mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux
synced 2024-09-06 18:01:05 +00:00
docs: Fix the reference labels in Locking.rst
Two jump tags were misspelled, leading to non-working cross-reference links. Reported-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1fee4f7752
commit
c8cce10a62
|
@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ perfect world).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Note that you can also use :c:func:`spin_lock_irq()` or
|
Note that you can also use :c:func:`spin_lock_irq()` or
|
||||||
:c:func:`spin_lock_irqsave()` here, which stop hardware interrupts
|
:c:func:`spin_lock_irqsave()` here, which stop hardware interrupts
|
||||||
as well: see `Hard IRQ Context <#hardirq-context>`__.
|
as well: see `Hard IRQ Context <#hard-irq-context>`__.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This works perfectly for UP as well: the spin lock vanishes, and this
|
This works perfectly for UP as well: the spin lock vanishes, and this
|
||||||
macro simply becomes :c:func:`local_bh_disable()`
|
macro simply becomes :c:func:`local_bh_disable()`
|
||||||
|
@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ The Same Softirq
|
||||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The same softirq can run on the other CPUs: you can use a per-CPU array
|
The same softirq can run on the other CPUs: you can use a per-CPU array
|
||||||
(see `Per-CPU Data <#per-cpu>`__) for better performance. If you're
|
(see `Per-CPU Data <#per-cpu-data>`__) for better performance. If you're
|
||||||
going so far as to use a softirq, you probably care about scalable
|
going so far as to use a softirq, you probably care about scalable
|
||||||
performance enough to justify the extra complexity.
|
performance enough to justify the extra complexity.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue