mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux
synced 2024-11-05 18:23:50 +00:00
9ab4471c9f
Restore EPC at the branch whose delay slot is emulated if the delay-slot instruction signals. This is so that code in `fpu_emulator_cop1Handler' does not see EPC having advanced and mistakenly successfully resume userland execution from the location at the branch target in that case. Restoring EPC guarantees an immediate exit from the emulation loop and if EPC hasn't advanced at all since entering the loop, also issuing the signal reported by the delay-slot instruction. Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9701/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
163 lines
4.7 KiB
C
163 lines
4.7 KiB
C
#include <asm/branch.h>
|
|
#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
|
|
#include <asm/fpu_emulator.h>
|
|
#include <asm/inst.h>
|
|
#include <asm/mipsregs.h>
|
|
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
|
|
|
|
#include "ieee754.h"
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Emulate the arbritrary instruction ir at xcp->cp0_epc. Required when
|
|
* we have to emulate the instruction in a COP1 branch delay slot. Do
|
|
* not change cp0_epc due to the instruction
|
|
*
|
|
* According to the spec:
|
|
* 1) it shouldn't be a branch :-)
|
|
* 2) it can be a COP instruction :-(
|
|
* 3) if we are tring to run a protected memory space we must take
|
|
* special care on memory access instructions :-(
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* "Trampoline" return routine to catch exception following
|
|
* execution of delay-slot instruction execution.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
struct emuframe {
|
|
mips_instruction emul;
|
|
mips_instruction badinst;
|
|
mips_instruction cookie;
|
|
unsigned long epc;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
int mips_dsemul(struct pt_regs *regs, mips_instruction ir, unsigned long cpc)
|
|
{
|
|
extern asmlinkage void handle_dsemulret(void);
|
|
struct emuframe __user *fr;
|
|
int err;
|
|
|
|
if ((get_isa16_mode(regs->cp0_epc) && ((ir >> 16) == MM_NOP16)) ||
|
|
(ir == 0)) {
|
|
/* NOP is easy */
|
|
regs->cp0_epc = cpc;
|
|
clear_delay_slot(regs);
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pr_debug("dsemul %lx %lx\n", regs->cp0_epc, cpc);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* The strategy is to push the instruction onto the user stack
|
|
* and put a trap after it which we can catch and jump to
|
|
* the required address any alternative apart from full
|
|
* instruction emulation!!.
|
|
*
|
|
* Algorithmics used a system call instruction, and
|
|
* borrowed that vector. MIPS/Linux version is a bit
|
|
* more heavyweight in the interests of portability and
|
|
* multiprocessor support. For Linux we generate a
|
|
* an unaligned access and force an address error exception.
|
|
*
|
|
* For embedded systems (stand-alone) we prefer to use a
|
|
* non-existing CP1 instruction. This prevents us from emulating
|
|
* branches, but gives us a cleaner interface to the exception
|
|
* handler (single entry point).
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/* Ensure that the two instructions are in the same cache line */
|
|
fr = (struct emuframe __user *)
|
|
((regs->regs[29] - sizeof(struct emuframe)) & ~0x7);
|
|
|
|
/* Verify that the stack pointer is not competely insane */
|
|
if (unlikely(!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, fr, sizeof(struct emuframe))))
|
|
return SIGBUS;
|
|
|
|
if (get_isa16_mode(regs->cp0_epc)) {
|
|
err = __put_user(ir >> 16, (u16 __user *)(&fr->emul));
|
|
err |= __put_user(ir & 0xffff, (u16 __user *)((long)(&fr->emul) + 2));
|
|
err |= __put_user(BREAK_MATH >> 16, (u16 __user *)(&fr->badinst));
|
|
err |= __put_user(BREAK_MATH & 0xffff, (u16 __user *)((long)(&fr->badinst) + 2));
|
|
} else {
|
|
err = __put_user(ir, &fr->emul);
|
|
err |= __put_user((mips_instruction)BREAK_MATH, &fr->badinst);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
err |= __put_user((mips_instruction)BD_COOKIE, &fr->cookie);
|
|
err |= __put_user(cpc, &fr->epc);
|
|
|
|
if (unlikely(err)) {
|
|
MIPS_FPU_EMU_INC_STATS(errors);
|
|
return SIGBUS;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
regs->cp0_epc = ((unsigned long) &fr->emul) |
|
|
get_isa16_mode(regs->cp0_epc);
|
|
|
|
flush_cache_sigtramp((unsigned long)&fr->emul);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int do_dsemulret(struct pt_regs *xcp)
|
|
{
|
|
struct emuframe __user *fr;
|
|
unsigned long epc;
|
|
u32 insn, cookie;
|
|
int err = 0;
|
|
u16 instr[2];
|
|
|
|
fr = (struct emuframe __user *)
|
|
(msk_isa16_mode(xcp->cp0_epc) - sizeof(mips_instruction));
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* If we can't even access the area, something is very wrong, but we'll
|
|
* leave that to the default handling
|
|
*/
|
|
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, fr, sizeof(struct emuframe)))
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Do some sanity checking on the stackframe:
|
|
*
|
|
* - Is the instruction pointed to by the EPC an BREAK_MATH?
|
|
* - Is the following memory word the BD_COOKIE?
|
|
*/
|
|
if (get_isa16_mode(xcp->cp0_epc)) {
|
|
err = __get_user(instr[0], (u16 __user *)(&fr->badinst));
|
|
err |= __get_user(instr[1], (u16 __user *)((long)(&fr->badinst) + 2));
|
|
insn = (instr[0] << 16) | instr[1];
|
|
} else {
|
|
err = __get_user(insn, &fr->badinst);
|
|
}
|
|
err |= __get_user(cookie, &fr->cookie);
|
|
|
|
if (unlikely(err || (insn != BREAK_MATH) || (cookie != BD_COOKIE))) {
|
|
MIPS_FPU_EMU_INC_STATS(errors);
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* At this point, we are satisfied that it's a BD emulation trap. Yes,
|
|
* a user might have deliberately put two malformed and useless
|
|
* instructions in a row in his program, in which case he's in for a
|
|
* nasty surprise - the next instruction will be treated as a
|
|
* continuation address! Alas, this seems to be the only way that we
|
|
* can handle signals, recursion, and longjmps() in the context of
|
|
* emulating the branch delay instruction.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
pr_debug("dsemulret\n");
|
|
|
|
if (__get_user(epc, &fr->epc)) { /* Saved EPC */
|
|
/* This is not a good situation to be in */
|
|
force_sig(SIGBUS, current);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Set EPC to return to post-branch instruction */
|
|
xcp->cp0_epc = epc;
|
|
MIPS_FPU_EMU_INC_STATS(ds_emul);
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|