Commit graph

2 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mickaël Salaün e3e37fe022
landlock: Rename "ptrace" files to "task"
ptrace.[ch] are currently only used for the ptrace LSM hooks but their
scope will expand with IPCs and audit support.  Rename ptrace.[ch] to
task.[ch], which better reflect their content.  Similarly, rename
landlock_add_ptrace_hooks() to landlock_add_task_hooks().  Keep header
files for now.

Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240307093923.1466071-2-mic@digikod.net
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2024-03-08 18:22:16 +01:00
Mickaël Salaün afe81f7541 landlock: Add ptrace restrictions
Using ptrace(2) and related debug features on a target process can lead
to a privilege escalation.  Indeed, ptrace(2) can be used by an attacker
to impersonate another task and to remain undetected while performing
malicious activities.  Thanks to  ptrace_may_access(), various part of
the kernel can check if a tracer is more privileged than a tracee.

A landlocked process has fewer privileges than a non-landlocked process
and must then be subject to additional restrictions when manipulating
processes. To be allowed to use ptrace(2) and related syscalls on a
target process, a landlocked process must have a subset of the target
process's rules (i.e. the tracee must be in a sub-domain of the tracer).

Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-5-mic@digikod.net
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 12:22:10 -07:00