linux/Documentation/cgroup-v1/memcg_test.txt
Andrey Ryabinin f4b7e272b5 mm: remove zone_lru_lock() function, access ->lru_lock directly
We have common pattern to access lru_lock from a page pointer:
	zone_lru_lock(page_zone(page))

Which is silly, because it unfolds to this:
	&NODE_DATA(page_to_nid(page))->node_zones[page_zonenum(page)]->zone_pgdat->lru_lock
while we can simply do
	&NODE_DATA(page_to_nid(page))->lru_lock

Remove zone_lru_lock() function, since it's only complicate things.  Use
'page_pgdat(page)->lru_lock' pattern instead.

[aryabinin@virtuozzo.com: a slightly better version of __split_huge_page()]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190301121651.7741-1-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190228083329.31892-2-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-05 21:07:21 -08:00

280 lines
8.3 KiB
Text

Memory Resource Controller(Memcg) Implementation Memo.
Last Updated: 2010/2
Base Kernel Version: based on 2.6.33-rc7-mm(candidate for 34).
Because VM is getting complex (one of reasons is memcg...), memcg's behavior
is complex. This is a document for memcg's internal behavior.
Please note that implementation details can be changed.
(*) Topics on API should be in Documentation/cgroup-v1/memory.txt)
0. How to record usage ?
2 objects are used.
page_cgroup ....an object per page.
Allocated at boot or memory hotplug. Freed at memory hot removal.
swap_cgroup ... an entry per swp_entry.
Allocated at swapon(). Freed at swapoff().
The page_cgroup has USED bit and double count against a page_cgroup never
occurs. swap_cgroup is used only when a charged page is swapped-out.
1. Charge
a page/swp_entry may be charged (usage += PAGE_SIZE) at
mem_cgroup_try_charge()
2. Uncharge
a page/swp_entry may be uncharged (usage -= PAGE_SIZE) by
mem_cgroup_uncharge()
Called when a page's refcount goes down to 0.
mem_cgroup_uncharge_swap()
Called when swp_entry's refcnt goes down to 0. A charge against swap
disappears.
3. charge-commit-cancel
Memcg pages are charged in two steps:
mem_cgroup_try_charge()
mem_cgroup_commit_charge() or mem_cgroup_cancel_charge()
At try_charge(), there are no flags to say "this page is charged".
at this point, usage += PAGE_SIZE.
At commit(), the page is associated with the memcg.
At cancel(), simply usage -= PAGE_SIZE.
Under below explanation, we assume CONFIG_MEM_RES_CTRL_SWAP=y.
4. Anonymous
Anonymous page is newly allocated at
- page fault into MAP_ANONYMOUS mapping.
- Copy-On-Write.
4.1 Swap-in.
At swap-in, the page is taken from swap-cache. There are 2 cases.
(a) If the SwapCache is newly allocated and read, it has no charges.
(b) If the SwapCache has been mapped by processes, it has been
charged already.
4.2 Swap-out.
At swap-out, typical state transition is below.
(a) add to swap cache. (marked as SwapCache)
swp_entry's refcnt += 1.
(b) fully unmapped.
swp_entry's refcnt += # of ptes.
(c) write back to swap.
(d) delete from swap cache. (remove from SwapCache)
swp_entry's refcnt -= 1.
Finally, at task exit,
(e) zap_pte() is called and swp_entry's refcnt -=1 -> 0.
5. Page Cache
Page Cache is charged at
- add_to_page_cache_locked().
The logic is very clear. (About migration, see below)
Note: __remove_from_page_cache() is called by remove_from_page_cache()
and __remove_mapping().
6. Shmem(tmpfs) Page Cache
The best way to understand shmem's page state transition is to read
mm/shmem.c.
But brief explanation of the behavior of memcg around shmem will be
helpful to understand the logic.
Shmem's page (just leaf page, not direct/indirect block) can be on
- radix-tree of shmem's inode.
- SwapCache.
- Both on radix-tree and SwapCache. This happens at swap-in
and swap-out,
It's charged when...
- A new page is added to shmem's radix-tree.
- A swp page is read. (move a charge from swap_cgroup to page_cgroup)
7. Page Migration
mem_cgroup_migrate()
8. LRU
Each memcg has its own private LRU. Now, its handling is under global
VM's control (means that it's handled under global pgdat->lru_lock).
Almost all routines around memcg's LRU is called by global LRU's
list management functions under pgdat->lru_lock.
A special function is mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(). This scans
memcg's private LRU and call __isolate_lru_page() to extract a page
from LRU.
(By __isolate_lru_page(), the page is removed from both of global and
private LRU.)
9. Typical Tests.
Tests for racy cases.
9.1 Small limit to memcg.
When you do test to do racy case, it's good test to set memcg's limit
to be very small rather than GB. Many races found in the test under
xKB or xxMB limits.
(Memory behavior under GB and Memory behavior under MB shows very
different situation.)
9.2 Shmem
Historically, memcg's shmem handling was poor and we saw some amount
of troubles here. This is because shmem is page-cache but can be
SwapCache. Test with shmem/tmpfs is always good test.
9.3 Migration
For NUMA, migration is an another special case. To do easy test, cpuset
is useful. Following is a sample script to do migration.
mount -t cgroup -o cpuset none /opt/cpuset
mkdir /opt/cpuset/01
echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/01/cpuset.cpus
echo 0 > /opt/cpuset/01/cpuset.mems
echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/01/cpuset.memory_migrate
mkdir /opt/cpuset/02
echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/02/cpuset.cpus
echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/02/cpuset.mems
echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/02/cpuset.memory_migrate
In above set, when you moves a task from 01 to 02, page migration to
node 0 to node 1 will occur. Following is a script to migrate all
under cpuset.
--
move_task()
{
for pid in $1
do
/bin/echo $pid >$2/tasks 2>/dev/null
echo -n $pid
echo -n " "
done
echo END
}
G1_TASK=`cat ${G1}/tasks`
G2_TASK=`cat ${G2}/tasks`
move_task "${G1_TASK}" ${G2} &
--
9.4 Memory hotplug.
memory hotplug test is one of good test.
to offline memory, do following.
# echo offline > /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXXX/state
(XXX is the place of memory)
This is an easy way to test page migration, too.
9.5 mkdir/rmdir
When using hierarchy, mkdir/rmdir test should be done.
Use tests like the following.
echo 1 >/opt/cgroup/01/memory/use_hierarchy
mkdir /opt/cgroup/01/child_a
mkdir /opt/cgroup/01/child_b
set limit to 01.
add limit to 01/child_b
run jobs under child_a and child_b
create/delete following groups at random while jobs are running.
/opt/cgroup/01/child_a/child_aa
/opt/cgroup/01/child_b/child_bb
/opt/cgroup/01/child_c
running new jobs in new group is also good.
9.6 Mount with other subsystems.
Mounting with other subsystems is a good test because there is a
race and lock dependency with other cgroup subsystems.
example)
# mount -t cgroup none /cgroup -o cpuset,memory,cpu,devices
and do task move, mkdir, rmdir etc...under this.
9.7 swapoff.
Besides management of swap is one of complicated parts of memcg,
call path of swap-in at swapoff is not same as usual swap-in path..
It's worth to be tested explicitly.
For example, test like following is good.
(Shell-A)
# mount -t cgroup none /cgroup -o memory
# mkdir /cgroup/test
# echo 40M > /cgroup/test/memory.limit_in_bytes
# echo 0 > /cgroup/test/tasks
Run malloc(100M) program under this. You'll see 60M of swaps.
(Shell-B)
# move all tasks in /cgroup/test to /cgroup
# /sbin/swapoff -a
# rmdir /cgroup/test
# kill malloc task.
Of course, tmpfs v.s. swapoff test should be tested, too.
9.8 OOM-Killer
Out-of-memory caused by memcg's limit will kill tasks under
the memcg. When hierarchy is used, a task under hierarchy
will be killed by the kernel.
In this case, panic_on_oom shouldn't be invoked and tasks
in other groups shouldn't be killed.
It's not difficult to cause OOM under memcg as following.
Case A) when you can swapoff
#swapoff -a
#echo 50M > /memory.limit_in_bytes
run 51M of malloc
Case B) when you use mem+swap limitation.
#echo 50M > memory.limit_in_bytes
#echo 50M > memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes
run 51M of malloc
9.9 Move charges at task migration
Charges associated with a task can be moved along with task migration.
(Shell-A)
#mkdir /cgroup/A
#echo $$ >/cgroup/A/tasks
run some programs which uses some amount of memory in /cgroup/A.
(Shell-B)
#mkdir /cgroup/B
#echo 1 >/cgroup/B/memory.move_charge_at_immigrate
#echo "pid of the program running in group A" >/cgroup/B/tasks
You can see charges have been moved by reading *.usage_in_bytes or
memory.stat of both A and B.
See 8.2 of Documentation/cgroup-v1/memory.txt to see what value should be
written to move_charge_at_immigrate.
9.10 Memory thresholds
Memory controller implements memory thresholds using cgroups notification
API. You can use tools/cgroup/cgroup_event_listener.c to test it.
(Shell-A) Create cgroup and run event listener
# mkdir /cgroup/A
# ./cgroup_event_listener /cgroup/A/memory.usage_in_bytes 5M
(Shell-B) Add task to cgroup and try to allocate and free memory
# echo $$ >/cgroup/A/tasks
# a="$(dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=10)"
# a=
You will see message from cgroup_event_listener every time you cross
the thresholds.
Use /cgroup/A/memory.memsw.usage_in_bytes to test memsw thresholds.
It's good idea to test root cgroup as well.