super: make locking naming consistent

Make the naming consistent with the earlier introduced
super_lock_{read,write}() helpers.

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Message-Id: <20230818-vfs-super-fixes-v3-v3-2-9f0b1876e46b@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Christian Brauner 2023-08-18 16:00:49 +02:00
parent 0ed33598dd
commit d8ce82efde
3 changed files with 17 additions and 17 deletions

View file

@ -1953,9 +1953,9 @@ static long __writeback_inodes_wb(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
struct inode *inode = wb_inode(wb->b_io.prev);
struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
if (!trylock_super(sb)) {
if (!super_trylock_shared(sb)) {
/*
* trylock_super() may fail consistently due to
* super_trylock_shared() may fail consistently due to
* s_umount being grabbed by someone else. Don't use
* requeue_io() to avoid busy retrying the inode/sb.
*/

View file

@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static inline void put_file_access(struct file *file)
* super.c
*/
extern int reconfigure_super(struct fs_context *);
extern bool trylock_super(struct super_block *sb);
extern bool super_trylock_shared(struct super_block *sb);
struct super_block *user_get_super(dev_t, bool excl);
void put_super(struct super_block *sb);
extern bool mount_capable(struct fs_context *);

View file

@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
if (!(sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_FS))
return SHRINK_STOP;
if (!trylock_super(sb))
if (!super_trylock_shared(sb))
return SHRINK_STOP;
if (sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects)
@ -159,17 +159,17 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
sb = container_of(shrink, struct super_block, s_shrink);
/*
* We don't call trylock_super() here as it is a scalability bottleneck,
* so we're exposed to partial setup state. The shrinker rwsem does not
* protect filesystem operations backing list_lru_shrink_count() or
* s_op->nr_cached_objects(). Counts can change between
* super_cache_count and super_cache_scan, so we really don't need locks
* here.
* We don't call super_trylock_shared() here as it is a scalability
* bottleneck, so we're exposed to partial setup state. The shrinker
* rwsem does not protect filesystem operations backing
* list_lru_shrink_count() or s_op->nr_cached_objects(). Counts can
* change between super_cache_count and super_cache_scan, so we really
* don't need locks here.
*
* However, if we are currently mounting the superblock, the underlying
* filesystem might be in a state of partial construction and hence it
* is dangerous to access it. trylock_super() uses a SB_BORN check to
* avoid this situation, so do the same here. The memory barrier is
* is dangerous to access it. super_trylock_shared() uses a SB_BORN check
* to avoid this situation, so do the same here. The memory barrier is
* matched with the one in mount_fs() as we don't hold locks here.
*/
if (!(sb->s_flags & SB_BORN))
@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ static int grab_super(struct super_block *s) __releases(sb_lock)
}
/*
* trylock_super - try to grab ->s_umount shared
* super_trylock_shared - try to grab ->s_umount shared
* @sb: reference we are trying to grab
*
* Try to prevent fs shutdown. This is used in places where we
@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static int grab_super(struct super_block *s) __releases(sb_lock)
* of down_read(). There's a couple of places that are OK with that, but
* it's very much not a general-purpose interface.
*/
bool trylock_super(struct super_block *sb)
bool super_trylock_shared(struct super_block *sb)
{
if (down_read_trylock(&sb->s_umount)) {
if (!hlist_unhashed(&sb->s_instances) &&
@ -1210,7 +1210,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_tree_keyed);
* and the place that clears the pointer to the superblock used by this function
* before freeing the superblock.
*/
static bool lock_active_super(struct super_block *sb)
static bool super_lock_shared_active(struct super_block *sb)
{
super_lock_shared(sb);
if (!sb->s_root ||
@ -1228,7 +1228,7 @@ static void fs_bdev_mark_dead(struct block_device *bdev, bool surprise)
/* bd_holder_lock ensures that the sb isn't freed */
lockdep_assert_held(&bdev->bd_holder_lock);
if (!lock_active_super(sb))
if (!super_lock_shared_active(sb))
return;
if (!surprise)
@ -1247,7 +1247,7 @@ static void fs_bdev_sync(struct block_device *bdev)
lockdep_assert_held(&bdev->bd_holder_lock);
if (!lock_active_super(sb))
if (!super_lock_shared_active(sb))
return;
sync_filesystem(sb);
super_unlock_shared(sb);