bcachefs: Fix needs_whiteout BUG_ON() in bkey_sort()

Btree nodes are log structured; thus, we need to emit whiteouts when
we're deleting a key that's been written out to disk.

k->needs_whiteout tracks whether a key will need a whiteout when it's
deleted, and this requires some careful handling; e.g. the key we're
deleting may not have been written out to disk, but it may have
overwritten a key that was - thus we need to carry this flag around on
overwrites.

Invariants:
There may be multiple key for the same position in a given node (because
of overwrites), but only one of them will be a live (non deleted) key,
and only one key for a given position will have the needs_whiteout flag
set.

Additionally, we don't want to carry around whiteouts that need to be
written in the main searchable part of a btree node - btree_iter_peek()
will have to skip past them, and this can lead to an O(n^2) issues when
doing sequential deletions (e.g. inode rm/truncate). So there's a
separate region in the btree node buffer for unwritten whiteouts; these
are merge sorted with the rest of the keys we're writing in the btree
node write path.

The unwritten whiteouts was a later optimization that bch2_sort_keys()
didn't take into account; the unwritten whiteouts area means that we
never have deleted keys with needs_whiteout set in the main searchable
part of a btree node.

That means we can simplify and optimize some sort paths, and eliminate
an assertion that syzbot found:

- Unless we're in the btree node write path, it's always ok to drop
  whiteouts when sorting
- When sorting for a btree node write, we drop the whiteout if it's not
  from the unwritten whiteouts area, or if it's overwritten by a real
  key at the same position.

This completely eliminates some tricky logic for propagating the
needs_whiteout flag: syzbot was able to hit the assertion that checked
that there shouldn't be more than one key at the same pos with
needs_whiteout set, likely due to a combination of flipping on
needs_whiteout on all written keys (they need whiteouts if overwritten),
combined with not always dropping unneeded whiteouts, and the tricky
logic in the sort path for preserving needs_whiteout that wasn't really
needed.

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This commit is contained in:
Kent Overstreet 2024-05-08 00:29:24 -04:00
parent 5ad1f33c29
commit 5dfd3746b6
3 changed files with 57 additions and 46 deletions

View file

@ -6,9 +6,9 @@
#include "bset.h"
#include "extents.h"
typedef int (*sort_cmp_fn)(struct btree *,
struct bkey_packed *,
struct bkey_packed *);
typedef int (*sort_cmp_fn)(const struct btree *,
const struct bkey_packed *,
const struct bkey_packed *);
static inline bool sort_iter_end(struct sort_iter *iter)
{
@ -70,9 +70,9 @@ static inline struct bkey_packed *sort_iter_next(struct sort_iter *iter,
/*
* If keys compare equal, compare by pointer order:
*/
static inline int key_sort_fix_overlapping_cmp(struct btree *b,
struct bkey_packed *l,
struct bkey_packed *r)
static inline int key_sort_fix_overlapping_cmp(const struct btree *b,
const struct bkey_packed *l,
const struct bkey_packed *r)
{
return bch2_bkey_cmp_packed(b, l, r) ?:
cmp_int((unsigned long) l, (unsigned long) r);
@ -154,46 +154,59 @@ bch2_sort_repack(struct bset *dst, struct btree *src,
return nr;
}
static inline int sort_keys_cmp(struct btree *b,
struct bkey_packed *l,
struct bkey_packed *r)
static inline int keep_unwritten_whiteouts_cmp(const struct btree *b,
const struct bkey_packed *l,
const struct bkey_packed *r)
{
return bch2_bkey_cmp_packed_inlined(b, l, r) ?:
(int) bkey_deleted(r) - (int) bkey_deleted(l) ?:
(int) l->needs_whiteout - (int) r->needs_whiteout;
(long) l - (long) r;
}
unsigned bch2_sort_keys(struct bkey_packed *dst,
struct sort_iter *iter,
bool filter_whiteouts)
#include "btree_update_interior.h"
/*
* For sorting in the btree node write path: whiteouts not in the unwritten
* whiteouts area are dropped, whiteouts in the unwritten whiteouts area are
* dropped if overwritten by real keys:
*/
unsigned bch2_sort_keys_keep_unwritten_whiteouts(struct bkey_packed *dst, struct sort_iter *iter)
{
const struct bkey_format *f = &iter->b->format;
struct bkey_packed *in, *next, *out = dst;
sort_iter_sort(iter, sort_keys_cmp);
sort_iter_sort(iter, keep_unwritten_whiteouts_cmp);
while ((in = sort_iter_next(iter, sort_keys_cmp))) {
bool needs_whiteout = false;
if (bkey_deleted(in) &&
(filter_whiteouts || !in->needs_whiteout))
while ((in = sort_iter_next(iter, keep_unwritten_whiteouts_cmp))) {
if (bkey_deleted(in) && in < unwritten_whiteouts_start(iter->b))
continue;
while ((next = sort_iter_peek(iter)) &&
!bch2_bkey_cmp_packed_inlined(iter->b, in, next)) {
BUG_ON(in->needs_whiteout &&
next->needs_whiteout);
needs_whiteout |= in->needs_whiteout;
in = sort_iter_next(iter, sort_keys_cmp);
}
if ((next = sort_iter_peek(iter)) &&
!bch2_bkey_cmp_packed_inlined(iter->b, in, next))
continue;
if (bkey_deleted(in)) {
memcpy_u64s_small(out, in, bkeyp_key_u64s(f, in));
set_bkeyp_val_u64s(f, out, 0);
} else {
bkey_p_copy(out, in);
}
out->needs_whiteout |= needs_whiteout;
bkey_p_copy(out, in);
out = bkey_p_next(out);
}
return (u64 *) out - (u64 *) dst;
}
/*
* Main sort routine for compacting a btree node in memory: we always drop
* whiteouts because any whiteouts that need to be written are in the unwritten
* whiteouts area:
*/
unsigned bch2_sort_keys(struct bkey_packed *dst, struct sort_iter *iter)
{
struct bkey_packed *in, *out = dst;
sort_iter_sort(iter, bch2_bkey_cmp_packed_inlined);
while ((in = sort_iter_next(iter, bch2_bkey_cmp_packed_inlined))) {
if (bkey_deleted(in))
continue;
bkey_p_copy(out, in);
out = bkey_p_next(out);
}

View file

@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ bch2_sort_repack(struct bset *, struct btree *,
struct btree_node_iter *,
struct bkey_format *, bool);
unsigned bch2_sort_keys(struct bkey_packed *,
struct sort_iter *, bool);
unsigned bch2_sort_keys_keep_unwritten_whiteouts(struct bkey_packed *, struct sort_iter *);
unsigned bch2_sort_keys(struct bkey_packed *, struct sort_iter *);
#endif /* _BCACHEFS_BKEY_SORT_H */

View file

@ -288,8 +288,7 @@ bool bch2_compact_whiteouts(struct bch_fs *c, struct btree *b,
static void btree_node_sort(struct bch_fs *c, struct btree *b,
unsigned start_idx,
unsigned end_idx,
bool filter_whiteouts)
unsigned end_idx)
{
struct btree_node *out;
struct sort_iter_stack sort_iter;
@ -320,7 +319,7 @@ static void btree_node_sort(struct bch_fs *c, struct btree *b,
start_time = local_clock();
u64s = bch2_sort_keys(out->keys.start, &sort_iter.iter, filter_whiteouts);
u64s = bch2_sort_keys(out->keys.start, &sort_iter.iter);
out->keys.u64s = cpu_to_le16(u64s);
@ -426,13 +425,12 @@ static bool btree_node_compact(struct bch_fs *c, struct btree *b)
break;
if (b->nsets - unwritten_idx > 1) {
btree_node_sort(c, b, unwritten_idx,
b->nsets, false);
btree_node_sort(c, b, unwritten_idx, b->nsets);
ret = true;
}
if (unwritten_idx > 1) {
btree_node_sort(c, b, 0, unwritten_idx, false);
btree_node_sort(c, b, 0, unwritten_idx);
ret = true;
}
@ -2095,11 +2093,11 @@ void __bch2_btree_node_write(struct bch_fs *c, struct btree *b, unsigned flags)
unwritten_whiteouts_end(b));
SET_BSET_SEPARATE_WHITEOUTS(i, false);
b->whiteout_u64s = 0;
u64s = bch2_sort_keys(i->start, &sort_iter.iter, false);
u64s = bch2_sort_keys_keep_unwritten_whiteouts(i->start, &sort_iter.iter);
le16_add_cpu(&i->u64s, u64s);
b->whiteout_u64s = 0;
BUG_ON(!b->written && i->u64s != b->data->keys.u64s);
set_needs_whiteout(i, false);
@ -2249,7 +2247,7 @@ bool bch2_btree_post_write_cleanup(struct bch_fs *c, struct btree *b)
* single bset:
*/
if (b->nsets > 1) {
btree_node_sort(c, b, 0, b->nsets, true);
btree_node_sort(c, b, 0, b->nsets);
invalidated_iter = true;
} else {
invalidated_iter = bch2_drop_whiteouts(b, COMPACT_ALL);