linux/Documentation/arm64/tagged-pointers.rst
Peter Collingbourne dceec3ff78 arm64: expose FAR_EL1 tag bits in siginfo
The kernel currently clears the tag bits (i.e. bits 56-63) in the fault
address exposed via siginfo.si_addr and sigcontext.fault_address. However,
the tag bits may be needed by tools in order to accurately diagnose
memory errors, such as HWASan [1] or future tools based on the Memory
Tagging Extension (MTE).

Expose these bits via the arch_untagged_si_addr mechanism, so that
they are only exposed to signal handlers with the SA_EXPOSE_TAGBITS
flag set.

[1] http://clang.llvm.org/docs/HardwareAssistedAddressSanitizerDesign.html

Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/Ia8876bad8c798e0a32df7c2ce1256c4771c81446
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0010296597784267472fa13b39f8238d87a72cf8.1605904350.git.pcc@google.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2020-11-23 18:17:39 +00:00

89 lines
3.2 KiB
ReStructuredText

=========================================
Tagged virtual addresses in AArch64 Linux
=========================================
Author: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Date : 12 June 2013
This document briefly describes the provision of tagged virtual
addresses in the AArch64 translation system and their potential uses
in AArch64 Linux.
The kernel configures the translation tables so that translations made
via TTBR0 (i.e. userspace mappings) have the top byte (bits 63:56) of
the virtual address ignored by the translation hardware. This frees up
this byte for application use.
Passing tagged addresses to the kernel
--------------------------------------
All interpretation of userspace memory addresses by the kernel assumes
an address tag of 0x00, unless the application enables the AArch64
Tagged Address ABI explicitly
(Documentation/arm64/tagged-address-abi.rst).
This includes, but is not limited to, addresses found in:
- pointer arguments to system calls, including pointers in structures
passed to system calls,
- the stack pointer (sp), e.g. when interpreting it to deliver a
signal,
- the frame pointer (x29) and frame records, e.g. when interpreting
them to generate a backtrace or call graph.
Using non-zero address tags in any of these locations when the
userspace application did not enable the AArch64 Tagged Address ABI may
result in an error code being returned, a (fatal) signal being raised,
or other modes of failure.
For these reasons, when the AArch64 Tagged Address ABI is disabled,
passing non-zero address tags to the kernel via system calls is
forbidden, and using a non-zero address tag for sp is strongly
discouraged.
Programs maintaining a frame pointer and frame records that use non-zero
address tags may suffer impaired or inaccurate debug and profiling
visibility.
Preserving tags
---------------
When delivering signals, non-zero tags are not preserved in
siginfo.si_addr unless the flag SA_EXPOSE_TAGBITS was set in
sigaction.sa_flags when the signal handler was installed. This means
that signal handlers in applications making use of tags cannot rely
on the tag information for user virtual addresses being maintained
in these fields unless the flag was set.
Due to architecture limitations, bits 63:60 of the fault address
are not preserved in response to synchronous tag check faults
(SEGV_MTESERR) even if SA_EXPOSE_TAGBITS was set. Applications should
treat the values of these bits as undefined in order to accommodate
future architecture revisions which may preserve the bits.
For signals raised in response to watchpoint debug exceptions, the
tag information will be preserved regardless of the SA_EXPOSE_TAGBITS
flag setting.
Non-zero tags are never preserved in sigcontext.fault_address
regardless of the SA_EXPOSE_TAGBITS flag setting.
The architecture prevents the use of a tagged PC, so the upper byte will
be set to a sign-extension of bit 55 on exception return.
This behaviour is maintained when the AArch64 Tagged Address ABI is
enabled.
Other considerations
--------------------
Special care should be taken when using tagged pointers, since it is
likely that C compilers will not hazard two virtual addresses differing
only in the upper byte.