cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: Call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notifier for failure cases too

Currently we are simply returning from target() if we encounter some error after
broadcasting CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE notifier. Which looks to be wrong as others might
depend on POSTCHANGE notifier for their functioning.

So, better broadcast CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notifier for these failure cases too,
but with old frequency.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Viresh Kumar 2013-04-01 12:57:44 +00:00 committed by Rafael J. Wysocki
parent 746b3df98b
commit fd143b4d6f

View file

@ -77,7 +77,9 @@ static int cpu0_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
rcu_read_unlock();
pr_err("failed to find OPP for %ld\n", freq_Hz);
return PTR_ERR(opp);
freqs.new = freqs.old;
ret = PTR_ERR(opp);
goto post_notify;
}
volt = opp_get_voltage(opp);
rcu_read_unlock();
@ -95,7 +97,7 @@ static int cpu0_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (ret) {
pr_err("failed to scale voltage up: %d\n", ret);
freqs.new = freqs.old;
return ret;
goto post_notify;
}
}
@ -104,7 +106,8 @@ static int cpu0_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
pr_err("failed to set clock rate: %d\n", ret);
if (cpu_reg)
regulator_set_voltage_tol(cpu_reg, volt_old, tol);
return ret;
freqs.new = freqs.old;
goto post_notify;
}
/* scaling down? scale voltage after frequency */
@ -114,16 +117,16 @@ static int cpu0_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
pr_err("failed to scale voltage down: %d\n", ret);
clk_set_rate(cpu_clk, freqs.old * 1000);
freqs.new = freqs.old;
return ret;
}
}
post_notify:
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
freqs.cpu = cpu;
cpufreq_notify_transition(&freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
}
return 0;
return ret;
}
static int cpu0_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)