Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Josh Poimboeuf c207aee480 objtool, x86: Add several functions and files to the objtool whitelist
In preparation for an objtool rewrite which will have broader checks,
whitelist functions and files which cause problems because they do
unusual things with the stack.

These whitelists serve as a TODO list for which functions and files
don't yet have undwarf unwinder coverage.  Eventually most of the
whitelists can be removed in favor of manual CFI hint annotations or
objtool improvements.

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/7f934a5d707a574bda33ea282e9478e627fb1829.1498659915.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-06-30 10:19:19 +02:00
Denys Vlasenko e183914af0 crypto: x86 - make constants readonly, allow linker to merge them
A lot of asm-optimized routines in arch/x86/crypto/ keep its
constants in .data. This is wrong, they should be on .rodata.

Mnay of these constants are the same in different modules.
For example, 128-bit shuffle mask 0x000102030405060708090A0B0C0D0E0F
exists in at least half a dozen places.

There is a way to let linker merge them and use just one copy.
The rules are as follows: mergeable objects of different sizes
should not share sections. You can't put them all in one .rodata
section, they will lose "mergeability".

GCC puts its mergeable constants in ".rodata.cstSIZE" sections,
or ".rodata.cstSIZE.<object_name>" if -fdata-sections is used.
This patch does the same:

	.section .rodata.cst16.SHUF_MASK, "aM", @progbits, 16

It is important that all data in such section consists of
16-byte elements, not larger ones, and there are no implicit
use of one element from another.

When this is not the case, use non-mergeable section:

	.section .rodata[.VAR_NAME], "a", @progbits

This reduces .data by ~15 kbytes:

    text    data     bss     dec      hex filename
11097415 2705840 2630712 16433967  fac32f vmlinux-prev.o
11112095 2690672 2630712 16433479  fac147 vmlinux.o

Merged objects are visible in System.map:

ffffffff81a28810 r POLY
ffffffff81a28810 r POLY
ffffffff81a28820 r TWOONE
ffffffff81a28820 r TWOONE
ffffffff81a28830 r PSHUFFLE_BYTE_FLIP_MASK <- merged regardless of
ffffffff81a28830 r SHUF_MASK   <------------- the name difference
ffffffff81a28830 r SHUF_MASK
ffffffff81a28830 r SHUF_MASK
..
ffffffff81a28d00 r K512 <- merged three identical 640-byte tables
ffffffff81a28d00 r K512
ffffffff81a28d00 r K512

Use of object names in section name suffixes is not strictly necessary,
but might help if someday link stage will use garbage collection
to eliminate unused sections (ld --gc-sections).

Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
CC: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
CC: Xiaodong Liu <xiaodong.liu@intel.com>
CC: Megha Dey <megha.dey@intel.com>
CC: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
CC: x86@kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2017-01-23 22:50:29 +08:00
Greg Tucker 7a0b86b1b9 crypto: sha-mb - Fix total_len for correct hash when larger than 512MB
Current multi-buffer hash implementations have a restriction on the total
length of a hash job to 512MB. Hashing larger buffers will result in an
incorrect hash. This extends the limit to 2^62 - 1.

Signed-off-by: Greg Tucker <greg.b.tucker@intel.com>
Acked-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2016-11-17 23:35:00 +08:00
Tim Chen eb9bc8e7af crypto: sha-mb - Cleanup code to use || instead of |
for condition comparison and cleanup multiline comment style

In sha*_ctx_mgr_submit, we currently use the | operator instead of ||
((ctx->partial_block_buffer_length) | (len < SHA1_BLOCK_SIZE))

Switching it to || and remove extraneous paranthesis to
adhere to coding style.

Also cleanup inconsistent multiline comment style.

Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2016-07-12 13:02:00 +08:00
Megha Dey 4c79f6f81a crypto: sha1-mb - rename sha-mb to sha1-mb
Until now, there was only support for the SHA1 multibuffer algorithm.
Hence, there was just one sha-mb folder. Now, with the introduction of
the SHA256 multi-buffer algorithm , it is logical to name the existing
folder as sha1-mb.

Signed-off-by: Megha Dey <megha.dey@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2016-06-27 16:57:47 +08:00