sched/fair: Fix initial util_avg calculation

Change se->load.weight to se_weight(se) in the calculation for the
initial util_avg to avoid unnecessarily inflating the util_avg by 1024
times.

The reason is that se->load.weight has the unit/scale as the scaled-up
load, while cfs_rg->avg.load_avg has the unit/scale as the true task
weight (as mapped directly from the task's nice/priority value). With
CONFIG_32BIT, the scaled-up load is equal to the true task weight. With
CONFIG_64BIT, the scaled-up load is 1024 times the true task weight.
Thus, the current code may inflate the util_avg by 1024 times. The
follow-up capping will not allow the util_avg value to go wild. But the
calculation should have the correct logic.

Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <daweilics@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Vishal Chourasia <vishalc@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240315015916.21545-1-daweilics@gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
Dawei Li 2024-03-14 18:59:16 -07:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 0f1c74befa
commit 72bffbf57c

View file

@ -1031,7 +1031,8 @@ void init_entity_runnable_average(struct sched_entity *se)
* With new tasks being created, their initial util_avgs are extrapolated
* based on the cfs_rq's current util_avg:
*
* util_avg = cfs_rq->util_avg / (cfs_rq->load_avg + 1) * se.load.weight
* util_avg = cfs_rq->avg.util_avg / (cfs_rq->avg.load_avg + 1)
* * se_weight(se)
*
* However, in many cases, the above util_avg does not give a desired
* value. Moreover, the sum of the util_avgs may be divergent, such
@ -1078,7 +1079,7 @@ void post_init_entity_util_avg(struct task_struct *p)
if (cap > 0) {
if (cfs_rq->avg.util_avg != 0) {
sa->util_avg = cfs_rq->avg.util_avg * se->load.weight;
sa->util_avg = cfs_rq->avg.util_avg * se_weight(se);
sa->util_avg /= (cfs_rq->avg.load_avg + 1);
if (sa->util_avg > cap)