From cdf355cc60e388d992bdd205b8ee70dc4d533461 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrii Nakryiko Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:17:28 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] uprobes: add speculative lockless system-wide uprobe filter check MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit It's very common with BPF-based uprobe/uretprobe use cases to have a system-wide (not PID specific) probes used. In this case uprobe's trace_uprobe_filter->nr_systemwide counter is bumped at registration time, and actual filtering is short circuited at the time when uprobe/uretprobe is triggered. This is a great optimization, and the only issue with it is that to even get to checking this counter uprobe subsystem is taking read-side trace_uprobe_filter->rwlock. This is actually noticeable in profiles and is just another point of contention when uprobe is triggered on multiple CPUs simultaneously. This patch moves this nr_systemwide check outside of filter list's rwlock scope, as rwlock is meant to protect list modification, while nr_systemwide-based check is speculative and racy already, despite the lock (as discussed in [0]). trace_uprobe_filter_remove() and trace_uprobe_filter_add() already check for filter->nr_systewide explicitly outside of __uprobe_perf_filter, so no modifications are required there. Confirming with BPF selftests's based benchmarks. BEFORE (based on changes in previous patch) =========================================== uprobe-nop : 2.732 ± 0.022M/s uprobe-push : 2.621 ± 0.016M/s uprobe-ret : 1.105 ± 0.007M/s uretprobe-nop : 1.396 ± 0.007M/s uretprobe-push : 1.347 ± 0.008M/s uretprobe-ret : 0.800 ± 0.006M/s AFTER ===== uprobe-nop : 2.878 ± 0.017M/s (+5.5%, total +8.3%) uprobe-push : 2.753 ± 0.013M/s (+5.3%, total +10.2%) uprobe-ret : 1.142 ± 0.010M/s (+3.8%, total +3.8%) uretprobe-nop : 1.444 ± 0.008M/s (+3.5%, total +6.5%) uretprobe-push : 1.410 ± 0.010M/s (+4.8%, total +7.1%) uretprobe-ret : 0.816 ± 0.002M/s (+2.0%, total +3.9%) In the above, first percentage value is based on top of previous patch (lazy uprobe buffer optimization), while the "total" percentage is based on kernel without any of the changes in this patch set. As can be seen, we get about 4% - 10% speed up, in total, with both lazy uprobe buffer and speculative filter check optimizations. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240313131926.GA19986@redhat.com/ Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240318181728.2795838-4-andrii@kernel.org/ Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) --- kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c index cbab487e8522..8541fa1494ae 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c @@ -1226,9 +1226,6 @@ __uprobe_perf_filter(struct trace_uprobe_filter *filter, struct mm_struct *mm) { struct perf_event *event; - if (filter->nr_systemwide) - return true; - list_for_each_entry(event, &filter->perf_events, hw.tp_list) { if (event->hw.target->mm == mm) return true; @@ -1353,6 +1350,13 @@ static bool uprobe_perf_filter(struct uprobe_consumer *uc, tu = container_of(uc, struct trace_uprobe, consumer); filter = tu->tp.event->filter; + /* + * speculative short-circuiting check to avoid unnecessarily taking + * filter->rwlock below, if the uprobe has system-wide consumer + */ + if (READ_ONCE(filter->nr_systemwide)) + return true; + read_lock(&filter->rwlock); ret = __uprobe_perf_filter(filter, mm); read_unlock(&filter->rwlock);