From e53d92856e9f1cfa0be284fa1dc3367130ce433a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jens Remus Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 18:45:04 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] scsi: zfcp: enhance handling of FC Endpoint Security errors Enable for explicit FCP channel FC Endpoint Security error reporting and handle any FSF security errors according to specification. Take the following recovery actions when a FSF_SECURITY_ERROR is reported for the specified FSF commands: - Open Port: Retry the command if possible - Send FCP : Physically close the remote port and reopen For Open Port the command status is set to error, which triggers a retry. For Send FCP the command status is set to error and recovery is triggered to physically reopen the remote port. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200312174505.51294-10-maier@linux.ibm.com Reviewed-by: Steffen Maier Signed-off-by: Jens Remus Signed-off-by: Steffen Maier Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen --- drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c | 13 +++++++++++-- drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c index 1d3eac12a8c6..e8d0bf0ec10f 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c +++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c @@ -1405,7 +1405,8 @@ int zfcp_fsf_exchange_config_data(struct zfcp_erp_action *erp_action) req->qtcb->bottom.config.feature_selection = FSF_FEATURE_NOTIFICATION_LOST | FSF_FEATURE_UPDATE_ALERT | - FSF_FEATURE_REQUEST_SFP_DATA; + FSF_FEATURE_REQUEST_SFP_DATA | + FSF_FEATURE_FC_SECURITY; req->erp_action = erp_action; req->handler = zfcp_fsf_exchange_config_data_handler; erp_action->fsf_req_id = req->req_id; @@ -1459,7 +1460,8 @@ int zfcp_fsf_exchange_config_data_sync(struct zfcp_qdio *qdio, req->qtcb->bottom.config.feature_selection = FSF_FEATURE_NOTIFICATION_LOST | FSF_FEATURE_UPDATE_ALERT | - FSF_FEATURE_REQUEST_SFP_DATA; + FSF_FEATURE_REQUEST_SFP_DATA | + FSF_FEATURE_FC_SECURITY; if (data) req->data = data; @@ -1668,6 +1670,9 @@ static void zfcp_fsf_open_port_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req) ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_ERP_FAILED); req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR; break; + case FSF_SECURITY_ERROR: + req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR; + break; case FSF_ADAPTER_STATUS_AVAILABLE: switch (header->fsf_status_qual.word[0]) { case FSF_SQ_INVOKE_LINK_TEST_PROCEDURE: @@ -2398,6 +2403,10 @@ static void zfcp_fsf_fcp_handler_common(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req, zfcp_fc_test_link(zfcp_sdev->port); req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR; break; + case FSF_SECURITY_ERROR: + zfcp_erp_port_forced_reopen(zfcp_sdev->port, 0, "fssfch7"); + req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR; + break; } } diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.h b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.h index 66de1708973d..c6a56f96c363 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.h +++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.h @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ #define FSF_BLOCK_GUARD_CHECK_FAILURE 0x00000081 #define FSF_APP_TAG_CHECK_FAILURE 0x00000082 #define FSF_REF_TAG_CHECK_FAILURE 0x00000083 +#define FSF_SECURITY_ERROR 0x00000090 #define FSF_ADAPTER_STATUS_AVAILABLE 0x000000AD #define FSF_FCP_RSP_AVAILABLE 0x000000AF #define FSF_UNKNOWN_COMMAND 0x000000E2