system/linux
system/linux
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux synced 2024-11-05 18:23:50 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

writeback: account IO throttling wait as iowait

Browse source 
It makes sense to do IOWAIT when someone is blocked
due to IO throttle, as suggested by Kame and Peter.

There is an old comment for not doing IOWAIT on throttle,
however it has been mismatching the code for a long time.

If we stop accounting IOWAIT for 2.6.32, it could be an
undesirable behavior change. So restore the io_schedule.

CC: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
Wu Fengguang 2009-10-09 12:40:42 +02:00 committed by Jens Axboe
parent 8c27959858
commit d25105e891
2 changed files with 2 additions and 4 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

3
kernel/sched.c
View file

@ -6720,9 +6720,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(yield);
/* /*
* This task is about to go to sleep on IO. Increment rq->nr_iowait so * This task is about to go to sleep on IO. Increment rq->nr_iowait so
* that process accounting knows that this is a task in IO wait state. * that process accounting knows that this is a task in IO wait state.
*
* But don't do that if it is a deliberate, throttling IO wait (this task
* has set its backing_dev_info: the queue against which it should throttle)
*/ */
void __sched io_schedule(void) void __sched io_schedule(void)
{ {

3
mm/page-writeback.c
View file

@ -566,7 +566,8 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
if (pages_written >= write_chunk) if (pages_written >= write_chunk)
break; /* We've done our duty */ break; /* We've done our duty */
schedule_timeout_interruptible(pause); __set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
io_schedule_timeout(pause);
/* /*
* Increase the delay for each loop, up to our previous * Increase the delay for each loop, up to our previous