arm64: Use pr_* instead of printk

This patch fixed the following checkpatch complaint as using pr_*
instead of printk.

WARNING: printk() should include KERN_ facility level

Signed-off-by: Jungseok Lee <jays.lee@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Sungjinn Chung <sungjinn.chung@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jungseok Lee 2014-05-12 10:40:30 +01:00 committed by Catalin Marinas
parent da57a369d3
commit ac7b406c1a

View file

@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
frame.pc = thread_saved_pc(tsk);
}
printk("Call trace:\n");
pr_emerg("Call trace:\n");
while (1) {
unsigned long where = frame.pc;
int ret;
@ -331,17 +331,17 @@ asmlinkage void bad_mode(struct pt_regs *regs, int reason, unsigned int esr)
void __pte_error(const char *file, int line, unsigned long val)
{
printk("%s:%d: bad pte %016lx.\n", file, line, val);
pr_crit("%s:%d: bad pte %016lx.\n", file, line, val);
}
void __pmd_error(const char *file, int line, unsigned long val)
{
printk("%s:%d: bad pmd %016lx.\n", file, line, val);
pr_crit("%s:%d: bad pmd %016lx.\n", file, line, val);
}
void __pgd_error(const char *file, int line, unsigned long val)
{
printk("%s:%d: bad pgd %016lx.\n", file, line, val);
pr_crit("%s:%d: bad pgd %016lx.\n", file, line, val);
}
void __init trap_init(void)