When compiling for the `rusttest` target, the `core::ptr` import is
unused since its only use happens in the `reserve()` method which is
not compiled in that target:
warning: unused import: `core::ptr`
--> rust/kernel/alloc/vec_ext.rs:7:5
|
7 | use core::ptr;
| ^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: `#[warn(unused_imports)]` on by default
Thus clean it.
Fixes: 97ab3e8eec ("rust: alloc: fix dangling pointer in VecExt<T>::reserve()")
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240519210735.587323-1-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Currently, a Vec<T>'s ptr value, after calling Vec<T>::new(), is
initialized to Unique::dangling(). Hence, in VecExt<T>::reserve(), we're
passing a dangling pointer (instead of NULL) to krealloc() whenever a new
Vec<T>'s backing storage is allocated through VecExt<T> extension
functions.
This only works as long as align_of::<T>(), used by Unique::dangling() to
derive the dangling pointer, resolves to a value between 0x0 and
ZERO_SIZE_PTR (0x10) and krealloc() hence treats it the same as a NULL
pointer however.
This isn't a case we should rely on, since there may be types whose
alignment may exceed the range still covered by krealloc(), plus other
kernel allocators are not as tolerant either.
Instead, pass a real NULL pointer to krealloc_aligned() if Vec<T>'s
capacity is zero.
Fixes: 5ab560ce12 ("rust: alloc: update `VecExt` to take allocation flags")
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240501134834.22323-1-dakr@redhat.com
[ Solved `use` conflict and applied the `if`-instead-of-`match` change
discussed in the list. - Miguel ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Rust's `unused_imports` lint covers both unused and redundant imports.
In the upcoming 1.78.0, the lint detects more cases of redundant imports
[1], e.g.:
error: the item `bindings` is imported redundantly
--> rust/kernel/print.rs:38:9
|
38 | use crate::bindings;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the item `bindings` is already defined by prelude
Most cases are `use crate::bindings`, plus a few other items like `Box`.
Thus clean them up.
Note that, in the `bindings` case, the message "defined by prelude"
above means the extern prelude, i.e. the `--extern` flags we pass.
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117772 [1]
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240401212303.537355-3-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
With the adoption of `BoxExt` and `VecExt`, we don't need the functions
provided by this feature (namely the methods prefixed with `try_` and
different allocator per collection instance).
We do need `AllocError`, but we define our own as it is a trivial empty
struct.
Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240328013603.206764-11-wedsonaf@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
We also rename the methods by removing the `try_` prefix since the names
are available due to our usage of the `no_global_oom_handling` config
when building the `alloc` crate.
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240328013603.206764-8-wedsonaf@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Make fallible versions of `new` and `new_uninit` methods available in
`Box` even though it doesn't implement them because we build `alloc`
with the `no_global_oom_handling` config.
They also have an extra `flags` parameter that allows callers to pass
flags to the allocator.
Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240328013603.206764-7-wedsonaf@gmail.com
[ Used `Box::write()` to avoid one `unsafe` block as suggested by Boqun. ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
We'll use them when allocating `Box`, `Arc`, and `UniqueArc` instances,
as well as when allocating memory for `Vec` elements. These changes will
come in subsequent patches.
Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240328013603.206764-6-wedsonaf@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Make `try_with_capacity`, `try_push`, and `try_extend_from_slice`
methods available in `Vec` even though it doesn't implement them. It is
implemented with `try_reserve` and `push_within_capacity`.
This is in preparation for switching to the upstream `alloc` crate.
Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Suggested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240328013603.206764-3-wedsonaf@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
We will add more to the `alloc` module in subsequent patches (e.g.,
allocation flags and extension traits).
Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240328013603.206764-2-wedsonaf@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
