mm/swap: convert deactivate_page() to folio_deactivate()

Deactivate_page() has already been converted to use folios, this change
converts it to take in a folio argument instead of calling page_folio(). 
It also renames the function folio_deactivate() to be more consistent with
other folio functions.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix left-over comments, per Yu Zhao]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221221180848.20774-5-vishal.moola@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Vishal Moola (Oracle) 2022-12-21 10:08:48 -08:00 committed by Andrew Morton
parent f70da5ee8f
commit 5a9e34747c
6 changed files with 13 additions and 15 deletions

View file

@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ extern void lru_add_drain(void);
extern void lru_add_drain_cpu(int cpu);
extern void lru_add_drain_cpu_zone(struct zone *zone);
extern void lru_add_drain_all(void);
extern void deactivate_page(struct page *page);
void folio_deactivate(struct folio *folio);
void folio_mark_lazyfree(struct folio *folio);
extern void swap_setup(void);

View file

@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static inline unsigned long damon_pa_mark_accessed_or_deactivate(
if (mark_accessed)
folio_mark_accessed(folio);
else
deactivate_page(&folio->page);
folio_deactivate(folio);
folio_put(folio);
applied += folio_nr_pages(folio);
}

View file

@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ static int madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd,
list_add(&folio->lru, &folio_list);
}
} else
deactivate_page(&folio->page);
folio_deactivate(folio);
huge_unlock:
spin_unlock(ptl);
if (pageout)
@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static int madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd,
list_add(&folio->lru, &folio_list);
}
} else
deactivate_page(&folio->page);
folio_deactivate(folio);
}
arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode();

View file

@ -2846,11 +2846,11 @@ bool folio_mark_dirty(struct folio *folio)
if (likely(mapping)) {
/*
* readahead/lru_deactivate_page could remain
* readahead/folio_deactivate could remain
* PG_readahead/PG_reclaim due to race with folio_end_writeback
* About readahead, if the folio is written, the flags would be
* reset. So no problem.
* About lru_deactivate_page, if the folio is redirtied,
* About folio_deactivate, if the folio is redirtied,
* the flag will be reset. So no problem. but if the
* folio is used by readahead it will confuse readahead
* and make it restart the size rampup process. But it's

View file

@ -733,17 +733,15 @@ void deactivate_file_folio(struct folio *folio)
}
/*
* deactivate_page - deactivate a page
* @page: page to deactivate
* folio_deactivate - deactivate a folio
* @folio: folio to deactivate
*
* deactivate_page() moves @page to the inactive list if @page was on the active
* list and was not an unevictable page. This is done to accelerate the reclaim
* of @page.
* folio_deactivate() moves @folio to the inactive list if @folio was on the
* active list and was not unevictable. This is done to accelerate the
* reclaim of @folio.
*/
void deactivate_page(struct page *page)
void folio_deactivate(struct folio *folio)
{
struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
if (folio_test_lru(folio) && !folio_test_unevictable(folio) &&
(folio_test_active(folio) || lru_gen_enabled())) {
struct folio_batch *fbatch;

View file

@ -1920,7 +1920,7 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list,
!test_bit(PGDAT_DIRTY, &pgdat->flags))) {
/*
* Immediately reclaim when written back.
* Similar in principle to deactivate_page()
* Similar in principle to folio_deactivate()
* except we already have the folio isolated
* and know it's dirty
*/