In preparation for not having a request to pass in that carries this
state, add a separate cancelation flag that allows the caller to ask
for a fixed file for cancelation.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
We just use the io_kiocb passed in to find the io_uring_task, and we
already pass in the ctx via cd->ctx anyway.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
__io_kbuf_recycle() is only called in io_kbuf_recycle(). Kill it and
tweak the code so that the legacy pbuf and ring pbuf code become clear
Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <howeyxu@tencent.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220622055551.642370-1-hao.xu@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
trace task_work_run to help provide stats on how often task work is run
and what batch sizes are coming through.
Signed-off-by: Dylan Yudaken <dylany@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220622134028.2013417-9-dylany@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Batching task work up is an important performance optimisation, as
task_work_add is expensive.
In order to keep the semantics replace the task_list with a fake node
while processing the old list, and then do a cmpxchg at the end to see if
there is more work.
Signed-off-by: Dylan Yudaken <dylany@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220622134028.2013417-6-dylany@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
With networking use cases we see contention on the spinlock used to
protect the task_list when multiple threads try and add completions at once.
Instead we can use a lockless list, and assume that the first caller to
add to the list is responsible for kicking off task work.
Signed-off-by: Dylan Yudaken <dylany@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220622134028.2013417-4-dylany@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This optimisation has some built in assumptions that make it easy to
introduce bugs. It also does not have clear wins that make it worth keeping.
Signed-off-by: Dylan Yudaken <dylany@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220622134028.2013417-2-dylany@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Since SQPOLL now uses TWA_SIGNAL_NO_IPI, there won't be task work items
without TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL. Simplify io_run_task_work() by removing
task->task_works check. Even though looks it doesn't cause extra cache
bouncing, it's still nice to not touch it an extra time when it might be
not cached.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/75d4f34b0c671075892821a409e28da6cb1d64fe.1655802465.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
task_work bits of io_uring_task are split into two cache lines causing
extra cache bouncing, place them into a separate cache line. Also move
the most used submission path fields closer together, so there are hot.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
io_poll_remove() expects poll_find() to search only for poll requests and
passes a flag for this. Just be a little bit extra cautious considering
lots of recent poll/cancellation changes and add a WARN_ON_ONCE checking
that we don't get an apoll'ed request.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ec9a66f1e22f99dcd02288d4e42f3cc6bb357804.1655684496.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
/* post CQEs */
io_commit_cqring(ctx);
spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx);
We have many places repeating this sequence, and the three function
unlock section is not perfect from the maintainance perspective and also
makes it harder to add new locking/sync trick.
Introduce two helpers. io_cq_lock(), which is simple and only grabs
->completion_lock, and io_cq_unlock_post() encapsulating the three call
section.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fe0c682bf7f7b55d9be55b0d034be9c1949277dc.1655684496.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Some io_uring-eventfd users assume that there won't be spurious wakeups.
That assumption has to be honoured by all io_cqring_ev_posted() callers,
which is inconvenient and from time to time leads to problems but should
be maintained to not break the userspace.
Instead of making the callers track whether a CQE was posted or not, hide
it inside io_eventfd_signal(). It saves ->cached_cq_tail it saw last time
and triggers the eventfd only when ->cached_cq_tail changed since then.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0ffc66bae37a2513080b601e4370e147faaa72c5.1655684496.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
clang complains on bitwise operations with bools, add a bit more
verbosity to better show that we want to call io_poll_remove_all_table()
twice but with different arguments.
Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f11d21dcdf9233e0eeb15fa13b858a05a78eb310.1655684496.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
io_uring_try_cancel_requests() loops until there is nothing left to do
with the ring, however there might be several rings and they might have
dependencies between them, e.g. via poll requests.
Instead of cancelling rings one by one, try to cancel them all and only
then loop over if we still potenially some work to do.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8d491fe02d8ac4c77ff38061cf86b9a827e8845c.1655684496.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
It's not clear how widely used IOSQE_CQE_SKIP_SUCCESS is, and how often
->flush_cqes flag prevents from completion being flushed. Sometimes it's
high level of concurrency that enables it at least for one CQE, but
sometimes it doesn't save much because nobody waiting on the CQ.
Remove ->flush_cqes flag and the optimisation, it should benefit the
normal use case. Note, that there is no spurious eventfd problem with
that as checks for spuriousness were incorporated into
io_eventfd_signal().
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/692e81eeddccc096f449a7960365fa7b4a18f8e6.1655637157.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
[axboe: remove now dead state->flush_cqes variable]
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Commit 3a3d47fa9cfd ("io_uring: make io_uring_types.h public") moved
a bunch of io_uring types to a kernel wide header, so we could make
tracing a bit saner rather than pass in a ton of arguments.
However, there are a few types in there that are not really needed to
be system wide. Move the cancel data and mapped buffers back to the
appropriate io_uring local headers.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
We have lots of trace events accepting an io_uring request and wanting
to print some of its fields like user_data, opcode, flags and so on.
However, as trace points were unaware of io_uring structures, we had to
pass all the fields as arguments. Teach trace/events/io_uring.h about
struct io_kiocb and stop the misery of passing a horde of arguments to
trace helpers.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/40ff72f92798114e56d400f2b003beb6cde6ef53.1655384063.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
__io_fill_cqe_req() is hot and inlined, we want it to be as small as
possible. Add io_req_cqe_overflow() accepting only a request and doing
all overflow accounting, and replace with it two calls to 6 argument
io_cqring_event_overflow().
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/048b9fbcce56814d77a1a540409c98c3d383edcb.1655455613.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Add comments to explain why it is always under uring lock when
incrementing head in __io_kbuf_recycle. And rectify one comemnt about
kbuf consuming in iowq case.
Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <howeyxu@tencent.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220617050429.94293-1-hao.xu@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Currently we do two extra spin lock/unlock pairs to add a poll/apoll
request to the cancellation hash table and remove it from there.
On the submission side we often already hold ->uring_lock and tw
completion is likely to hold it as well. Add a second cancellation hash
table protected by ->uring_lock. In concerns for latency because of a
need to have the mutex locked on the completion side, use the new table
only in following cases:
1) IORING_SETUP_SINGLE_ISSUER: only one task grabs uring_lock, so there
is little to no contention and so the main tw hander will almost
always end up grabbing it before calling callbacks.
2) IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL: same as with single issuer, only one task is
a major user of ->uring_lock.
3) apoll: we normally grab the lock on the completion side anyway to
execute the request, so it's free.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1bbad9c78c454b7b92f100bbf46730a37df7194f.1655371007.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hao Xu <howeyxu@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Add a new IORING_SETUP_SINGLE_ISSUER flag and the userspace visible part
of it, i.e. put limitations of submitters. Also, don't allow it together
with IOPOLL as we're not going to put it to good use.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4bcc41ee467fdf04c8aab8baf6ce3ba21858c3d4.1655371007.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hao Xu <howeyxu@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Don't allocate to many hash/cancellation buckets, there might be too
many, clamp it to 8 bits, or 256 * 64B = 16KB. We don't usually have too
many requests, and 256 buckets should be enough, especially since we
do hash search only in the cancellation path.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b9620c8072ba61a2d50eba894b89bd93a94a9abd.1655371007.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hao Xu <howeyxu@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Instead of using implicit knowledge of what is locked or not after
io_poll_find() and co returns, pass back a pointer to the locked
bucket if any. If set the user must to unlock the spinlock.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/dae1dc5749aa34367812ecf62f82fd3f053aae44.1655371007.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hao Xu <howeyxu@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Add a new io_hash_bucket structure so that each bucket in cancel_hash
has separate spinlock. Use per entry lock for cancel_hash, this removes
some completion lock invocation and remove contension between different
cancel_hash entries.
Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <howeyxu@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/05d1e135b0c8bce9d1441e6346776589e5783e26.1655371007.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
