system/linux
system/linux
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux synced 2024-11-05 18:23:50 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

documentation: Sharpen up the no-readers quick quiz

Browse source 
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
Paul E. McKenney 2016-03-15 13:40:28 -07:00
parent 6146f8df48
commit 5413e24c94
1 changed files with 8 additions and 5 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

13
Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
View file

@ -1002,18 +1002,21 @@ obligation to wait for these new readers.
<tr><th>&nbsp;</th></tr>
<tr><th align="left">Quick Quiz:</th></tr>
<tr><td>
Suppose that synchronize_rcu() did wait until all readers had completed.
Would the updater be able to rely on this?
Suppose that synchronize_rcu() did wait until <i>all</i>
readers had completed instead of waiting only on
pre-existing readers.
For how long would the updater be able to rely on there
being no readers?
</td></tr>
<tr><th align="left">Answer:</th></tr>
<tr><td bgcolor="#ffffff"><font color="ffffff">
No.
For no time at all.
Even if <tt>synchronize_rcu()</tt> were to wait until
all readers had completed, a new reader might start immediately after
<tt>synchronize_rcu()</tt> completed.
Therefore, the code following
<tt>synchronize_rcu()</tt> cannot rely on there being no readers
in any case.
<tt>synchronize_rcu()</tt> can <i>never</i> rely on there being
no readers.
</font></td></tr>
<tr><td>&nbsp;</td></tr>
</table>