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "jffs2_garbage_collect_thread sleeping...\n"));
|
|
schedule();
|
|
} else
|
|
spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Problem - immediately after bootup, the GCD spends a lot
|
|
* of time in places like jffs2_kill_fragtree(); so much so
|
|
* that userspace processes (like gdm and X) are starved
|
|
* despite plenty of cond_resched()s and renicing. Yield()
|
|
* doesn't help, either (presumably because userspace and GCD
|
|
* are generally competing for a higher latency resource -
|
|
* disk).
|
|
* This forces the GCD to slow the hell down. Pulling an
|
|
* inode in with read_inode() is much preferable to having
|
|
* the GC thread get there first. */
|
|
schedule_timeout_interruptible(msecs_to_jiffies(50));
|
|
|
|
/* Put_super will send a SIGKILL and then wait on the sem.
|
|
*/
|
|
while (signal_pending(current) || freezing(current)) {
|
|
siginfo_t info;
|
|
unsigned long signr;
|
|
|
|
if (try_to_freeze())
|
|
goto again;
|
|
|
|
signr = dequeue_signal_lock(current, ¤t->blocked, &info);
|
|
|
|
switch(signr) {
|
|
case SIGSTOP:
|
|
D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "jffs2_garbage_collect_thread(): SIGSTOP received.\n"));
|
|
set_current_state(TASK_STOPPED);
|
|
schedule();
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case SIGKILL:
|
|
D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "jffs2_garbage_collect_thread(): SIGKILL received.\n"));
|
|
goto die;
|
|
|
|
case SIGHUP:
|
|
D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "jffs2_garbage_collect_thread(): SIGHUP received.\n"));
|
|
break;
|
|
default:
|
|
D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "jffs2_garbage_collect_thread(): signal %ld received\n", signr));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
/* We don't want SIGHUP to interrupt us. STOP and KILL are OK though. */
|
|
disallow_signal(SIGHUP);
|
|
|
|
D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "jffs2_garbage_collect_thread(): pass\n"));
|
|
if (jffs2_garbage_collect_pass(c) == -ENOSPC) {
|
|
printk(KERN_NOTICE "No space for garbage collection. Aborting GC thread\n");
|
|
goto die;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
die:
|
|
spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
|
|
c->gc_task = NULL;
|
|
spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
|
|
complete_and_exit(&c->gc_thread_exit, 0);
|
|
}
|