mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux
synced 2024-11-05 18:23:50 +00:00
sfc: fix ARFS expiry check on EF10
Owing to a missing conditional, the result of rps_may_expire_flow() was
being ignored and filters were being removed even if we'd decided not to
expire them.
Fixes: f8d6203780
("sfc: ARFS filter IDs")
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ded8b9c761
commit
987c658a61
1 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -4784,8 +4784,9 @@ static bool efx_ef10_filter_rfs_expire_one(struct efx_nic *efx, u32 flow_id,
|
||||||
* will set rule->filter_id to EFX_ARFS_FILTER_ID_PENDING, meaning that
|
* will set rule->filter_id to EFX_ARFS_FILTER_ID_PENDING, meaning that
|
||||||
* the rule is not removed by efx_rps_hash_del() below.
|
* the rule is not removed by efx_rps_hash_del() below.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
ret = efx_ef10_filter_remove_internal(efx, 1U << spec->priority,
|
if (ret)
|
||||||
filter_idx, true) == 0;
|
ret = efx_ef10_filter_remove_internal(efx, 1U << spec->priority,
|
||||||
|
filter_idx, true) == 0;
|
||||||
/* While we can't safely dereference rule (we dropped the lock), we can
|
/* While we can't safely dereference rule (we dropped the lock), we can
|
||||||
* still test it for NULL.
|
* still test it for NULL.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue