Commit graph

12 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kirill Smelkov d40fbf8d52 [media] vivi: Optimize precalculate_line()
precalculate_line() is not very high on profile, but it calls expensive
gen_twopix(), so let's polish it too:
    call gen_twopix() only once for every color bar and then distribute
    the result.
before:
    # cmdline : /home/kirr/local/perf/bin/perf record -g -a sleep 20
    #
    # Samples: 46K of event 'cycles'
    # Event count (approx.): 15574200568
    #
    # Overhead          Command         Shared Object
    # ........  ...............  ....................
    #
        27.99%             rawv  libc-2.13.so          [.] __memcpy_ssse3
        23.29%           vivi-*  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] memcpy
        10.30%             Xorg  [unknown]             [.] 0xa75c98f8
         5.34%           vivi-*  [vivi]                [k] gen_text.constprop.6
         4.61%             rawv  [vivi]                [k] gen_twopix
         2.64%             rawv  [vivi]                [k] precalculate_line
         1.37%          swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] read_hpet
after:
    # cmdline : /home/kirr/local/perf/bin/perf record -g -a sleep 20
    #
    # Samples: 45K of event 'cycles'
    # Event count (approx.): 15561769214
    #
    # Overhead          Command         Shared Object
    # ........  ...............  ....................
    #
        30.73%             rawv  libc-2.13.so          [.] __memcpy_ssse3
        26.78%           vivi-*  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] memcpy
        10.68%             Xorg  [unknown]             [.] 0xa73015e9
         5.55%           vivi-*  [vivi]                [k] gen_text.constprop.6
         1.36%          swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] read_hpet
         0.96%             Xorg  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] read_hpet
         ...
         0.16%             rawv  [vivi]                [k] precalculate_line
         ...
         0.14%             rawv  [vivi]                [k] gen_twopix
(i.e. gen_twopix and precalculate_line overheads are almost gone)

Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>
Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-12-21 18:25:57 -02:00
Kirill Smelkov 13908f330f [media] vivi: Move computations out of vivi_fillbuf linecopy loop
The "dev->mvcount % wmax" thing was showing high in profiles (we do it
for each line which ~ 500 per frame)
           ?     000010c0 <vivi_fillbuff>:
                 ...
      0,39 ? 70:???mov    0x3ff4(%edi),%esi
      0,22 ? 76:?  mov    0x2a0(%edi),%eax
      0,30 ?    ?  mov    -0x84(%ebp),%ebx
      0,35 ?    ?  mov    %eax,%edx
      0,04 ?    ?  mov    -0x7c(%ebp),%ecx
      0,35 ?    ?  sar    $0x1f,%edx
      0,44 ?    ?  idivl  -0x7c(%ebp)
     21,68 ?    ?  imul   %esi,%ecx
      0,70 ?    ?  imul   %esi,%ebx
      0,52 ?    ?  add    -0x88(%ebp),%ebx
      1,65 ?    ?  mov    %ebx,%eax
      0,22 ?    ?  imul   %edx,%esi
      0,04 ?    ?  lea    0x3f4(%edi,%esi,1),%edx
      2,18 ?    ?? call   vivi_fillbuff+0xa6
      0,74 ?    ?  addl   $0x1,-0x80(%ebp)
     62,69 ?    ?  mov    -0x7c(%ebp),%edx
      1,18 ?    ?  mov    -0x80(%ebp),%ecx
      0,35 ?    ?  add    %edx,-0x84(%ebp)
      0,61 ?    ?  cmp    %ecx,-0x8c(%ebp)
      0,22 ?    ???jne    70
so since all variables stay the same for all iterations let's move
computations out of the loop: the abovementioned division and
"width*pixelsize" too
before:
    # cmdline : /home/kirr/local/perf/bin/perf record -g -a sleep 20
    #
    # Samples: 49K of event 'cycles'
    # Event count (approx.): 16475832370
    #
    # Overhead          Command           Shared Object
    # ........  ...............  ......................
    #
        29.07%             rawv  libc-2.13.so            [.] __memcpy_ssse3
        20.57%           vivi-*  [kernel.kallsyms]       [k] memcpy
        10.20%             Xorg  [unknown]               [.] 0xa7301494
         5.16%           vivi-*  [vivi]                  [k] gen_text.constprop.6
         4.43%             rawv  [vivi]                  [k] gen_twopix
         4.36%           vivi-*  [vivi]                  [k] vivi_fillbuff
         2.42%             rawv  [vivi]                  [k] precalculate_line
         1.33%          swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]       [k] read_hpet
after:
    # cmdline : /home/kirr/local/perf/bin/perf record -g -a sleep 20
    #
    # Samples: 46K of event 'cycles'
    # Event count (approx.): 15574200568
    #
    # Overhead          Command         Shared Object
    # ........  ...............  ....................
    #
        27.99%             rawv  libc-2.13.so          [.] __memcpy_ssse3
        23.29%           vivi-*  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] memcpy
        10.30%             Xorg  [unknown]             [.] 0xa75c98f8
         5.34%           vivi-*  [vivi]                [k] gen_text.constprop.6
         4.61%             rawv  [vivi]                [k] gen_twopix
         2.64%             rawv  [vivi]                [k] precalculate_line
         1.37%          swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] read_hpet
         0.79%             Xorg  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] read_hpet
         0.64%             Xorg  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] unix_poll
         0.45%             Xorg  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] fget_light
         0.43%             rawv  libxcb.so.1.1.0       [.] 0x0000aae9
         0.40%            runsv  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] ext2_try_to_allocate
         0.36%             Xorg  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
         0.31%           vivi-*  [vivi]                [k] vivi_fillbuff
(i.e. vivi_fillbuff own overhead is almost gone)

Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>
Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-12-21 18:25:43 -02:00
Kirill Smelkov 10ce844158 [media] vivi: vivi_dev->line[] was not aligned
Though dev->line[] is u8 array we work with it as with u16, u24 or u32
pixels, and also pass it to memcpy() and it's better to align it to at
least 4.
Before the patch, on x86 offsetof(vivi_dev, line) was 1003 and after
patch it is 1004.
There is slight performance increase, but I think is is slight, only
because we start copying not from line[0]:
    ---- 8< ---- drivers/media/platform/vivi.c
    static void vivi_fillbuff(struct vivi_dev *dev, struct vivi_buffer *buf)
    {
            ...
            for (h = 0; h < hmax; h++)
                    memcpy(vbuf + h * wmax * dev->pixelsize,
                           dev->line + (dev->mv_count % wmax) * dev->pixelsize,
                           wmax * dev->pixelsize);
before:
    # cmdline : /home/kirr/local/perf/bin/perf record -g -a sleep 20
    #
    # Samples: 49K of event 'cycles'
    # Event count (approx.): 16799780016
    #
    # Overhead          Command         Shared Object
    # ........  ...............  ....................
    #
        27.51%             rawv  libc-2.13.so          [.] __memcpy_ssse3
        23.77%           vivi-*  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] memcpy
         9.96%             Xorg  [unknown]             [.] 0xa76f5e12
         4.94%           vivi-*  [vivi]                [k] gen_text.constprop.6
         4.44%             rawv  [vivi]                [k] gen_twopix
         3.17%           vivi-*  [vivi]                [k] vivi_fillbuff
         2.45%             rawv  [vivi]                [k] precalculate_line
         1.20%          swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] read_hpet
    23.77%           vivi-*  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] memcpy
                     |
                     --- memcpy
                        |
                        |--99.28%-- vivi_fillbuff
                        |          vivi_thread
                        |          kthread
                        |          ret_from_kernel_thread
                         --0.72%-- [...]
after:
    # cmdline : /home/kirr/local/perf/bin/perf record -g -a sleep 20
    #
    # Samples: 49K of event 'cycles'
    # Event count (approx.): 16475832370
    #
    # Overhead          Command           Shared Object
    # ........  ...............  ......................
    #
        29.07%             rawv  libc-2.13.so            [.] __memcpy_ssse3
        20.57%           vivi-*  [kernel.kallsyms]       [k] memcpy
        10.20%             Xorg  [unknown]               [.] 0xa7301494
         5.16%           vivi-*  [vivi]                  [k] gen_text.constprop.6
         4.43%             rawv  [vivi]                  [k] gen_twopix
         4.36%           vivi-*  [vivi]                  [k] vivi_fillbuff
         2.42%             rawv  [vivi]                  [k] precalculate_line
         1.33%          swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]       [k] read_hpet

Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>
Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-12-21 18:25:34 -02:00
Kirill Smelkov e3a8b4d22b [media] vivi: Optimize gen_text()
I've noticed that vivi takes a lot of CPU to produce its frames.
For example for 8 devices and 8 simple programs running, where each
captures YUY2 640x480 and displays it to X via SDL, profile timing is as
follows:
    # cmdline : /home/kirr/local/perf/bin/perf record -g -a sleep 20
    # Samples: 82K of event 'cycles'
    # Event count (approx.): 31551930117
    #
    # Overhead          Command         Shared Object                                                           Symbol
    # ........  ...............  ....................
    #
        49.48%           vivi-*  [vivi]                [k] gen_twopix
        10.79%           vivi-*  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] memcpy
        10.02%             rawv  libc-2.13.so          [.] __memcpy_ssse3
         8.35%           vivi-*  [vivi]                [k] gen_text.constprop.6
         5.06%             Xorg  [unknown]             [.] 0xa73015f8
         2.32%             rawv  [vivi]                [k] gen_twopix
         1.22%             rawv  [vivi]                [k] precalculate_line
         1.20%           vivi-*  [vivi]                [k] vivi_fillbuff
    (rawv is display program, vivi-* is a combination of vivi-000 through vivi-007)
so a lot of time is spent in gen_twopix() which as the follwing
call-graph profile shows ...
    49.48%           vivi-*  [vivi]                [k] gen_twopix
                     |
                     --- gen_twopix
                        |
                        |--96.30%-- gen_text.constprop.6
                        |          vivi_fillbuff
                        |          vivi_thread
                        |          kthread
                        |          ret_from_kernel_thread
                        |
                         --3.70%-- vivi_fillbuff
                                   vivi_thread
                                   kthread
                                   ret_from_kernel_thread
... is called mostly from gen_text().
If we'll look at gen_text(), in the inner loop, we'll see
    if (chr & (1 << (7 - i)))
            gen_twopix(dev, pos + j * dev->pixelsize, WHITE, (x+y) & 1);
    else
            gen_twopix(dev, pos + j * dev->pixelsize, TEXT_BLACK, (x+y) & 1);
which calls gen_twopix() for every character pixel, and that is very
expensive, because gen_twopix() branches several times.
Now, let's note, that we operate on only two colors - WHITE and
TEXT_BLACK, and that pixel for that colors could be precomputed and
gen_twopix() moved out of the inner loop. Also note, that for black
and white colors even/odd does not make a difference for all supported
pixel formats, so we could stop doing that `odd` gen_twopix() parameter
game.
So the first thing we are doing here is
    1) moving gen_twopix() calls out of gen_text() into vivi_fillbuff(),
       to pregenerate black and white colors, just before printing
       starts.
what we have next is that gen_text's font rendering loop, even with
gen_twopix() calls moved out, was inefficient and branchy, so let's
    2) rewrite gen_text() loop so it uses less variables + unroll char
       horizontal-rendering loop + instantiate 3 code paths for pixelsizes 2,3
       and 4 so that in all inner loops we don't have to branch or make
       indirections (*).
Done all above reworks, for gen_text() we get nice, non-branchy
streamlined code (showing loop for pixelsize=2):
           ?       cmp    $0x2,%eax
           ?     ? jne    26
           ?       mov    -0x18(%ebp),%eax
           ?       mov    -0x20(%ebp),%edi
           ?       imul   -0x20(%ebp),%eax
           ?       movzwl 0x3ffc(%ebx),%esi
      0,08 ?       movzwl 0x4000(%ebx),%ecx
      0,04 ?       add    %edi,%edi
           ?       mov    0x0,%ebx
      0,51 ?       mov    %edi,-0x1c(%ebp)
           ?       mov    %ebx,-0x14(%ebp)
           ?       movl   $0x0,-0x10(%ebp)
           ?       lea    0x20(%edx,%eax,2),%eax
           ?       mov    %eax,-0x18(%ebp)
           ?       xchg   %ax,%ax
      0,04 ? a0:   mov    0x8(%ebp),%ebx
           ?       mov    -0x18(%ebp),%eax
      0,04 ?       movzbl (%ebx),%edx
      0,16 ?       test   %dl,%dl
      0,04 ?     ? je     128
      0,08 ?       lea    0x0(%esi),%esi
      1,61 ? b0:???shl    $0x4,%edx
      1,02 ?    ?  mov    -0x14(%ebp),%edi
      2,04 ?    ?  add    -0x10(%ebp),%edx
      2,24 ?    ?  lea    0x1(%ebx),%ebx
      0,27 ?    ?  movzbl (%edi,%edx,1),%edx
      9,92 ?    ?  mov    %esi,%edi
      0,39 ?    ?  test   %dl,%dl
      2,04 ?    ?  cmovns %ecx,%edi
      4,63 ?    ?  test   $0x40,%dl
      0,55 ?    ?  mov    %di,(%eax)
      3,76 ?    ?  mov    %esi,%edi
      0,71 ?    ?  cmove  %ecx,%edi
      3,41 ?    ?  test   $0x20,%dl
      0,75 ?    ?  mov    %di,0x2(%eax)
      2,43 ?    ?  mov    %esi,%edi
      0,59 ?    ?  cmove  %ecx,%edi
      4,59 ?    ?  test   $0x10,%dl
      0,67 ?    ?  mov    %di,0x4(%eax)
      2,55 ?    ?  mov    %esi,%edi
      0,78 ?    ?  cmove  %ecx,%edi
      4,31 ?    ?  test   $0x8,%dl
      0,67 ?    ?  mov    %di,0x6(%eax)
      5,76 ?    ?  mov    %esi,%edi
      1,80 ?    ?  cmove  %ecx,%edi
      4,20 ?    ?  test   $0x4,%dl
      0,86 ?    ?  mov    %di,0x8(%eax)
      2,98 ?    ?  mov    %esi,%edi
      1,37 ?    ?  cmove  %ecx,%edi
      4,67 ?    ?  test   $0x2,%dl
      0,20 ?    ?  mov    %di,0xa(%eax)
      2,78 ?    ?  mov    %esi,%edi
      0,75 ?    ?  cmove  %ecx,%edi
      3,92 ?    ?  and    $0x1,%edx
      0,75 ?    ?  mov    %esi,%edx
      2,59 ?    ?  mov    %di,0xc(%eax)
      0,59 ?    ?  cmove  %ecx,%edx
      3,10 ?    ?  mov    %dx,0xe(%eax)
      2,39 ?    ?  add    $0x10,%eax
      0,51 ?    ?  movzbl (%ebx),%edx
      2,86 ?    ?  test   %dl,%dl
      2,31 ?    ???jne    b0
      0,04 ?128:   addl   $0x1,-0x10(%ebp)
      4,00 ?       mov    -0x1c(%ebp),%eax
      0,04 ?       add    %eax,-0x18(%ebp)
      0,08 ?       cmpl   $0x10,-0x10(%ebp)
           ?     ? jne    a0
which almost goes away from the profile:
    # cmdline : /home/kirr/local/perf/bin/perf record -g -a sleep 20
    # Samples: 49K of event 'cycles'
    # Event count (approx.): 16799780016
    #
    # Overhead          Command         Shared Object                                                           Symbol
    # ........  ...............  ....................
    #
        27.51%             rawv  libc-2.13.so          [.] __memcpy_ssse3
        23.77%           vivi-*  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] memcpy
         9.96%             Xorg  [unknown]             [.] 0xa76f5e12
         4.94%           vivi-*  [vivi]                [k] gen_text.constprop.6
         4.44%             rawv  [vivi]                [k] gen_twopix
         3.17%           vivi-*  [vivi]                [k] vivi_fillbuff
         2.45%             rawv  [vivi]                [k] precalculate_line
         1.20%          swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] read_hpet
i.e. gen_twopix() overhead dropped from 49% to 4% and gen_text() loops
from ~8% to ~4%, and overal cycles count dropped from 31551930117 to
16799780016 which is ~1.9x whole workload speedup.
(*) for RGB24 rendering I've introduced x24, which could be thought as
    synthetic u24 for simplifying the code. That's done because for
    memcpy used for conditional assignment, gcc generates suboptimal code
    with more indirections.
    Fortunately, in C struct assignment is builtin and that's all we
    need from pixeltype for font rendering.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>
Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-12-21 18:25:21 -02:00
Sakari Ailus 8e6057b510 [media] v4l: Convert drivers to use monotonic timestamps
Convert drivers using wall clock time (CLOCK_REALTIME) to timestamp from the
monotonic timer (CLOCK_MONOTONIC).

Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>
Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-12-21 10:56:43 -02:00
Tomasz Stanislawski a626f0ac9d [media] v4l: vivi: support for dmabuf importing
This patch enhances VIVI driver with a support for importing a buffer
from DMABUF file descriptors.

Signed-off-by: Tomasz Stanislawski <t.stanislaws@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Tested-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-11-25 17:19:19 -02:00
Kirill Smelkov 2948b0b3eb [media] vivi: Kill TSTAMP_* macros
Usage of TSTAMP_* macros has gone in 2010 in 730947bc (V4L/DVB: vivi:
clean up and a major overhaul) but the macros remain. Say goodbye to
them.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-11-14 13:45:30 -02:00
Kirill Smelkov 2669f10739 [media] vivi: Kill BUFFER_TIMEOUT macro
Usage of BUFFER_TIMEOUT has gone in 2008 in 78718e5d (V4L/DVB (7492):
vivi: Simplify the vivi driver and avoid deadlocks), but the macro
remains. Say goodbye to it.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>
Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-10-28 18:34:06 -02:00
Ezequiel Garcia 4195ec7a8f [media] vivi: Add return code check at vb2_queue_init()
This function returns an integer and it's mandatory
to check the return code.

Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-09-27 04:47:48 -03:00
Hans Verkuil 72c2af6ec1 [media] vivi/mem2mem_testdev: update to latest bus_info specification
Prefix bus_info with "platform:".

Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Acked-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-09-26 09:32:41 -03:00
Ezequiel García e923477427 [media] vivi: Remove unneeded struct vb2_queue clearing
struct vb2_queue is allocated through kzalloc as part of a larger struct,
there's no need to clear it.

Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-09-15 11:41:44 -03:00
Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2c3fb08b3f [media] rename drivers/media/video as .../platform
The remaining drivers are mostly platform drivers. Name the
dir to reflect it.

It makes sense to latter break it into a few other dirs.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-08-15 16:43:09 -03:00
Renamed from drivers/media/video/vivi.c (Browse further)